User talk:RastaKins

Hello RastaKins, and Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some good links that you might find useful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes (~~~) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, you can leave a new message on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to help you. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold!

— FireFox 17:41, 01 February 2007

Your submission at Articles for creation: Western Digital WD16

Mike Friese, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RastaKins (talk) 21:43, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Western Digital WD16 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Western Digital WD16, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:44, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Hi RastaKins! Thank you for your edits to 31-bit computing. It looks like you've copied or moved text from LGP-30 into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 17:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input. I did not know I was supposed to do that. I have added the attribution to 31-bit computing. RastaKins (talk) 17:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Western Digital WD16 (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP is not a how-to manual. Also- needs more 3rd party independent references to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Western Digital WD16 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 15:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RastaKins! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nightenbelle (talk) 15:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PDP-11 architecture

Thanks for your new text here mentioning coroutines. I tightened the paragraph up a bit. Your Edit Summary says that the text came from a "WD16 article" but I can't figure out what that is. It might help if you added a reference. Spike-from-NH (talk) 20:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edits. Look for WD16 in Wikipedia. RastaKins (talk) 14:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I get it! I thought you meant "article" as in externally published article. Cheers! Spike-from-NH (talk) 03:00, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 13:14, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note to all: Fountains of Bryn Mawr has disingenuously posted this warning on my talk page. Mawr has been reverting my edits to the history of personal computers article; I have not been reverting Mawr. See history. I made the initial edit. There is a long discussion on the article's talk page. Notice Mawr's determined unwillingness to arrive at a consensus or provide constructive editing to improve the article. RastaKins (talk) 19:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Microsystems revert

Sounds like we have an issue with our source, then. The very title of the Dr. Dobbs article is "A PDP-11-Like 16-Bit Micro for the S-100 Bus". Why would that make its operating system more like the PDP-10 than the PDP-11? Bumm13 (talk) 21:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you're right, the Dr. Dobbs article does make several references to the operating system having various DecSystem-10 (PDP-10) conventions. Bumm13 (talk) 21:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What Wilcox is coyly talking about is that he heisted a lot of concepts from TOPS-10. Alpha Micro got sued for this by DEC. In particular from the TOPS-10 article: "TOPS-10 had a very robust application programming interface (API) that used a mechanism called a UUO or Unimplemented User Operation. UUOs implemented operating system calls in a way that made them look like machine instructions."

What does this mean for the Alpha Micro? AMOS SVCA B and C operating system calls (see WD16) used standard PDP-11 addressing modes for their arguments. So you could open a file in any of these ways:

OPEN file

OPEN file(R2)

LEA R2, file; OPEN @R2

OPEN @(SP)+

RastaKins (talk) 22:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PDP-11 architecture bis

I've undone your most recent edit. Yes, MARK is a miserable instruction. But the paragraph you edited sets out the general nature of processor registers (and the idea of orthogonality). Including the exceptional, non-orthogonal, and rarely-used MARK instruction complicates this introduction, and for little benefit. You describe MARK adequately (and better than I had) when we come to it. In fact, MARK's non-orthogonality is not unique; the non-miserable branch instructions all exclusively use R7, and the trap instructions use R6 and R7. Spike-from-NH (talk) 01:32, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good points. The revert was a good move. RastaKins (talk) 03:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]