User talk:PopCultureSuperHero

Hello, PopCultureSuperHero, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ronz (talk) 00:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi PopCultureSuperHero. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 00:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My Response: Thats ok, it is inconvenient but all info can easily be gotten from individual sources. Thanks for the input!--PopCultureSuperHero (talk) 02:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline template

I don't work much with templates, and do almost nothing with visual presentations like what you're trying to accomplish. The welcome template above gives you lots of options on where to go for help.

Since you are interested in working on biographical articles, I strongly advise that you work through some tutorials. Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons has very strict and special requirements that make working on such articles very difficult for anyone, let alone a new editor.

Sorry I couldn't be of more help with your template. --Ronz (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My Response: Thanks Ronz, I will take a look at those tutorials. If you come across anyone that might be able to help me with my template please send them my way! --PopCultureSuperHero (talk) 17:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PDK Films (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Youtube cannot be used as a reliable reference on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PDK Films and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PDK Films, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 05:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PopCultureSuperHero! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 05:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SSSniperwolf (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Much like your previous submission, Youtube cannot be used as a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SSSniperwolf and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SSSniperwolf, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 05:15, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matthew Fredrick (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matthew Fredrick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Matthew Fredrick, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 05:18, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boostinsider (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many of your sources eg. Google Play isn't suitable. Moreover, the Products section would be advertising.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boostinsider and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Boostinsider, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 05:20, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SocialBlade (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

twitter.com isnt a reliable source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SocialBlade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SocialBlade, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 05:20, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unbox Therapy (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Unbox Therapy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Unbox Therapy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 05:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission and about sourcing

On Wikipedia, articles require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The sources you find must at least be one lengthy paragraph, preferably more and not just passing mentions or directory listings. Next, the published sources you find must have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Eg. a major newspaper, a factual, widely-published book, high-quality generally trusted mainstream publications and not blogs, MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, fansites, Twitter, wikis, or other sites with user-generated content. Lastly, sources must be nothing written by the subject, paid for by the subject, or affiliated with the subject which will not be their own website/homepages, and not a press release. The sources must be independent. It is crucial that you read those links in blue and also those attached with the declined reason. publications. Here are some examples: Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Cheers. EROS ^message 08:44, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Thank you for your feedback. I have read those links and I still have a question, and I'm sorry for repeating myself, because its the same one I asked on your talk page. Is it not necessary that I provide sources just to prove that something exists? For instance, if I find an article talking about a social media star's particular youtube video, that is all I need? I don't need to prove that the video actually exists by linking to it. The same for Twitter. If a new publication is reporting about a controversial tweet, I don't have to source the tweet itself to prove its existence, the article is enough? I've browsed many of the other Wiki's made about YouTubers before starting my project, and I did not like them. They never source the video they are talking about. I always thought that very poor editing. If you are talking about a specific video that picked up media coverage, then it would make since to reference the video itself. However, that is my opinion. So I guess I may be answering my own question here, but just to be clear, I don't have to actually source the material I'm discussing?

Thank you for your help and patience.--PopCultureSuperHero (talk) 20:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is it very necessary that you provide sources to prove that something exists. You have to source materials about what you are discussing. And those sources/materials must be within Wikipedia's scope of rules. You obviously have different understanding of sourcing than what is expected on Wikipedia. As to your question of proving if the video exist, YES. You must prove that what you are talking about the video exist. There must be supporting evidence to the facts about the video. However, on Wikipedia, it is not essential to source the video that the author is talking about. Putting the Youtube link to the paragraph about the video would be considered as primary source, which is very much discouraged on Wikipedia and will be rejected. I suggest you read about sourcing and referencing with links embedded on your submission page. I also suggest you to ask for clarity and help on the Help Desk for AfC, which link you can find at the declination banner of any of your declined submissions. They might provide you with better enlightenment and understanding. Cheers. EROS ^message 15:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Eros, that helped!--PopCultureSuperHero (talk) 23:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SocialBlade (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vermont was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SocialBlade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SocialBlade, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{Vermont | reply here} 22:12, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vermont! Thank you for taking the time to review my article. I will try to make it better. Do you have any advice for me? Or would you care to set some time to help me? I could trade my services for yours, perhaps I can help you with a project if you could trade me some nifty advice! Thanks a bunch!--PopCultureSuperHero (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boostinsider (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TeaDrinker was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Although your efforts to improve the article are greatly appreciated, I'm afraid sources like PRNewswire and Yourstory, which generally feature press releases or articles by the company themselves, don't really meet the criteria as independent verifiable sources either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boostinsider and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Boostinsider, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TeaDrinker (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FameBit has been accepted

FameBit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 17:48, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Fredrick

Hi muscular man, I made it into article, as you said in your userpage, but SSSniperwolf and PDK films doesn't meet notability yet, and you can't anymore create SSSniperwolf into article because it was declared non-notable personality by the admins pls remove it into your draft list so you don't waste your time. I removed some youtube, twitter, facebook, twitch and daily mail sources, it was all unreliable sources. I already redirect your draft now in the main article. Thanks. Personale (talk) 02:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My Response: Hey dude, sorry for long reply. I actually have another WIKI account where I edit MMA stuff. I forgot I had created this one for Influencer stuff. Honestly, I spent a lot of time on the page and when none got approved I lost interest. But I appreciate your help! --PopCultureSuperHero (talk) 21:55, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Boostinsider

Hello, PopCultureSuperHero. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Boostinsider, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 12:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Boostinsider

Hello, PopCultureSuperHero. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Boostinsider".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:42, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elongate article

Hello User:PopCultureSuperHero, I'm reaching out because you're listed as a contributor to the Cryptocurrency WikiProject. I am trying to get a draft published in the Cryptocurrency domain, but it's a bit difficult as the reviewers seem to have an opposition to the topic of crypto as a whole. Meanwhile there are other topics published with significantly less notability. As you are knowledgeable on the subject, could you please look at the draft and let me know if you can assist? Thank you! http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:Elongate_(cryptocurrency)

Wikipedia Page

I’m a Greco Roman wrestler with a lot of accolades do you think you could help me with a page 2601:582:0:BF90:B9CC:6C98:34E7:812C (talk) 10:04, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]