Jump to content

User talk:Princhest

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

[edit]
Hello Princhest! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! ≈ jossi ≈ t • @
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 04:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re-fixed the cite template

[edit]

Hi Princhest, I have re-fixed your citation of Bookreviews.com on Gandhi Behind the Mask of Divinity page so that it shows up correctly in the "References" sections. The way it was before and after my earlier fix, would show up in error in the "References" section. Thanks, --Roadahead (talk) 18:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for for edit waring over Guru Arjan Dev and Gandhi Behind the Mask of Divinity. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 01:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An edit war occurs when individual editors or groups of editors repeatedly revert each other's edits to a page or subject area. Deliberate engagement in edit warring instead of discussion is considered a breach of Wikiquette and may cause a user to be blocked from editing. Attempts to win content disputes through brute force undermine the consensus-building process that underlies the ideal wiki collaborative spirit.
Wikipedia works best when people with opposing opinions work together to find common ground. Our neutral point of view requires that all significant views can and should be documented proportionally. An edit war is the opposite of this, with two sides each fighting to make their version the only one. (Borrowed from Wikipedia:Edit war) ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 01:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contest this Block

[edit]

{{unblock|The User:Goingoveredge is following my edits on Wikipedia like stalker and is vandalising my contributions with brute force without any initiation of discussion or desire to share signifacant views. User:Goingoveredge has been vandalising the article on Guru Arjan Dev and Gandhi:Behind the Mask of Divinity with malicious and propagandous attacks on Sikhs. There has been no constructive response from the User:Goingoveredge that could lead us to form a consensus. Rather, he seems to be fanatically bent to cause damage to the my contributions. I contest this block and would urge the admin to press User:Goingoveredge to form a consensus rather than indiscriminate attacks .

See:http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Gandhi_Behind_the_Mask_of_Divinity#Warning_.2FWatch_.5B.7C_User:Goingoveredge.5D

user:Princhest 10:11 28 August 2008, (UTC)

Use of talk pages

[edit]

Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 23:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3rr

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gandhi Behind the Mask of Divinity. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Goingoveredge (talk) 07:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sikh extremism

[edit]

An article recently created on Sikhs, i.e. Sikh extremism, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikh extremism. Thank you. Singh6 (talk) 08:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please give your vote Delete or Keep and participate in the discussion at Articles_for_deletion/Sikh_extremism. I believe this article is specifically created with bad faith. The editors of this article are famous for vandalizing Sikhism related articles, and they have been blocked several times as well. I think following links should be enough to disclose the true face of these Anti-Sikhism fundamentalists:
Please give you vote ... at Articles_for_deletion/Sikh_extremism. Please feel free to leave me a message if you have any question :) --Singh6 (talk) 03:48, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Would you please add and activate an Email into your wiki account. This email address will not be visible to other editors but it will help you to stay on top of any messages which you might miss otherwise, or please send me an email.--Singh6 (talk) 11:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Email

[edit]

please add an email account into ur preferences so that other editors can send you emails as well. I need to send some email--24.5.223.37 (talk) 05:41, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Comments on article you were involved in AFD debate

[edit]

Hi there! You had participated in the AFD on Sikh Extremism. I've had some time to look into the article and commented on the talk page here. Thanks, --RoadAhead =Discuss= 01:07, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sukhdev Singh Babbar

[edit]

Kindly pay attention to Talk:Sukhdev Singh Babbar. Respected Sir, I understand that you must be busy in your life but I still request you to pay your kind attention towards Sukhdev Singh Babbar.

I had come across its AfD discussion several months ago, so I completely re-wrote the article, inserted plenty of world level references and ‘was able to save it by proving its notability. I had recently requested a neutral editor to simply restructure it with sub-sections so that it could get better ratings (It has been awarded rating level "B")

This article is an excellent example of collective Indian attrocities on Khalistan movement people and their family members. There are "torture/harassment/un-lawfull custody incidents of Mr. Babbar's family members etc", "Indian Police even illegally occupied Mr. Babbar's house immediately after his death. Every single sentence/incident in this article is strongly referenced which bring culprit government and its illegal/cruel acts into light. It also show how Indian sucurity forces openely violated law of the land in Mr. Babbar's case. (Again referenced)

Since every single sentence is fully referenced, hence! after finding no other excuse, Vivin even tried to get certain part of this article deleted by putting one excuse or the another, so that he could suppress the referenced truth, 'could make it pro-Indian and 'could hide the fully referenced crimes of world's largest democracy, which is definitely a WP:NPOV issue. There is no personal research and article simply state what is there in the references. Since every sentence is referenced, hence you will not have to do any extra research. Please watch Sukhdev Singh Babbar and its talk page, i.e. Talk:Sukhdev Singh Babbar. --Singh6 (talk) 01:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Princhest&oldid=1087675794"