User talk:Rhul5vats

A K Fazlul Haque Bhuiyan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to A K Fazlul Haque Bhuiyan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 13:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rhul5vats (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators/MER-C,

I am writing to respectfully request the reconsideration of the indefinite block placed on my account. I acknowledge that my actions were perceived as advertising or self-promotion, but I wish to clarify that I never intended to misuse Wikipedia’s platform.

As an employee, I aimed to contribute accurate and factual information about my employer, believing it to be relevant and helpful to Wikipedia users. While the information I provided was true to its nature and verifiable, I now recognize that my edits created the appearance of a conflict of interest, which could be interpreted as promotional and is against Wikipedia’s guidelines.

Since the block, I have thoroughly reviewed Wikipedia’s policies on neutrality, conflict of interest, and reliable sourcing. I now fully understand the importance of maintaining an encyclopedic standard that prioritizes neutrality and community trust above all else.

I sincerely apologize for any disruption caused by my edits. If unblocked, I am committed to:

- Ensuring all future contributions strictly align with Wikipedia’s guidelines on neutrality and verifiability.

- Revising the pages I previously edited to fully adhere to Wikipedia’s guidelines, ensuring they meet all standards of neutrality, verifiability, and relevance.

I kindly request that you reconsider my block. I am confident that I can make meaningful contributions while respecting Wikipedia’s values. Thank you for taking the time to review my appeal.

Yours sincerely, Rhul5vats

Decline reason:

This was written by an AI(93% certain according to zeroGPT). You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you directly. Please write your request in your own words without the aid of an AI. 331dot (talk) 08:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rhul5vats (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators/MER-C, I kindly ask you to review the block on my account. I understand my actions might have looked like self-promotion, but I didn’t mean to misuse Wikipedia. I tried to share true and useful facts about my employer, but I now understand that my edits might have looked biased, which goes against Wikipedia’s rules. Following the block, I’ve taken the time to thoroughly study Wikipedia’s guidelines. I now fully appreciate the necessity of upholding neutrality and fostering community trust to maintain the platform’s high standards. I’m truly sorry for any issues my edits caused. Given the chance, I’ll make sure all future contributions follow Wikipedia’s rules and will improve past edits to meet its highest standards. I kindly request that you reconsider my block. I am confident that I can make meaningful contributions while respecting Wikipedia’s values. Thank you for taking the time to review my appeal. Yours sincerely, Rhul5vats

Decline reason:

I think the conversation below is a start, but we need to be sure that you understand certain things:

You generally should not be editing content about your employer. You may, however, use {{Edit COI}} to make requests on talk pages that others make an edit after reviewing it.

You absolutely must disclose your relationship with them, publicly.

I am also unsure if you are using AI/LLMs to communicate. Wikipedia accounts are meant to be run by individual humans. This is a collaborative envornment, if you can't communicate coherently in your own words, you can't particpate here.

A new unblock request addressing all of these points in your own words would likely be compelling. El Beeblerino ^{if you're not into the whole brevity thing} 23:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Rhul5vats. If you are unblocked, what topics would you like to edit? QwertyForest (talk) 10:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my appeal.

If unblocked, I’ll focus on creating well-researched, neutral content that highlights the achievements of athletes in lesser-known sports such as kabaddi and volleyball, bringing valuable insights to Wikipedia.

Additionally, I am interested in editing articles about music artists and other notable personalities, focusing on documenting their achievements and impact to inspire others in their respective fields.

I ensure all edits align with Wikipedia’s guidelines on neutrality, verifiability, and notability, contributing meaningfully to its mission.

Thank you for your consideration.

That's good to hear. However, I am not sure if you wrote that reply or an AI did. Reading it as a human, it looks suspicious. GPTZero said that it is likely 100% AI generated, but QuillBot and ZeroGPT says that this was written by a human. For now, I'll assume that you wrote it. @MER-C:, what do you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by QwertyForest (talk • contribs) 04:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rhul5vats (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now understand that I cannot edit content about my employer and am ready to work collaboratively with other editors. However, I would like to reiterate that all the information on the pages I created was completely neutral without any promotional tone. If you can unblock me, I will make use of "Edit COI" to request edits from other editors and make sure not to edit any topics that may have a conflict of interest. Please, consider my unblock request and give me a chance to show I can be a good contributor to wiki.

Decline reason:

I briefly looked at your contributions and saw that you wrote "staffed by professionally trained movers dedicated to serving customers". This is not we call neutral without any promotional tone. PhilKnight (talk) 09:00, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rhul5vats (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

if there are any promotional tones, that particular section can be edited or removed. Why the entire page/account is getting affected given the information is not misleading. Everyone makes errors initially, and we learn from them. And completely banning the user without giving a chance to rectify the mistake is kinda harsh, is what I infer. Please, I request you to relax the block on my account and provide me another chance. Thanks in advance

Decline reason:

You were blocked, not banned. Blocks are preventative. In this case it prevents you making the same mistakes until you demonstrate that you understand where you went wrong.

As for this appeal - a complaint about the fairness of the block is not an acceptable appeal. Cabayi (talk) 11:48, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Rhul5vats (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I have been reading day in and day out on different Wikipedia topics and I clearly understand how editing or adding info works now. I would like to contribute to this platform again. Please consider my unblock request or help me with what else is required from my end to lift the block.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello, I have been reading day in and day out on different Wikipedia topics and I clearly understand how editing or adding info works now. I would like to contribute to this platform again. Please consider my unblock request or help me with what else is required from my end to lift the block. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, I have been reading day in and day out on different Wikipedia topics and I clearly understand how editing or adding info works now. I would like to contribute to this platform again. Please consider my unblock request or help me with what else is required from my end to lift the block. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, I have been reading day in and day out on different Wikipedia topics and I clearly understand how editing or adding info works now. I would like to contribute to this platform again. Please consider my unblock request or help me with what else is required from my end to lift the block. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

(Non-administrator comment) A few things that could help your chances of your unblock request being accepted:

Giving us an example of a specific edit you would like to make (even a small one)
Listing clearly which ones of the pages you created fell under a conflict of interest

Regarding that second point: you said that I am interested in editing articles about music artists and other notable personalities, but Draft:Kush K was flagged as possibly having been created in exchange for undisclosed payments. Can you clarify whether you indeed have any connection to the subject? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:43, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]