User talk:Pjb007

Global Lifeline

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Spook ^{(my talk | my contribs)} 11:59, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Global Lifeline

I noticed that Spook left you a note about your article Global Lifeline. I don't think his note explains the situation completely. He should have mentioned that Wikipedia is not just a list of links. Please read that article and also WP:WEB which explains what it takes to make a web site notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Remember, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and encyclpoedias are only supposed to include topics which are important. There are so many millions of web sites, that guidelines have had to be developed to decide which sites are notable enough to be included. Global Lifeline might be a very fine site, but in the end it fails WP:WEB. If you want to reply, please do so on my talk page.
— Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) – February 19, 2006, 22:33 (UTC)

Copyright Logos question

Your question about Copyright Logos has been answered. Feel free to ask for clarifiaction if you need more help.--Commander Keane 13:41, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editors

I have used Wikipedia for some time now and find the code a bit of a problem sometimes, is there any software that would help make it easier and less time consuming to get the design looking good on pages. pjb007 11:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. The place to ask questions about using Wikipedia, is Wikipedia:Help desk. You'll want to clarify your question a bit though: an example page would help provide context. I've glanced through a couple of your recent contributions, and it doesnt look like you are working on a graphical-layout (eg portal) design; so you probably mean you want help with typographical design? Headers and paragraph spacing and such? For that, I'd suggest the Wikipedia:Guide to layout or other parts of the Manual of Style. And otherwise, just examine&copy the wikicode of good articles.

I'll put a welcome template below, it has many useful/common links. Enjoy! -Quiddity 20:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Pjb007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Quiddity 20:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply, and for looking at my recent contributions, I have only done basic edits really, but would like to do a bit more than just simple editing

I thought some people used editors, as in the Recent Changes list there are some articles listed along with the text “using .....”, I just wondered which editor was best to use for design purposes. pjb007 20:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's an overwhelming list at Wikipedia:Tools/Editing tools, including Wikipedia:Tools/Browser tools (those others are using things like autowikibrowser which is more for experts, or popups which is kinda fun). I'm still not sure what you mean by "design purposes" though? If, for example, you just want more consistent whitespace, then only use a single blank line between paragraphs, instead of two :) --Quiddity 21:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick replies, looking at the links in your previous post I found this converter, which I think will be of great help.

pjb007 21:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

Re the question you asked at User_talk:Xaosflux#GUS_userboxes, I'll answer for Xaosflux (one less thing on his list of things to do):

The location of the userbox had changed from template space (Template:User male) to Userspace (User:MiraLuka/Userboxes/User male), per the German userbox solution - which is why xaosflux updated the userbox. I believe the edit summary explained it. If you need me to explain further or clarify, please comment on my talk or xaosflux's. — Nathan ^(talk) _{/ 23:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

Peter Kay article

Yeah it happens some times. Programs used also sometime register the wrong person. For example on my vandalism reversed list, there are at least 10 reversals that I did not credit for because someone else did it at the same time.Gdo01 19:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template redirect

The change was to replace an obsolete template with the new template to which it redirects, as explained in the edit summary. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 05:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Apprentice

Hello, Pjb007 and thank you for your contributions on articles related to The Apprentice UK. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Dalejenkins 21:26, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sibclogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Sibclogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your edits to Image:Sibclogo.gif and you did fix it correctly. However, you didn't remove the orange warning tag, so it still would've been deleted. I've gona and removed the tag since it is now compliant. MBisanz ^talk 01:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cfmtv logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cfmtv logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The severn.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The severn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:53, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]