User talk:Psychopompologist

This is Psychopompologist's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While he is likely to be notable a biography really needs more than a pair of references Probably the list if edited books could be trimmed to the most significant.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Psychopompologist/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Psychopompologist! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Psychopompologist/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Psychopompologist/sandbox. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Douglas Cairns (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough independent, significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Douglas Cairns and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 18:09, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Douglas Cairns has been accepted

Douglas Cairns, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 00:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Professor of Classics (Edinburgh)

The article Professor of Classics (Edinburgh) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N, article created potentially for the purposes of WP:RESUME. Not a named Professorship/Chair and concerned the precedence this article may set with every professorship at every university warranting an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EmyRussell (talk) 21:58, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Emy,

I have replied on the talk page. I have improved the page, and addressed some issues (like referencing), but the principal reason for deletion simply did not follow from former precedent on Wikipedia, going back many years, without even highlighting the significance of this Chair and its holders (e.g., Blackie). The Chair is an established Chair (the idea that a 'named' professorship somehow warranting an article but an established Chair dating from 1708 not seems entirely incoherent), and was not created for the purposes of WP:RESUME.

All the best,

Dominic Psychopompologist (talk) 01:42, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NB. I have also deleted your deletion request for Glasgow's Professor of Humanity. If it is policy to delete established Chairs simply because they do not have a donors name, then half the articles of Professorships will, alas, also have to be deleted. Psychopompologist (talk) 01:43, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]