User talk:Priy.Kaushik

Welcome!

Hello, Priy.Kaushik! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 14:16, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

@Peaceray thanks for your advise . I'll surely work on my shortcomings Priy.Kaushik (talk) 14:49, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know I have many of my own! Peaceray (talk) 15:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceray you told me about being adopted by more experienced users and i am seeing that you too are very experienced. So , can you adpot me ? Priy.Kaushik (talk) 15:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceray please reply about adopting Priy.Kaushik (talk) 02:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am willing give advice& guidance. I have some things in which I am well versed, such as crafting citations, finding online books when available, populating biographical Wikidata records, reverting vandalism, & welcoming newly registered editors. I am also familiar with using templates of various sorts, although there is such a number of templates that I do not think I will see the majority of them. I have also done translation work. & I consider myself something of a WikiGnome. I am also involved in user groups such as Cascadia Wikimedians, WikiConference North America, &WALRUS. You can see more about me at my user page & at User:Peaceray/Barnstars+UserBoxes.

What are your interests & on what would you like to concentrate? Peaceray (talk) 04:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceray I am a 11 standard student . I scored a decent percentage of 97% in my 10 standard boards ( Board is a examination taken by CBSE in India ) . I want experience and knowledge of people like you . I have interest in subjects Physics , Biology and chemistry. I am quite new to Wikipedia and I want to develop my social skills . Priy.Kaushik (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some things to see.

WikiProjects

On the subject of citations

Wikipedia:Reliable sources
Wikipedia:Citation templates
https://citer.toolforge.org/citer.fcgi Will format URL/DOI/ISBN, PMID, PMCID, or OCLC numbers for you
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) (Although I think the Index Medicus tilts towards Western sources too much.)

Manual of Style

MOS:MOS

Presentations that I have given

@Peaceray Thanks for the help 😃 Priy.Kaushik (talk) 05:56, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Cleopatra, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see MOS:OVERLINK. Peaceray (talk) 14:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Solution (chemistry), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 23:59, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks you must've seen what i had done . that think was related to echinoderms ,i.e, Zoology. you should have seen that solution article is related to chemistry and that was a wrong template given there and yes i forgot to give edit summary sorry for that Priy.Kaushik (talk) 00:24, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i mean that 'thing' not 'think' Priy.Kaushik (talk) 00:30, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The exact purpose of a hat-note is to point to unrelated meanings of the same term (see Wikipedia:Hatnote). The word "solute" has a meaning other than the chemistry concept, but the wiki-link solute goes to the chemistry article. So if a reader wants the zoology meaning instead, the hat-note points them there. Please read the instructions at {{Redirect}} and you will see that this is the correct use. Note that in my edit-summary I actually said this already.

Your edits

Hi. Please be more careful when making edits. This is incorrect, and this introduces two errors ("anullus" is not Latin, "annelidian" is not correct English). 130.208.182.103 (talk) 15:28, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@130.208.182.103 as far as i know and as i have already confirmed from some books .so...........you know Priy.Kaushik (talk) 15:51, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]