User talk:Rabauter

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rabauter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you unblock me, I will no longer troll and will contribute to Wikipedias sucsess. Please forgive me and I am sorry. I am ready to be constructive now. --Rabauter (talk) 21:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC) Rabauter (talk) 21:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no indication that unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 22:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access.

This user is currently being considered for adminship. To view the discussion and voice your opinion, please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rabauter.

Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)

Moderate to high level of vandalism

[view • purge • update]

4.80 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 16:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tz'utujil people has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tz'utujil people was changed by Rabauter (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924765 on 2015-10-28T20:39:57+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tz'utujil people with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 20:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Warriorluz. BethNaught (talk) 20:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Post

I'd appreciate if you didn't claim to be an admin when this is not the case. Thanks, GAB^Hello! 20:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also appreciate it you didn't egg on vandals. GAB^Hello! 20:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On Adminship

See WP:TROPHY. Impersonating an admin as your first few edits means you are nowhere close to it, and if you continue to do so you will likely be blocked. ~ NottNott talk|contrib 20:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Rabauter, you act like you are an inexperienced new editor but, somehow, in your first hour of editing, you find your way to Template talk:Did you know which a new editor would not know about. Please do not troll this website. For an account that has been active an hour, you are not getting off to a great start. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. --Rabauter (talk) 21:32, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MURICA4LIFE, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Dr. K. 21:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am a sock of User:MURICA4LIFE. I admit it. --Rabauter (talk) 21:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What about Warriorluz? Dr. K. 21:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure why not. --Rabauter (talk) 21:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to bed as I am tired. Goodnight Wikifriends. Let me know how the sockpuppet inquest goes. Write me a postcard. --Rabauter (talk) 21:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]