User talk:Pratiwiki

January 2025

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Prayagraj. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (^{talk to me!}/_{my edits}) 09:38, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pratiwiki! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Allahabad and marked it as "minor", when you knew that it was a controversial edit. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Prayagraj. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Cabayi (talk) 10:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That Abo yemen guy made personal attacks on many people by calling them blinded by rss, modi etc. And you didn't remove his sh*t. Pratiwiki (talk) 02:32, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Others' bad behaviour does not waive the guidelines for you. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (^{talk to me!}/_{my edits}) 14:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just be fair. Don't waive the guidelines. Enforce them equally. Pratiwiki (talk) 20:06, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm SerChevalerie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Goa, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SerChevalerie (talk) 02:46, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Execution of Sambhaji. Imperial ^[AFCND] 05:36, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 09:06, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=My work of removing the text from pages which were backed by unreliable sources and were just mere stories without any sources in no way suggests that I'm here to spread or incite hate. I believe, to keep Wikipedia reliable, the texts without reliable sources should be removed or it shouldn't contain baseless theories which are only there to spread hate. My work focuses of removing such contents which i described above. I'm not here to incite or spread hate. In fact I'm only doing the opposite of it. I request you to unblock me so i can continue my work and add reliability to Wikipedia pages. Pratiwiki (talk) 14:57, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pratiwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My work of removing the text from pages which were backed by unreliable sources and were just mere stories without any sources in no way suggests that I'm here to spread or incite hate. I believe, to keep Wikipedia reliable, the texts without reliable sources should be removed or it shouldn't contain baseless theories which are only there to spread hate. My work focuses of removing such contents which i described above. I'm not here to incite or spread hate. In fact I'm only doing the opposite of it. I request you to unblock me so i can continue my work and add reliability to Wikipedia pages. Pratiwiki (talk) 14:58, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This comment completely disqualifies you from participating here. Please take your religious bigotry elsewhere. You are not welcome here. 331dot (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.