Jump to content

User talk:Polavarapu Mokshith Sai

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 21:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Somnath temple ruins (1869.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Somnath temple ruins (1869.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Delhi Sultanate have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 00:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nizam-ul-Mulk, Asaf Jah I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baadal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot Thank you for the mistake which I want to fix but I make some mistakes and please next time it will not be repeated again and also thanks for the message you were given to me and from you is DPL Bot. Polavarapu Mokshith Sai (talk) 09:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Bhagavad Gita, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 23:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I noticed that you recently made an edit to World War I in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 02:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Somireddy Chandra Mohana Reddy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 12:48, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Somireddy Chandra Mohana Reddy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. All Biographies of living people require sources, please add some sourcing. Thanks! AusLondonder (talk) 13:01, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your edits to Ponguru Narayana are not an improvement. You added a large amount of unsourced material (see Wikipedia:Verifiability) and changed the tone of the article to be overly promotional. Also, please use accurate edit summaries (see Help:Edit summary) not just random letters. AusLondonder (talk) 13:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! AusLondonder (talk) 16:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Cold War in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 08:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Narayana Group of Educational Institutions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, NIT and Telugu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to [[:refer your user contributions]. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 456legendtalk 06:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Northern Moonlight 08:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 30 2024

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Polavarapu Mokshith Sai (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked from editing by Cullen328 for the following reason: - 1] Clearly mentioned to not here to build an encyclopedia. 2] Overtly writing non-neutral promotional editing including hundreds of instances of gibberish in edit summaries. 3] This block will not expire until I have to resolve this mistake on my home project. Good Reasons: - 4] I would like to request a change in my username. I have recently realized that my current username no longer represents my identity, and I would like to update it to something that better suits me. However, when I tried to change it from "Polavarapu Mokshith Sai" to "Somavarapu Mokshith Sai", it showed that the request could not be completed and is still in the process. 5] I have to write this article for unblocking me from editing and I have to resolve this mistake and I will not repeat again henceforth. -Polavarapu Mokshith Sai (talk) 11:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:48, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Information icon Hello, Polavarapu Mokshith Sai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Somireddy Chandra Mohana Reddy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ponguru Narayana

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Polavarapu Mokshith Sai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ponguru Narayana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ponguru Narayana

[edit]

Hello, Polavarapu Mokshith Sai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ponguru Narayana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Polavarapu Mokshith Sai (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I should be unblocked in Wikipedia due to the appreciation of the platform's goal to spread accurate with their well-founded and the neutral knowledge. Here is how I will relate to the purposes of Wikipedia: 1] Knowledge of Sharing: I will strive to provide the correct, neutral, and verifiable information from a wide range of reliable sources. That will support the idea of free knowledge creation and their sharing as pursued by the Wikipedia. 2] Collaboration: I will value my collaboration from many contributors in the Wikipedia and We will do better information for by achieved through the refining the information together. 3] Respecting the Norm: Though I am an editor for Wikipedia, I will respect their proper citation with avoidance of bias and maintaining the accuracy of the information. 4] Learning the Resource: The application will augmented the Wikipedia by taking the concepts or summarizing them and encouraging the person to delve further by using the resource like Wikipedia. Polavarapu Mokshith Sai (talk) 15:18, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Thank you for your unblock request. Could you go into more detail as to why you were blocked, and what you will do differently this time? PhilKnight (talk) 15:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Polavarapu Mokshith Sai (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked in editing in Wikipedia due to those reasons as given: -

1] Clearly mentioned to not here to build an encyclopedia 2] Overtly writing with the non-neutral promotional of editing including the hundreds of instances of gibberish in the edit summaries. *Steps to Avoid the Future Issues in Wikipedia: - To regain the trust and show commitment to Wikipedia’s principles, here’s what I would pledge to do: 1]Educate Myself on the Guidelines: I will Spend the time by reading the Wikipedia’s key policies especially from the Five Pillars with content guidelines, and behavioral expectations. 2]Use the Reliable Sources: I will adding the content that is well-sourced and meets the Wikipedia’s standards for the verifiability. 3]Collaborate with Respectfully: I will Engage in a constructively manners with other editors with by seeking the consensus and avoid the edit wars. 4]Avoid the Conflicts of Interest: I will Refrain from the editing topics where I have a personal stake. If necessary ask them to suggest edits on the article’s talk page instead. 5]Practice the Neutrality: I will Ensure that all my contributions are unbiased, fact-based, and balanced. 6]Seek Guidance: I will Ask the questions or seek help from more experienced editors on talk pages when uncertain about their policies or their appropriate edits. 7]Respect the Wikipedia’s Environment: We Will Uphold the respectful, collaborative atmosphere and report disruptions rather than engaging in them.

  • I should be unblocked in Wikipedia due to the appreciation of the platform's goal to spread the accurate with their well-founded and their neutral knowledge. Here is how I will relate to the purposes of Wikipedia: -

1] Knowledge of Sharing: I will strive to provide the correct, neutral, and verifiable information from a wide range of reliable sources. That will support the idea of free knowledge creation and their sharing as pursued by the Wikipedia. 2] Collaboration: I will value my collaboration from the many contributors in the Wikipedia and We will do better information for by achieved through the refining the information together. 3] Respecting the Norm: Though I am an editor for Wikipedia, I will respect their proper citation with avoidance of bias and maintaining the accuracy of the information.

4] Learning the Resource: The application will be augmented in Wikipedia by taking the concepts or summarizing them and encouraging the person to delve further by using the resource app like Wikipedia. Polavarapu Mokshith Sai (talk) 11:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have been blocked in editing in Wikipedia due to those reasons as given: - 1] Clearly mentioned to not here to build an encyclopedia 2] Overtly writing with the non-neutral promotional of editing including the hundreds of instances of gibberish in the edit summaries. *Steps to Avoid the Future Issues in Wikipedia: - To regain the trust and show commitment to Wikipedia’s principles, here’s what I would pledge to do: 1]Educate Myself on the Guidelines: I will Spend the time by reading the Wikipedia’s key policies especially from the Five Pillars with content guidelines, and behavioral expectations. 2]Use the Reliable Sources: I will adding the content that is well-sourced and meets the Wikipedia’s standards for the verifiability. 3]Collaborate with Respectfully: I will Engage in a constructively manners with other editors with by seeking the consensus and avoid the edit wars. 4]Avoid the Conflicts of Interest: I will Refrain from the editing topics where I have a personal stake. If necessary ask them to suggest edits on the article’s talk page instead. 5]Practice the Neutrality: I will Ensure that all my contributions are unbiased, fact-based, and balanced. 6]Seek Guidance: I will Ask the questions or seek help from more experienced editors on talk pages when uncertain about their policies or their appropriate edits. 7]Respect the Wikipedia’s Environment: We Will Uphold the respectful, collaborative atmosphere and report disruptions rather than engaging in them. *I should be unblocked in Wikipedia due to the appreciation of the platform's goal to spread the accurate with their well-founded and their neutral knowledge. Here is how I will relate to the purposes of Wikipedia: - 1] Knowledge of Sharing: I will strive to provide the correct, neutral, and verifiable information from a wide range of reliable sources. That will support the idea of free knowledge creation and their sharing as pursued by the Wikipedia. 2] Collaboration: I will value my collaboration from the many contributors in the Wikipedia and We will do better information for by achieved through the refining the information together. 3] Respecting the Norm: Though I am an editor for Wikipedia, I will respect their proper citation with avoidance of bias and maintaining the accuracy of the information. 4] Learning the Resource: The application will be augmented in Wikipedia by taking the concepts or summarizing them and encouraging the person to delve further by using the resource app like Wikipedia. [[User:Polavarapu Mokshith Sai|Polavarapu Mokshith Sai]] ([[User talk:Polavarapu Mokshith Sai#top|talk]]) 11:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been blocked in editing in Wikipedia due to those reasons as given: - 1] Clearly mentioned to not here to build an encyclopedia 2] Overtly writing with the non-neutral promotional of editing including the hundreds of instances of gibberish in the edit summaries. *Steps to Avoid the Future Issues in Wikipedia: - To regain the trust and show commitment to Wikipedia’s principles, here’s what I would pledge to do: 1]Educate Myself on the Guidelines: I will Spend the time by reading the Wikipedia’s key policies especially from the Five Pillars with content guidelines, and behavioral expectations. 2]Use the Reliable Sources: I will adding the content that is well-sourced and meets the Wikipedia’s standards for the verifiability. 3]Collaborate with Respectfully: I will Engage in a constructively manners with other editors with by seeking the consensus and avoid the edit wars. 4]Avoid the Conflicts of Interest: I will Refrain from the editing topics where I have a personal stake. If necessary ask them to suggest edits on the article’s talk page instead. 5]Practice the Neutrality: I will Ensure that all my contributions are unbiased, fact-based, and balanced. 6]Seek Guidance: I will Ask the questions or seek help from more experienced editors on talk pages when uncertain about their policies or their appropriate edits. 7]Respect the Wikipedia’s Environment: We Will Uphold the respectful, collaborative atmosphere and report disruptions rather than engaging in them. *I should be unblocked in Wikipedia due to the appreciation of the platform's goal to spread the accurate with their well-founded and their neutral knowledge. Here is how I will relate to the purposes of Wikipedia: - 1] Knowledge of Sharing: I will strive to provide the correct, neutral, and verifiable information from a wide range of reliable sources. That will support the idea of free knowledge creation and their sharing as pursued by the Wikipedia. 2] Collaboration: I will value my collaboration from the many contributors in the Wikipedia and We will do better information for by achieved through the refining the information together. 3] Respecting the Norm: Though I am an editor for Wikipedia, I will respect their proper citation with avoidance of bias and maintaining the accuracy of the information. 4] Learning the Resource: The application will be augmented in Wikipedia by taking the concepts or summarizing them and encouraging the person to delve further by using the resource app like Wikipedia. [[User:Polavarapu Mokshith Sai|Polavarapu Mokshith Sai]] ([[User talk:Polavarapu Mokshith Sai#top|talk]]) 11:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been blocked in editing in Wikipedia due to those reasons as given: - 1] Clearly mentioned to not here to build an encyclopedia 2] Overtly writing with the non-neutral promotional of editing including the hundreds of instances of gibberish in the edit summaries. *Steps to Avoid the Future Issues in Wikipedia: - To regain the trust and show commitment to Wikipedia’s principles, here’s what I would pledge to do: 1]Educate Myself on the Guidelines: I will Spend the time by reading the Wikipedia’s key policies especially from the Five Pillars with content guidelines, and behavioral expectations. 2]Use the Reliable Sources: I will adding the content that is well-sourced and meets the Wikipedia’s standards for the verifiability. 3]Collaborate with Respectfully: I will Engage in a constructively manners with other editors with by seeking the consensus and avoid the edit wars. 4]Avoid the Conflicts of Interest: I will Refrain from the editing topics where I have a personal stake. If necessary ask them to suggest edits on the article’s talk page instead. 5]Practice the Neutrality: I will Ensure that all my contributions are unbiased, fact-based, and balanced. 6]Seek Guidance: I will Ask the questions or seek help from more experienced editors on talk pages when uncertain about their policies or their appropriate edits. 7]Respect the Wikipedia’s Environment: We Will Uphold the respectful, collaborative atmosphere and report disruptions rather than engaging in them. *I should be unblocked in Wikipedia due to the appreciation of the platform's goal to spread the accurate with their well-founded and their neutral knowledge. Here is how I will relate to the purposes of Wikipedia: - 1] Knowledge of Sharing: I will strive to provide the correct, neutral, and verifiable information from a wide range of reliable sources. That will support the idea of free knowledge creation and their sharing as pursued by the Wikipedia. 2] Collaboration: I will value my collaboration from the many contributors in the Wikipedia and We will do better information for by achieved through the refining the information together. 3] Respecting the Norm: Though I am an editor for Wikipedia, I will respect their proper citation with avoidance of bias and maintaining the accuracy of the information. 4] Learning the Resource: The application will be augmented in Wikipedia by taking the concepts or summarizing them and encouraging the person to delve further by using the resource app like Wikipedia. [[User:Polavarapu Mokshith Sai|Polavarapu Mokshith Sai]] ([[User talk:Polavarapu Mokshith Sai#top|talk]]) 11:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Hi there, Polavarapu Mokshith Sai! Can you tell me what types of contributions you would like to add to Wikipedia? Perhaps you can give me an example of a specific edit you would like to make. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:57, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]