User talk:Roanisawesome

January 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fall Out Boy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Fall Out Boy was changed by Roanisawesome (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86766 on 2017-01-21T21:52:39+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page I Like To Dance has been reverted.
Your edit here to I Like To Dance was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/lyricwiki/images/7/7f/Hot_Chelle_Rae_-_I_Like_To_Dance.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20091115140340) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:16, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roanisawesome, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Roanisawesome! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lane Boy. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lane Boy was changed by Roanisawesome (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959271 on 2017-01-22T23:25:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Heathens (song), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Heathens (song) was changed by Roanisawesome (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.89474 on 2017-01-22T23:26:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Flash: Rebirth, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MereTechnicality (talk) 23:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryan Keith Follese

The article Ryan Keith Follese has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 00:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Live In California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Live In California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live In California until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions}) 01:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Frank Iero and the Patience

Hello Roanisawesome,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Frank Iero and the Patience for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 11:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rookshot

The article Rookshot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. BLPPROD would apply to each of the individuals. No evidence of musical notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have speedily deleted the page because it lacked a credible indication of importance, which is an accepted criteria for speedy deletion. Please do not recreate it in the mainspace (you risk being blocked for recreating deleted material if you do so). If you want still want to make it an article, the people at articles for creation can help you create a draft that meets Wikipedia standards so that it can be placed into the mainspace. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at 5 Seconds of Summer discography, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See WP:OVERLINK. Raritydash (talk) 02:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hot Chelle Rae discography. Raritydash (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the links you add to articles. The ones you have added are either circular (they link back to the article) or do not exist. Please check when adding links. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Frank Iero And The Patience

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Frank Iero And The Patience. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – The Cab. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Cab – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —Non-Dropframe _talk 23:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Millenium (American Band)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Millenium (American Band), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Domdeparis (talk) 19:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lovesick Electric, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Adding on tracks that do not exist on the album Domdeparis (talk) 19:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I Like To Dance

The article I Like To Dance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability not established

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kellymoat (talk) 16:59, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Regional At Best

The article Regional At Best has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable album created by blocked user

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kellymoat (talk) 10:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Regional At Best

The article Regional At Best has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Incorrect title. Should be at Regional at Best, but that is a redirect. The content fails WP:GNG. There should be no redirect left.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]