User talk:Redacted II
Index
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 1 section is present. |
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Trouted
[edit]
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: The landing of B12 was not perfect, the booster was decommissioned after Test Flight 5 primarily due to the fact that the one of the four chine was opened and damaged (not nominal under any circumstance), do not false flag me for "vandalism" the Partial Success was the B12 landing, not the IFT-5 mission (the mission itself was a full mission Success), please reconsider your actions next time, respectfully SylveonFan2005.
- One, sign your posts. Two: landing was successful. Redacted II (talk) 22:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, and three: "Whacking with a wet trout or trouting is a common practice on Wikipedia when experienced editors slip up and make a silly mistake"
- This is misuse of the trout Redacted II (talk) 20:08, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
YouTube references
[edit]Simply putting a link to a nearly eight hour video makes it nearly impossible for other editors to validate your sources. When using audio/visuals as references (which is not preferred to begin with) you need to at least include a timecode and preferably a verbatim quotation of thing you are referencing. It’s a pain and why most editors prefer written sources. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- I've added a more acceptable source Redacted II (talk) 06:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)