User talk:Rgedarov

Welcome!

Hello, Rgedarov! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 15:48, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Illumio (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ceradon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Illumio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ceradon (talk • contribs) 13:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rgedarov, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ceradon (talk • contribs) 13:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Illumio has been accepted

Illumio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GE Ventures has been accepted

GE Ventures, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Vrac (talk) 19:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just accepted this article at AFC and wanted to confirm whether the GE Ventures is article is a paid assignment or not. Thanks and Regards, Vrac (talk) 19:43, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vrac - thank you for your review of and edits to the GE Ventures article, it is greatly appreciated! Per your question, I am confirming that this was a paid assignment. Rgedarov (talk) 20:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Someone pointed out that I missed a step regarding verification of paid contributions. The policy Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure documents what must be declared for paid editing (see How to disclose section of document). I have placed the connected contributor template on the Talk:GE Ventures page, ideally this is something you should have done, however we are missing the "employer" data, i.e. who paid you to do the editing, which differs from client, which in this case I presume to be GE Ventures. Please let us know who the employer is so we can fill it out. Thanks and Regards, Vrac (talk) 19:43, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vrac - apologies for the trouble! Confirming that my employer is The OutCast Agency (www.theoutcastagency.com), and you are correct that my client is General Electric / GE Ventures. I can add these specifics to my Wikipedia user page as well. If there's anything else that needs to be done to reassure compliance, please let me know.

Thanks for that. You should take a close look at the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure policy, the requirements for disclosure have recently changed. Regards, Vrac (talk) 23:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosures

Hi Rgedarov

You haven't made that many edits to WP:

Were all those paid editing jobs? Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 06:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]