User talk:QuandaleDingleberry

Jellybean (YouTuber) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jellybean (YouTuber), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:36, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jellybean (YouTuber) (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent sources. Note that the number of viewers, subscribers, etc for a social media account does not say anything about a person's notability (as Wikipedia defines notability).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jellybean (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 18:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, QuandaleDingleberry! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 18:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orlando Guardians

Hello! I updated the New York Guardians page to reflect the teams relocation without knowing you were making a new one simultaneously, so now we have 2 Orlando Guardians pages. What is the best way to move forward to least complicate this. Camelboiis (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I moved the pages and everything should be fixed now. Thank you for helping and notifying me. QuandaleDingleberry (talk) 18:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright awesome thank you for fixing this mess! It is very much appreciated!Camelboiis (talk) 18:24, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:NflFanInEditing per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NflFanInEditing. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 19:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Orlando Guardians for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orlando Guardians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orlando Guardians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aoidh (talk) 22:37, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]