User talk:RogDel

Welcome

Hello, RogDel, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DickClarkMises (talk) 17:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hi there, welcome.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Chas Smith, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. MKolt now 04:13, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something else that you can do which will really help other editors is to leave an edit summary on each edit you make. Just tell folks what you're changing by leaving a short description in the Edit summary box. MKolt now 04:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{nofootnotes}

For (what ought to be) very obvious reasons, please refrain from adding gratuitous {{nofootnotes}} templates to articles with only one source. Thanks. -- Fullstop (talk) 17:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging the pages

Hello RogDel. It is great to find you tagging the pages. This is good for the Project though sometimes looks really amusing! However, a little help in developing the contents shall be useful. I think that you will not take this as negative comments. Cheers. --Bhadani (talk) 12:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bhadani, thanks for your message. However, I'm afraid, I see myself more comfortable at tagging the pages than developing the contents, at present. I hope tagging is a real essential work too? --RogDel (talk) 12:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that it's OK for the time being, I mean the tagging work. However, I suggest that while tagging the pages, you may devote a little time to the existing contents too (I presume that you may be already doing this) to help in tasks, if required, like minor clean-ups and so on. And, sure, tagging is a fine job as it brings to focus certain missing aspects. I look forward to future when you will start enjoying contributing to contents too - you will surly be doing, I am sure. Regards. --Bhadani (talk) 14:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You tagging actions

Why don't you write at least one article after tagging a few hundred in two days? That said, you could also extract the footnotes out of the wiki links and external links that a lot of articles have that you keep tagging. That would be work but real help.--Peter Eisenburger (talk) 10:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for correcting the comma in one of my articles. But, additionally to what I said before, you should really think your actions over. I can see no sense in asking for footnotes and citations in articles like Jim Love (artist). There are five given references for this small article! You could read one of the referenced books and add well sourced information to the article. For now I deleted your tag. - You have been hinted to this point before by User:Fullstop. So will you please take a break? --Peter Eisenburger (talk) 12:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Pye (prospector)

At your request, I have added footnotes to the Harry Pye (prospector) article, all of eight sentences. I hope that you don't find it too cluttered. I endorse Peter Eisenburger's and perhaps Fullstop's suggestion that you tackle footnoting one of these articles, as well as suggesting that it be done. It is work and not as much fun as writing or word-smithing articles. Big banners at the start of short articles are disheartening. It is often better to use the in-line fact template to identify specific facts that may be unusual or controversial, and not to use the header template Citations missing. --Bejnar (talk) 19:52, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Places of birth/death

You have been repeatedly moving these into the vital dates, which is exactly opposite the recommended practice. See this page.--BillFlis (talk) 15:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just reverted your edit to Omer Clyde Aderhold so that all fukk dates are wikified. Please read WP:Date for correct formatting of dates. --Roswell native (talk) 04:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kedar Joshi

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kedar Joshi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Kedar Joshi. Bsnowball 13:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

– vs. –

Your article edit here was nominally "Some cleanup at the vital dates." However, you replaced what was already an "n dash" (–) with the text "–". Changing what is already the correct format is not really necessary and probably doesn't read as well to other editors. — AjaxSmack 00:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to add: we prefer an actual n-dash (–) to the hypertext markup "–". - Nunh-huh 23:15, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Waters

I'm puzzled by the change from 'External link' to 'External links' - there is only one link in that section. Autarch (talk) 12:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm under an impression that the title should always be "External links" even if initially only one link exists. One of the good reasons may be that more links are likely to be added in future for any article. -- RogDel (talk) 22:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comma removals.

Hi there.

Please stop removing those commas. They mark an inserted part of a sentence - kind of a dependent clause - that otherwise looks as part of the next clause, which it isn't.

An example from the Marián Cisár page: born February 25, 1978 in Bratislava, Czechoslovakia. This sentence falls into two, seperated by the comma: "born February 25" and "1978 in Bratislava".

Obviously, this is not the case. Read it out loud to yourself, and you'll find that what you read is: "born February 25 (pause) 1978 (pause) in Bratislava ...". Those pauses are the commas.

The analogy is the same for the following sentence: "Born in Akron, Ohio, to parents ..." Without the second comma it would be wrong.

Thanks.

LarRan (talk) 08:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tim Cotterill

Tim Cotterill, an article that you have contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Esasus (talk) 00:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biography articles

You are doing great work cleaning up the opening lines of biography articles, but I am wondering how edits like this help the reader? For a reader unfamiliar with the acronym for "also known as", replacing those words by "aka" takes information away, and leaves the article more confusing. How does this improve the article? Ground Zero | t 10:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment and sorry for those abbreviation edits. I thought instead of “also known as”, “aka” is used even in good articles (sorry I’m unable to cite any examples for now), which gave me an impression that aka would supposedly be a term familiar enough. But from here onwards I don’t think I would do those abbreviation edits, unless I’m allowed/asked to by some administrator. Hope this makes sense? RogDel (talk) 04:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Barnstar

Sincere Thanks. --Bhadani (talk) 15:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commas in postnominals

It is perfectly correct to list post-noms either with or without commas (the general trend is away from using them, just as full-stops have now generally been dropped), so particualrly if it's the only edit you are going to make to an article, there's absolutely no point. David Underdown (talk) 07:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question about adding citation and references on George Andreasen

HI - I am posting to you because I noticed you had edited "George Andreasen." I am his daughter and recently aqcuired some source material on his work, (newspapers etc) and tried to add a citation. I am unfamiliar with wiki style however. I read as much as I could and tried to enter the reference and citation correctly. Could you check my work and tell me what I did wrong? Thanks, Sandybeach24Sandybeach24 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry, I'm not so sure. I guess, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. RogDel (talk) 18:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help please - need to save an article

I am eliciting your help to save a wikipedia article that I see you helped on - the article in question is in danger of deletion: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Matt_carson - this article I feel meets the significant coverage guidelines as well as others as the first 5 pages of a google search for "on a hill they call capital matt carson" are full of articles and source material, not to mention the book was favorably reviewed by the Washington Post's Joel Garreau. In addition - Mr. Carson is running for Virginia house of delegates, quite big news in our state, and this was recently added to his page but then removed, the articles below reference his run for office which I feel is significant coverage and notable as well.

http://www.starexponent.com/cse/news/local/local_govtpolitics/article/independent_files_to_run_against_scott_in_statehouse/37182/

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Virginia_House_of_Delegates_elections,_2009

http://www.starexponent.com/cse/news/state_regional/state_regional_govtpolitics/article/delegate_races_heating_up_across_state/37866/

he is also linked throughout wikipedia such as the missatributed section of: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution etc.

Eager to get your take and any help you can provide. Thank you for the work you do. Ron Ron20186 (talk) 13:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Endash usage

The correct usage of the endash between two dates has two variations. If one or both of the dates have spaces (i.e. 1913 – January 1, 2009) then there are spaces surrounding the endash. If both of the dates have no spaces then there are no spaces associated with the endash, like this: 1913–2009. See MOS:ENDASH for further details. Please go back and revert your incorrect changes to vital dates. Binksternet (talk) 03:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Petra Dallmann

A tag has been placed on Petra Dallmann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ل داد (Ldud) (talk) 02:10, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petra Dallmann

The article Petra Dallmann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable professional swimmer, article doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE and WP:N.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 10:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PROD of Benjamin Abrams

Proposed deletion of Benjamin Abrams

The article Benjamin Abrams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr.TrustWorthy----Got Something to Tell Me? 14:39, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Nelson Darby

(cur) (prev) 22:31, 20 August 2009 Woodlanddog (talk | contribs) (14,016 bytes) (→Later years: Incorrect source link.) (undo)
(cur) (prev) 17:30, 13 August 2009 RogDel (talk | contribs) m (14,147 bytes) (Cleanup at the vital dates) (undo)

Crowley was correct on this observation so I am not sure why Woodlanddog says the link is incorrect. Does the notariety of the author make it an incorrect source link? Samuel Prideaux Tregelles, the cousin of Benjamin Wills Newton was on the committee for the Revised Standard. Darby had a real ding dong with Newton on eschatology and Tregelles firmly supported Newton. I might be doing a diservice here, maybe Darby was judging the authenticity of other peoples faith and not Tregelles's.--Another berean (talk) 13:48, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Roy Eugene Davis

An article that you have been involved in editing, Roy Eugene Davis, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Eugene Davis. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. B.Wind (talk) 20:39, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help with dermatology-related content

Are you interested in dermatology-related content? I am looking for more help at the dermatology task force, particularly with our new Bolognia push 2009!, history of dermatology, or list of dermatologists pages? Perhaps you would you be able to help us? ---kilbad (talk) 21:10, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leavitt articles

Have noticed you doing some cleanup on those various Leavitt pieces. Sometimes I have trouble revisiting things I've done, and your assistance is noted, and much appreciated. Thank you. MarmadukePercy (talk) 01:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. - RogDel (talk) 02:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		Many thanks for your kind assist. MarmadukePercy (talk) 02:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's very kind of you! - RogDel (talk) 02:19, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings & sorry!

Greetings Rogdel - I just undid your recent edit to Mariano Álvarez de Castro (I clicked the wrong link while scrolling my watchlist) - sorry! Fixed now. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 17:57, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks for the greetings. Kindest regards. ~ RogDel (talk) 18:13, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Wiki Birthday

Hey, RogDel. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!-- Spitfire^Tally-ho! 09:48, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! ~ RogDel (talk) 04:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello RogDel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 7 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Andrew Lipsitz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:39, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Manon Balletti

Hi! I'm Adriano user of it.wiki. I'm trying to add references and notes about Manon but the problem is: I don't know english (just a little) so it is very difficult for me to work on en.wiki. I put references, bibliography but I would to add notes and so on. I'm the main author of Giacomo Casanova in it.wiki, I'm am expert about life and works of this italian writer, about his family, lovers, friends. If it possible please look at the references and give me a little help. Thank you and best regards from Rome (Italy).Adriano C. (talk) 12:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:41, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Double parentheses

I think the role of parentheses is to separate something... so there's no meaning to put (...) (...), since what is the second parenthesis separating? Let me know! Ciao and good work. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 17:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're talking about my edits that separate vital dates from names through parentheses, then don't the parentheses, separating vital dates from names, make the whole thing look nicer and more readable? RogDel (talk) 18:04, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joan pic

Hi Rog- Why the image change on Joan I of Navarre? Just curious. Eric ^talk 19:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eric- I didn't change the image, did I? I'm not sure why you're asking me! ~ RogDel (talk) 21:57, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Um, uh, you certainly did not change it. I don't know why I thought you had. Sorry about that! Eric ^talk 00:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abhay Thipse

The article Abhay Thipse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Biography of person only known for single event. Per policy, should be mentioned in article about the even (aka Best Bakery)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dondegroovily (talk) 04:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abhay Thipse for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Abhay Thipse, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhay Thipse until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dondegroovily (talk) 04:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrew Lipsitz

The article Andrew Lipsitz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minimal notability and sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:27, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Lipsitz for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Andrew Lipsitz, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Lipsitz until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 23:04, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

vital dates

Could you please point me to the rulese behind this change? Thanks. --TakenakaN (talk) 15:34, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that sort of change makes the vital dates look prominent. ~ RogDel (talk) 17:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What about the opinion of those who wrote the articles in the original way? Did you counsult anyone before starting such huge change campaign? --TakenakaN (talk) 22:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't consult anyone as I relied on Wikipedia's policy of "being bold" and on the belief that I would be told about wrong edits "promptly". ~ RogDel (talk) 22:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to you, therefore, what should I do? Go around and revert your edits? --TakenakaN (talk) 16:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I gave you a reason why I made the changes: that they make the vital dates look prominent, easily noticeable. What reason do you have to revert the edits? ~ RogDel (talk) 22:03, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The first reason is that there is no reason to give life dates more prominence than they already have. The second reason is that a change that affects all of the biographies must be discussed in advance. --TakenakaN (talk) 10:26, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please stop changing the articles? You have no consensus for this kind of modification. --TakenakaN (talk) 11:17, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should probably read this before making any further changes. Thanks. Lugnuts (talk) 18:00, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An actual n-dash (–) is preferable to the hypertext markup "–". Please read this. ~ RogDel (talk) 21:13, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Francis Gary Powers Jr. for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Francis Gary Powers Jr., which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Gary Powers Jr. until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Victor Victoria (talk) 07:46, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting review of Omar Hijazi Article

Hi, Could you please review Omar Hijazi's Article. I have updated the article and made some improvements. Please advise if you see that any other changes are required. The article currently has two tags/ messages at the top.

Thank you! Kathrynwinters

New BLP ???

I have prepared a BLP on my brother. He is a Harvard Ph.D. scholar with a 6 pg CV and a host of references at Harvard, Oxford ... lots of scholarly publications so there should be no problem with the BLP once it is properly posted. What is the best way get this posted to WIKI?

I got your name from the Anton Kraabel page, you evidently edited that page. Anton is our grandfather. your name popped up because one of Anton's sons is named Rogner and his wife is Della RogDel? My name is Paul Kraabel with the wiki name lokikraabel. My e-mail is my name paul@kraabel.com.

here is the piece that I want posted. I also have a pic of my brother What to do? What to do?

============

A. Thomas Kraabel was born in Portland, Oregon on November 4, 1934 and attended schools in Oregon, Minnesota, and California, graduating from Oakland Technical High School in Oakland, California. He excelled in the study of Latin in high school and majored in classical languages and literature during his four years of study at Luther College in Decorah, Iowa. Following completion of the B. A. degree in 1956, he continued the study of classics at the University of Iowa for two years with the support of a Danforth Graduate Fellowship, earning the master of arts degree in 1958.

In the three years from 1958 to 1961 Kraabel studied theology at Luther Theological Seminary in St. Paul, Minnesota. During that time he offered instruction in New Testament Greek for seminary students. On completion of the B. Th. degree in 1961, he was ordained as a Lutheran pastor and served as assistant pastor of Our Saviour’s Lutheran Church in Minneapolis for two years.

In 1963 Kraabel began a doctoral degree program in New Testament and Early Christian Literature at Harvard Divinity School. Harvard University awarded him the Th. D. degree in 1968. While working on that degree he received a Rockefeller Doctoral Fellowship in Religion and the Harvard Divinity School’s Pfeiffer Fellowship in Archaeology. He also served as assistant in Greek and lecturer in New Testament at Episcopal Theological Seminary, Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1966-1967.

During his study at Harvard Kraabel developed a special interest in Hellenistic Judaism. Research topics centered on the character of Judaism in the Roman Empire and its relevance for the understanding and description of early Christianity. His service as research assistant to Erwin R. Goodenough, a distinguished scholar in that subject area, both grew out of this interest and nurtured it. The interest continued in his experience as a field archaeologist, in 1966, for the Harvard-Cornell Archaeological Exploration of the site of ancient Sardis in Turkey. The ancient synagogue at that site became a major topic of his research both during and following that experience in the field.

In the fall semester of 1967 Kraabel began his teaching career as a member of the faculty of the Department of Classics at the University of Minnesota. He enjoyed the rank of full professor in that department from 1976 to 1982, including three years as chairman of the department, 1978 to 1981. He also served as chairman of religious studies from 1969 to 1976. While on the University of Minnesota faculty, Kraabel spent the academic year 1977-1978 as a visiting fellow at Mansfield College, Oxford University, England, and some months in 1981 as a visiting fellow at Wolfson College, Oxford.

As of January 1983 Luther College in Decorah, Iowa, named Kraabel vice-president and dean of the college, as well as professor of religion and classics. He continued in this position through the 1995-1996 academic year. Subsequently he taught religion and classics at the college until his retirement at the end of the 1999-2000 academic year. Luther College named him in 1988 to an endowed professorial chair, Qualley Professor of Classics, a position he occupied until his retirement.

From 1969 to 1973 Kraabel was associate director, with Eric Meyers of Duke University, of the Joint Expedition to Khirbet Shema’, Israel, an archaeological project of the American Schools of Oriental Research. Institutional partners in the project were Duke, University of Minnesota, Harvard, Princeton, Luther College, Dropsie University, and the Smithsonian Institution..

Selected Bibliography Books:

The Future of Early Christianity: Essays in Honor of Helmut Koester. Edited with B. A. Pearson, G. W. E. Nickelsburg and N. R. Petersen. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991.

Goodenough on the Beginnings of Christianity. Brown Judaic Studies 212. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1990.

Ancient Synagogue Excavations at Khirbet Shema’, Upper Galilee, Israel 1970 -72. (Annual of the American Schools of Oriental Research 42). Durham: Duke University Press, 1976. (With E.M. Meyers and J. F. Strange).

Articles:

"Judaism at Sardis," in A. R. Seager et al. The Synagogue and Its Setting. Archaeological Exploration of Sardis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press (forthcoming).

"Christianity at Sardis," in Hans Buchwald et al. The Churches of Sardis. Archaeological Exploration of Sardis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press (forthcoming).

"The God-fearers meet the Beloved Disciple," in The Future of Early Christianity: Essays in Honor of Helmut Koester. Edited by B. A. Pearson, A. T. Kraabel, N. R. Peterson and G. W. E. Nickelsburg. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991.

"The Myth of Greece and the Liberal Arts." Inaugural Lecture, Orlando W. Qualley Chair of Classical Languages. Decorah, Iowa, 1989.

"The Synagogue at Sardis: Jews and Christians." Pages 62-73 in Sardis: Twenty-Seven Years of Discovery. Papers Presented . . . at the Oriental Institute, March 21, 1987. Edited by Eleanor Guralnick. Chicago, 1987.

"Unity and Diversity Among Diaspora Synagogues." Pages 49-60 in The Synagogue in Late Antiquity. Edited by Lee I. Levine. A Centennial Publication of The Jewish Theological Seminary of America. Philadelphia: The American Schools of Oriental Research, 1987.

"Archaeology, Iconography, and Nonliterary Written Remains." Pages 175-210 in Early Judaism and its Modern Interpreters. Edited by R. A. Kraft and G. W. E. Nickelsburg. Vol. II of The Bible and its Modern Interpreters. Edited by Douglas A. Knight. A Society of Biblical Literature Centennial Publication. Scholars Press, Atlanta/Fortress Press, Philadelphia, 1986. (With E. M. Meyers). "The God-Fearers—A Literary and Theological Invention?" Biblical Archaeology Review 12 (1986) 46-53, 64 (with R. S. MacLennan). With responses by Robert F. Tannenbaum (54-57) and Louis H. Feldman (59-63, 64-69).

"Greeks, Jews, and Lutherans in the Middle Half of Acts." Pages 147-57 in Christians Among Jews and Gentiles: Essays in Honor of Krister Stendahl on His Sixty-Fifth Birthday. Edited by G. W. E. Nickelsburg with G. W. MacRae, S. J. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1986 (=Harvard Theological Review 79, 1-3).

"Synagoga caeca. Systematic Distortion in Gentile Interpretations of Evidence for Judaism in the Early Christian Period." Pages 219-246 in To See Ourselves As Others See Us: Christians. Jews. "Others" in Late Antiquity. Edited by Jacob Neusner and Ernest S. Frerichs. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1985.

"New Evidence of the Samaritan Diaspora has been Found on Delos." Biblical Archaeologist 47 (1984) 44-46.

"Impact of the Discovery of the Sardis Synagogue." Pages 178-90 in G. M. A. Hanfmann, Sardis from Prehistoric to Roman Times. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.

"The Roots of Christmas," Dialog 21 (1982) 274-80.

“The Excavated Synagogues of Late Antiquity from Asia Minor to Italy.” XVI Internationaler Byzantinisten-Kongress, Akten II/2 = Jahrbuch der Osterreichischen Byzantinistik 32.2 (1982) 227-36.

“The Roman Diaspora: Six Questionable Assumptions.” Pages 445-464 in Essays in Honour of Yigael Yadin. Edited by G. Vermes and J. Neusner (= Journal of Jewish Studies 3.1-2, 1982).

“The Disappearance of the ‘God-Fearers’.” Numen 28 (1981) 113-126.

“Social Systems of Six Diaspora Synagogues.” Pages 79-91 + fig. 19 in Ancient Synagogues: The State of Research. Edited by J. Gutman. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1981.

“The Diaspora Synagogue: Archaeological and Epigraphic Evidence since Sukenik.” Pages 477-510, one plan, one plate, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.19. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1979. Excerpted and reprinted in Hebrew, pages 193-198 in The Ancient Synagogue: Selected Studies. Edited by Zeev Safrain. Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center for Jewish History, 1986.

“Paganism and Judaism: The Sardis Evidence.” Pages 13-33 in Paganisme, Judaisme, Christianisme: Influences et affrontements dans le mond antique. Melanges offerts a Marcel Simon. Edited by A. Benoit, M. Philonenko, and C. Vogel. Paris, 1979.

"Jews in Imperial Rome: More Archaeological Evidence from an Oxford Collection" Journal of Jewish Studies (1979) 41-58.

"The Open University, The Myth of God Incarnate and World Religious Pluralism." Dialog 17 (1978) 189-195.

"The Shalom Christians: Requiescant in pace." Dialog 15 (1977) 8-10.

"Synagogues, Ancient." New Catholic Encyclopedia, Supplement 1967-74, 16: 436-439, one plate. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.

"Khirbet Shema’ et Meiron." Revue biblique 80 (1973) 585-587 + P.. 34f.

"Archaeology and Rabbinic Tradition at Khirbet Shema’: 1970 and 1971 Campaigns." Biblical Archaeologist 25 (1972) 1-31. (With E. M. Meyers and J. F. Strange).

"Khirbet Shema’ and Meiron." Israel Exploration Journal 22 (1972) 174-176 + PI. 37f. (With E. M. Meyers and J. F. Strange).

"Melito the Bishop and the Synagogue at Sardis: Text and Context." Pages 77-85 in Studies Presented to George M. A. Hanfmann. Edited by D. G. Mitten, J. G. Pedley, and J. A. Scott. Fogg Art Museum, Harvard University, Monographs in Art and Archaeology 2. Cambridge: Fogg Art Museum, 1971.

"Khirbet Shema’ (Meiron)." Revue biblique 78 (1971) 418f. + PI. 16f. With E. M. Meyers).

“Hypsistos and the Synagogue at Sardis." Pages 81-93 in Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 10 (1969).

"Paul and the Hellenization of Christianity." Pages 23-68 in Religion In Antiquity: Essays in Memory of Erwin Ramsdell Goodenough. (Supplements to Numen 14). Edited by Jacob Neusner. Leiden: Brill, 1968. (With E. R. Goodenough).

Lokikraabel (talk) 19:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

clean up:vital dates

hello sir, i was wondering what does this mean? you made a suggestion for an article with a comment saying clean up: vital dates. Can you please elaborate ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shivangikohli1 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remove birth place from vital dates

When you "Remove birth place from vital dates" as you did for instance at Collins Obuya, possibly useful information is lost. Couldn't you place the information somewhere in the article rather than just deleting it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.136.97.86 (talk) 12:58, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I just noticed the birth place in the infobox. Sorry about that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.136.97.86 (talk) 13:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm sure you wouldn't remove a birthplace from the vital dates if the info isn't available in an infobox, WP:OPENPARA does suggest that "Birth and death places should be mentioned in the body if known, and in the lead if they are relevant to the person's notability." Do you not think we should comply with all of the MOS requirements, not just the removing from the vital dates bit? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 20:14, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, yes, you’re right; I wouldn't remove a birthplace from the vital dates if the info isn't available in an infobox (or the body). Secondly, I certainly do agree with MOS that birth and death places should be mentioned in the body if known; but I don’t really understand how they can be relevant to the person’s notability for being mentioned in the lead. I don’t understand that! ~ RogDel (talk) 00:47, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On second thoughts, I think I do understand that. So, yes, I think we should comply with all of the MOS requirements, not just the removing from the vital dates bit. ~ RogDel (talk) 01:36, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for giving the Howard Breslin the twice over. !Best O Fortuna (talk) 20:18, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sabina Simmonds

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sabina Simmonds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —>εϻαdιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 13:37, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lesley Charles

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lesley Charles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —>εϻαdιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 13:38, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Christina Singer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christina Singer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —>εϻαdιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 13:38, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vladimir Zednik

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vladimir Zednik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —>εϻαdιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 13:38, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tennis players

Hey. You seem like an experienced user, and you should know that only articles about significant people can be placed on Wikipedia. Please do not create articles with a very small description and references, we need information as to why the article about that person should be included. Thank you. —>εϻαdιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 13:41, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

A smile for you

You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 66.87.7.141 (talk) 23:18, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicky James, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2000s (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your amazing effort in 2012 and earlier. Wish you a happy new year. Iselilja (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch! ~ RogDel (talk) 07:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	For your work on Wikiquote. Cheers! ~ DanielTom (talk) 22:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! ~ RogDel (talk) 00:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Thanks for cleaning up so many articles! :) DanielTom (talk) 16:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mary Hawton

The article Mary Hawton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicate article, see Mary Bevis Hawton

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wolbo (talk) 13:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hello RogDel: In this 75th year of the congressional founding of the US Coast Guard Auxiliary, I am trying to thank every editor who has had a hand in crafting the Wikipedia article about founder Malcolm Stuart Boylan. Thank you very much for your efforts through the years! May you have fair winds and following seas all your days. Taram (talk) 22:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Kedar Joshi

A tag has been placed on Kedar Joshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. ~ Ningauble (talk) 14:27, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kedar Joshi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kedar Joshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kedar Joshi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Ningauble (talk) 18:10, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Farrokh Khambata

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Farrokh Khambata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kedar Joshi

Continuing the conversation from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kedar Joshi (2nd nomination):

You asked "If my argument is logical, thoughtful and well-written, how can it fall well short of being persuasive?". As a hobby, I listen to recordings of oral arguments made before the Supreme Court of the United States. The vast majority of the time, both parties are represented by brilliant, well-spoken attorneys who have been living and breathing their case for months. The arguments on both sides are impeccably logical and well-researched. And with a handful of exceptions, one side loses (and there are a lot of 9-0 decisions).

I think we have a very different understanding of what constitutes WP:N and WP:RS. And that's fine. If you look at my record at AfD, you'll see that some of the time I'm with the consensus and some of the time I'm not. If you want to nudge the community consensus closer to where you think it ought to be, then start participating at AfD.

As to WP:ACADEMIC: there is no corollary for anonymous peer review in the astrological community. If it's not obvious to you why that matters, you shouldn't be arguing via WP:ACADEMIC.

As to "many folks don't seem to understand the concept of significant coverage and notability": I don't care about the concept. I care about what the wider community thinks is the concept. If the rest of us don't understand the concept, and we're all not understanding the concept in a similar way, your article still doesn't get out of AfD. Remember that WP:GNG does not define notability. Rather, the community has a rough, fluid understanding of notability, some concepts of which have been captured imperfectly in WP:GNG (and other guidelines).

Finally, a note on tactics. I've !voted Keep on 60-odd AfD discussions, usually as the first !keep vote. 53 of those have resulted in the article being kept, whether by an explicit keep or a no-consensus close. Here's how you make an argument to keep an article.

Dig up gold-plated sources that were missed both by the original editor and nominator, list and briefly describe them, and incorporate them into the article. (An example.)
Then walk away.

There are other arguments to make (like you're having to make at Kedar Joshi), but their success rate is much, much lower.

Lesser Cartographies (talk) 02:04, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Participation in a research study of Wikipedians

Hi RogDel,

My name is Lara Yang, and I am a PhD student in Organizational Behavior at Stanford University. As a part of a research study to better understand work dynamics on Wikipedia, our research team is currently conducting interviews with Wikipedians. Because you are an active editor on Wikipedia, we would love to learn more about your work and hear your perspective on how Wikipedia, and open-source communities in general, function to produce and organize high-quality knowledge. We have done our best to learn about the dynamics of collaboration on Wikipedia from secondary sources, which we are hoping to complement with your invaluable first-hand insights. The interview will take around 45 minutes and be semi-structured in format. Any identifying information in your responses will be kept strictly confidential, and will not be disclosed in the analysis nor the research paper. If you are interested in participating, please email me at larayang@stanford.edu or via the 'Email this user' tool on my user page and suggest a few time slots in the upcoming weeks that work best for you. We will do our best to accommodate your schedule. Should you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to let us know. We look forward to hearing from you.

Best, Lara

Wanderingpotato (talk) 23:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]