User talk:RK

Old stuff

User talk:RK/Archive
User talk:RK/Archive 2
User talk:RK/Archive 3
user talk:RK/Departure
User talk:RK/Archive 5
User talk:RK/Archive 6
User talk:RK/Archive 7

New discussions

Hello, RK. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

....
Please help edit the rulings of Salat and Islamic_views_on_sin . Thanks. - Verycuriousboy (talk) 07:02, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source for Jimbo quote

CH, you recently wroye in the General Relativity Talk page:

While as of June 2006 there are still some Wikipedians knowledgeable about gtr, given what I view as the failure of WP as a source reliable information (see recent comments by our founder, Jimbo Wales),

Could you give me a reference for this quote? Also, have you discussed the possibility of creating a Physics wiki, one that has a measure of formal peer review, disallows all edits by anonymoys users, and requires registered users to give a valid e-mail? If Jimbo weren't so insistent on anarchy (literally) Wikipedia could have had a chance to be useful. As it turns out, however, it has sunk into a morass that can never be redeemed. RK 12:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Robert. RK 12:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking for it myself. I missed the NY Times article, unfortunately, but I've seen several [articles] which mention a St. Petersburg Times interview in which their most famous netizen allegedly said that Wikipedia cannot now or ever be used as a reference (e.g. for schoolwork), which to my mind is inconsistent with the reason I came here: to create an encyclopedia. I am still searching Google and places in WP for a working link to the text of this interview. ---CH 21:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of Haredi Judaism

Hello RK! I had mentioned in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Judaism that until recently Modern Orthodox Judaism was the only major denomination with a criticism section. I notice in particular that Haredi Judaism doesn't have a criticism section. Perhaps you might be interested in created a section explaining the difficulties people to the left of Haredi Judaism have with it(properly sourced of course). Best wishes. And perhaps the way their leaders talk about other denominations might be one of the issues of concern. --Shirahadasha 22:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hello again RK! It's great to see you're still active on Wikipedia. Just thought I'd let you know - if you have time, your expertise will be helpful on this page. [1] Regards. 172 | Talk 05:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

RK, you have been blocked for 1 week following your violation of the No personal attacks aspect of your arbitration case. Details can be found at http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#RK_2 --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merges, moves

_ _ Hi, didn't notice your return until just now; welcome back.
_ _ While i haven't looked to see whether you at least preserved the former text, your conversion into a Dab of Avodah Zarah amounts to either a cut-&-paste move or a bootleg deletion. The previous revisions belong as part of the page-history of Idolatry in Judaism, even if the text is redundant. Don't do that.
--Jerzy•t 06:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What the Bleep Do We Know!?

Hello, I'm writing you to determine if there is concensus amoung recent editors of What the Bleep Do We Know!? to remove it's NPOV tag. Please weigh in with your opinion on the talk page Talk:What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!?. Thanks!! Adelord 19:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hey

If you have five minutes, go here [2] and read talk topics 13-15. If you think it is important, then consider commenting, Slrubenstein | Talk 06:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the Good Book

Hag Sameach!

Do you think it is controversial to claim that Jews call their Tanakh "the Bible?" I don't. Do you think it is controversial to claim that "the Bible" refers only to the combined "Old Testament" and "New Testament," i.e. is a term that refers to the sacred scriptures of Christians (but not Jews)? I do, but this is precisely the claim Home Computer is making on the Bible talk page: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Bible#Current_layout

Feel free to weigh in. And please watch out for Home Computer's attempts to change the article. Slrubenstein | Talk 10:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please disregard, this wikipedian is stirring trouble, see his talk page. --Home Computer 15:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Judaism and Christianity

You may care to comment here: [3] Slrubenstein | Talk 13:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Book of Ezekiel, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.

Your Trolling

Stop trolling or I will need to block you. RobertKaiser 03:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re.:Greenpeace

You asked who considers Greenpeace terrorists. All of the civilized world does. When France initiated some nuclear testing, Greenpeace tried to interfere, and got one of their boats shot all to hell, it sank. In the US, the FBI, other law enforcement considers them terrorists. See Operation Backfire (FBI) for more and/or go to this link: www.fbi.gov/page2/jan06/elf012006.htm which is the last known info on this law enforcement operation, status of which is Active/Ongoing. All of the known "Eco-Terrorists orgs and those not mentioned here are being infiltrated, to take them down. IF you're in one of these orgs, its best to GET OUT and wait for the heat to die down. 65.163.112.128 (talk) 17:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not mean to be hard on you, just stating that when these people are caught, they either end up in jail and/or in a mental hospital. 65.163.112.128 (talk) 17:10, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:RobertKaiser vs User:RK

Hi: Who is User:RobertKaiser and who is User:RK? Are you one and the same or different users or both? IZAK 09:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is not Robert Kaiser. He is a troll, pretending to be me.

If you have evidence of tolling, suggest you report this on WP:AN. If the primary issue is the name suggest WP:RFCN. Shabbat Shalom, --Shirahadasha 20:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop pretending to be me

Stop pretending to me, it is considered to be trolling and I will block you for it. RobertKaiser 21:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Back off RobertKaiser. You are being disruptive. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 02:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you review these articles?

Could you have a look at these articles and their talk?

I feel the articles are extremely well sourced and balanced. I'd like somebody else to remove the tags. Please look at my last versions, because I have run up against somebody from the evolution/creation universe who wants to pick a fight. --Metzenberg 03:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of pubs

As someone who has contributed to the talk page discussion on List of publications in philosophy and/or that article's previous deletion debate, I thought you might be interested in participating in its new nomination for deletion which can be found here. Thanks. - KSchutte 17:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serious discussions about using the names Reform vs. Progressive Judaism

Hi RK: Please see the present discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/open tasks#WikiProject Judaism needs help - geographical bias concerns. Your input would be greatly appreciated. (They are the result of discussions that unfolded at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Concern about duplicating Reform and Progressive labels.) Thanks so much, IZAK 08:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An interesting AfD

Hello. You may be interested in commenting on this Afd and contributing to it's associated discussion.Ghanadar galpa (talk) 22:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question for RK

I am interested in some information you wrote in the "Semicha" article. You wrote "A minority of Jewish writers maintain that a form of the original semicha continued to be practiced in small numbers as late as the eleventh century CE"( Posted by RK, 21:33, 24 August 2004).

This comment has recently been removed for lack of citation.

I am very interested in the source of this information or anything else at all you may be able to share with me about it.

You may answer on the Talk Page or feel free to contact me at the following email address: CWatchman2@gmail.com

Thank you very much,

CWatchman (talk) 03:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Binding of Isaac article name change

Thanks for your comments and contributions at Binding of Isaac. About 3 weeks ago, I proposed to change the name of the article to "Sacrifice of Isaac" at Talk:Binding of Isaac#Name of this article, but so far haven't seen any response. I plan to go ahead and rename the article on March 20, 2008 unless there are objections. I invite you to visit the article and submit any comments you have on the matter. Thanks! --Bryan H Bell (talk) 17:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Five editors have responded to the proposal described above. Four oppose and one is neutral. The consensus is opposed to the name change. I'll therfore leave the article as currently named ("Binding of Isaac") and consider the matter closed. --Bryan H Bell (talk) 03:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of User:RK/A Liberal Defense of Zionism

A proposed deletion template has been added to the page User:RK/A Liberal Defense of Zionism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this page may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Miscellany for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 01:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter

This newsletter was automatically delivered by ShepBot because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) on 04:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gabriel J. Chin

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gabriel J. Chin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TN‑X-Man 15:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 02:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Judaism Newsletter

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, ~~barnstars~~, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique[approves|this|message] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rebbe Nachman of Breslov

Hello. I saw that you once edited the above page. I have decided to submit this article to peer review in order to qualify for Featured Article status. Would you kindly click on the above link and add your comments or suggestions? Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 21:30, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many many thanks

You did a wonderful job in your section on 20th & 21st century commentaries. You trod in waters that I was afraid to tread in. I avoided the moderns by only including commentaries printed in a Mikraot Gedolot, and I didn't realize that would confine me to Hebrew. Now I feel free to put in sections about Nechama Leibovits, Umberto Cassuto, etc. Again, thanks for pulling me out of a rut as well as the research you did.

I am going to make a few changes though. I don't think the appendices to the Etz Hayim belong in this article. Also I don't know how much overlap there is between the Etz Hayim and the new JPS commentary/translation. Just know that nothing I say is written in stone, and I'm almost always open to suggestions. Phil_burnstein (talk) 04:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Torah Judaism and Daat Miqra

Robert, thanks for giving me the benefit of the doubt. As far as the Daat Miqra goes, I wish there were an English translation. That would be an incredible thing. Unfortunately, none exists that I know of. That'd be a fascinating project, though. I wonder if Mossad Harav Kook would be interested in it. They do the Daat Miqra series, no? -LisaLiel (talk) 04:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

I found your old user page while checking out some old deleted contributions. I have history merged it, so that all edits are in one place. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 12:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright question

Hi. Another contributor has noted a similarity between the page Hillel the Elder, which you contributed way back in 2003, and the Jewish Encyclopedia article, which bears a copyright notice of 2002. I have confirmed substantial duplication of text, so I've blanked the article pending some clarification of the matter. Can you help provide any clarification on this issue and the origin of this text? --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting for bypassers (since I have mailed the contributor): I've clarified this one for myself. Notwithstanding the copyright notice, the material is public domain. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I've just proposed merging Unification Church and antisemitism (which you worked on) into Divine Principle. Please join in the discussion, if you like. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Page layout Or Hadash.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Page layout Or Hadash.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 23:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Or Hadash covers.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Or Hadash covers.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 23:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Silver Bridge (bridge)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Silver Bridge (bridge), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Silver Bridge. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Page layout Or Hadash.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Page layout Or Hadash.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 11:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Or Hadash covers.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Or Hadash covers.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 11:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Ultra-Orthodox" in Haredi article (courtesy note)

You contributed to a past discussion about the term "Ultra-Orthodox" on the Haredi Judaism page. I removed the content in Haredi Judaism that claimed that "Ultra-Orthodox" is pejorative. I have explained my reasons on the talk page. -shirulashem^(talk) 15:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sirach article

In an 18 May 2003 edit to the Sirach article you added the /* Reference */ section with Amidah, entry in the Encyclopedia Judaica, Keter Publishing. The article has been considerably changed since then. I am not sure what that reference was intended as. Any help you could provide would be appreciated. Please reply, if appropriate, at Talk:Sirach#Sources and citations. Thanks. --Bejnar (talk) 21:50, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish philosophy

If you're still active here, can you take a look at Jewish philosophy? There's an editor turning the piece into a complete ploughed field... Jheald (talk) 17:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jewish fundamentalism

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jewish fundamentalism. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish fundamentalism. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your Intro

You quote .P._Lovecraft: "We know nothing except through logical analysis, and if we reject that sole connexion with reality, we might as well stop trying to be adults and retreat into the capricious dream-world of infantility." This seems incorrect. We know our consciousness exists with a visceral self-awareness. There is no logical analysis. An anti-Nietzschean argument but still.......38.117.213.19 (talk) 20:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

I've nominated List of former Jews, List of former Christians, and List of former Muslims together for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of former Jews.Kitfoxxe (talk) 16:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chabad on Wikipedia arbitration request

Since you have been kind enough to comment at the unresolved WP:COI case at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/User:Yehoishophot Oliver, you may wish to know that it has now been nominated for arbitration. Feel free to review at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Chabad movement editors and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thank you for your input and patience, IZAK (talk) 09:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration case opens/Chabad movement

Hi RK: Since you have been involved in the topic of Chabad, this is to let you know that an official arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement. You may wish to add your comments for the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement/Evidence. The ArbCom asks that evidence be submitted within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement/Workshop. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 06:06, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello RK! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Jack Wertheimer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Reuven Hammer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
William E. Kaufman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Neil Gillman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jules Harlow - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Motion to dismiss or keep the Chabad editors case

Hi RK: A discussion has started if the Chabad editors case should be dismissed or should remain open. As someone who has been involved in the serious COI discussions leading up to this ArbCom case you should be informed of this motion and have the right to explain if you agree or disagree with this proposed motion and why. Please see Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement/Evidence#Contemplated motion to dismiss. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 07:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jacob Neusner bibliography

The article Jacob Neusner bibliography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

out of scope

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 00:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Jacob Neusner bibliography

I have nominated Jacob Neusner bibliography, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Neusner bibliography (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ysangkok (talk) 10:52, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Living Torah and Nach article

In the Living Torah and Nach article you wrote, "Rabbi Kaplan's translation has been criticised for mis-translating the text. The dispute comes about because Kaplan consciously attempted not to present a straight translation of the text, but rather interspersing the translation with later rabbinic commentary and Jewish law." You did not source this information. I am writing another article in which I quoted your above-mentioned statement. I was confronted about this statement and was asked for sources which I was unable to find. Could you please assist me in finding this source or sources?

Thank you very much. CWatchman (talk) 03:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dark energy star

Since you seem to think that "dark star" is a synonym for this, you might want to create a redirect dark star (dark energy) to it. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 05:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aristotelian view of God

The article Aristotelian view of God has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Portion of the article on Aristotle & "Metaphysics" doesn't seem to mention God.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Editor2020 (talk) 02:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Documentary hypothesis

You might like to message User:TomS TDotO and ask for his views, since he's been active as an editor. You might also like to look at the Torah section in the article Authorship of the bible - mostly for some useful books on the subject.

You're welcome to edit the article as you please - Wikipedia is open to all. PiCo (talk) 11:26, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 14:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bible

Happy New Year. If you have time can you look at this section of the talk page and the sections that follow it (all created in the past couple of days, esp the current conflict with Telpardec)? Thanks, Slrubenstein | Talk 10:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jewish views on astrology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jewish views on astrology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish views on astrology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MakeSense64 (talk) 13:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of books by Jacob Neusner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of books by Jacob Neusner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of books by Jacob Neusner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move: Alternative medicine → Complementary and alternative medicine

Request initiated for the article Alternative medicine to be moved to Complementary and alternative medicine. I'm notifying you as major contributor to the article. Relevant talk page discussion found here. FiachraByrne (talk) 02:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Silver Bridge Advisors

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Silver Bridge Advisors, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Unforgettableid (talk) 07:52, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 09:33, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Haggadah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proof that Nazis deliberately killed six million Jews listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Proof that Nazis deliberately killed six million Jews. Since you had some involvement with the Proof that Nazis deliberately killed six million Jews redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tavix | Talk 04:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gog and Magog

Hi RK. I just reverted an edit of yours at Gog and Magog, for reasons given in the edit summary - it was pretty hard to read for anyone not already acquainted with Rabbinic literature, and seemed to cover material already dealt with in the second para of the following sections. However, if you could do some research into more recent sources, it could lead to a useful stand-alone section section on Jewish treatment of Gog/Magog through to the modern period. Let me know if you'd like to take this on. PiCo (talk) 05:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History of religious Jewish music talk page

Please see my question on the talk page for History of religious Jewish music.

Thanks, Moshe פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 15:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RK. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish neopaganism

You're a vandal. Stop adding Kohenet Institute into article about paganism, when it doesn't pagan organization. --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 19:29, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're a pathological liar. You are lying about the words of the women in Kohenet, and lying that they are Orthodox Jews. Stop this vandalism. RK (talk)

I never tell something like that and I going to report this to the administration. --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 14:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Feminist Judaism

Do you ever read the pages, that you used as sources? Look, the Kohenet Institute says: "Kohenet Hebrew Priestess Institute reclaims and innovates embodied, earth-based feminist Judaism." [4]. The JWeekly says: "[...] Kohenet women say that by exploring a feminist perspective, they’re actually drawing some women back, or deeper, into Judaism — not turning them away from it, or even necessarily inventing something new." [5]. It's clear that Kohenet isn't a Pagan or Neopagan organization, but a Feminist Judaistic. What are you don't understand it that? --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 12:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ethics in the Bible for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethics in the Bible is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethics in the Bible until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Softlavender (talk) 06:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RK. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear RK,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 02:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where O where

...did the lengthy material that you posted in 2002, to create the "Crypto-Jews" article, come from? It now significantly populates the article for the Marrano, and it is a blight on the encyclopedia. Perhaps, as you celebrate your 15th, you can join us in celebrating WP:VERIFY, and instead of forcing others to do second-best, follow-on, guesswork sourcing of this original material, you can own up, and honestly state where it is you drew it from in the first place. Please. It is the first entry on your "Things to remember when writing on Wikipedia" list, on your User page. For the sake of the encyclopedia, its quality, and honest scholarship. 2601:246:C700:9B0:302C:E77E:31EC:5050 (talk) 04:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"9/11 conspiracy theories regarding Jews or Israel" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 9/11 conspiracy theories regarding Jews or Israel. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 6#9/11 conspiracy theories regarding Jews or Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 18:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Nazi" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nazi. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 6#Nazi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. PyroFloe (talk) 16:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Names of God in Judaism

Greetings!

I couldn't help noticing that you made the following edit at Names of God in Judaism on 15 April, 2003 — that is, precisely 18 years and 2 months ago ... wow! Anyways, the addition goes as follows[6]:

However, R. Jose considered tzevaot a common name (Soferim iv. 1; Yer. R. H. i. 1; Ab. R. N. xxxiv). R. Ishmael held that even Elohim is common (Sanh. 66a). All other names, such as Merciful, Gracious, and Faithful, merely represent attributes that are common also to human beings (Sheb. 35a).

I was wondering if you were willing to help to clarify the source a bit? It's been tagged ever since September 2015 with a {{clarify}} template, and so far I've been able to decipher — if you may — the first part of the reference, Soferim, 4:1. But what the latter abbreviations stand for or where are they referring to, I have no idea...

So if you could write open those abbreviations (Yer. R. H. 1:1; Ab. R. N. 34; Sheb. 35a) — or even better offer a link to the sources — that'd be more than welcome! When it comes to Sanh. 66a, I could find it over the Internet as well, but something a bit more detailed than a range of 27 verses would be needed.

Thanks a lot in advance!

Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 14:52, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Private Asset Management

The article Private Asset Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this meets WP:NPERIODICAL. No independent coverage or indication of awards won or anything like that. Parent publisher Pageant Media doesn't have an article, so can't redirect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]