User talk:Poya-P/Archive 1

Archive 1

IP

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Poya-P (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. Dear managers I am a user of wikifa and have no problem with it. I have loaded new articles and also added to Wikipedia articles. But when I want to work in English wiki I have problem in editing the text and I am faced with a message. However my i.p has no problem and it seems there has been a mistake. So hereby I request the managers to open my i.p so that I can expand my work . Yours sincerely, . Poya-P (talk) 22:17, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only - editor will be submitting their request via UTRS due to privacy concerns regarding revealing their IP here. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:35, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• We can't do anything unless you tell us your IP (go here to find out). If you don't want to make it public, you can use WP:UTRS. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks you I do not have any problem giving my IP to Wiki, Tell me where to put or give it to you, ThanksPoya-P (talk) 23:57, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

You can modify your unblock request and give your IP address there. --Yamla (talk) 10:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Dear manager, I do not have any problem giving my IP to you and Wiki managers, But I don't want to make it public.Poya-P (talk) 15:28, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

No managers here, just volunteers. :) You are welcome to use WP:UTRS in that case! --Yamla (talk) 16:26, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Poya-P (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #18033 was submitted on Apr 14, 2017 13:46:39. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this userright to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked (through the use of CheckUser) periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gregor Yeghikian

The article Gregor Yeghikian has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 23:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Gregor Yeghikian

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Gregor Yeghikian. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Gregory Yeghikian. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gregory Yeghikian. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 00:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Shahnaz Azad) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Shahnaz Azad, Poya-P!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A worthwhile addition to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:10, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

@Cwmhiraeth: , Hi, Thank you for your attention to this article. I'm trying to upgrade my work, sincerely yours. Poya-P (talk) 21:07, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in Red

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.63% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for May: Women of the Sea Villains Women in Sport Central Eastern European women #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 09:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Zainab Pasha

Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Poya-P, thanks for creating Zainab Pasha!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It would be useful to have some dates to give context to readers who do not know the history of this region.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Cwmhiraeth: , Hi, Thank you for your attention to this article. Poya-P (talk) 08:56, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Poya-P. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Iranian politics general sanctions notice

Please read this notification carefully: it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions to curtail disruption in articles related to post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed. Before continuing to make edits that involve this topic, please read the full description of these sanctions here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

@Vanamonde93:,Hi,

I have been away from editing for some time. I am now surprised to see this message, as all my edits have been in accordance with Wikipedia policies. Therefore, I don’t see myself subject to such a message.

Regards. Poya-P (talk) 00:42, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

@Poya-P: Please read the message more carefully. It is an informational notice, that is meant be given to anyone editing within this topic. It says nothing about the quality of your edits. If you continue to edit within policy, you have nothing to worry about. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:02, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Orman Ira Platnick

A tag has been placed on Orman Ira Platnick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Comment move

Hey, I see you moved your comment, but that's problematic for two reasons. First, I had responded to your comment and you seemed to have moved your original comment but not my response, which makes things confusing. Second, you moved your comment to the top of this section Talk:People's_Mujahedin_of_Iran#Removing_MEK_popularity_from_lead_and_WP:DUE. Generally, comments are placed at the bottom of the section so that the earlier comments are at the top and the later ones are at the bottom. Please fix. Thanks!VR _talk 18:25, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Stefka Bulgaria the result of the above move created a problem, how do you propose we fix it? If there is no agreement, I will simply move my own comments around to maintain both chronological order and reply order.VR _talk 16:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Ok, I'll fix it. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 17:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

I fixed it. Poya-P (talk) 18:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks :-) Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 18:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks.VR _talk 18:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 13:56, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Rchard2scout, Hi, thanks for trying to help me. Poya-P (talk) 01:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Captions

Hey, thanks for your contributions to French Resistance. Regarding when to use final punctuation in captions, please see MOS:CAPTION. Also, piping links is usually not necessary: see WP:NOPIPE and WP:NOTBROKEN. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 06:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Mathglot, Hi, You are right, captions should end without a point, but in this certain article I saw that most of captions already have a point, so it would look nicer if the few remaining would also end with a point.

Anyway, thanks for trying to improve my work on Wikipedia. Poya-P (talk) 01:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Poya-P – keen observation that some of the captions already had them! Actually, some of them *should* have a point, but there's a subtle distinction involved: when the caption is a full, grammatical sentence (subject, verb, predicate) that would normally have a point after it in running text, then it should have one in the caption. In a couple of cases, there *were* such complete sentences, and those properly had them. However, there were other cases of sentence fragments or noun phrases that weren't complete sentences, but had the punctuation anyway, possibly in an attempt to be consistent with the ones that had them. Which is maybe the same trap that you fell into. In any case, this is one of the more dusty, and inconsequential corners of the big pile of rules around here, so I wouldn't worry too much about it. Since I saw you working on an article I enjoy, I thought it worth mentioning (just barely ). Thanks again for your contributions! Mathglot (talk) 01:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Mathglot, Hi, thanks. Poya-P (talk) 01:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Mathglot, Hi, I wouldn't worry. Pleas look this in French Resistance: "German military and résistants, July, 1944". Regards. Poya-P (talk) 02:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)