User talk:Pardeeprorboy

Welcome!

Hello, Pardeeprorboy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Rasina

Your edits to Rasina have been reverted. If you want an article about the village in Haryana, please start a new page at Rasina, Kaithal. Please don't hijack existing pages. Also, please cite sources for all information you add to Wikipedia. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ror

Please do not copy/paste huge chunks of text from other websites, as you did at Ror. Please also note that jatland.com is not a reliable source and should not be used in any form. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 12:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so you have done it again. Please note the information below. - Sitush (talk) 12:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

January 2018

Your recent editing history at Ror shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 12:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit war over content at Ror. When content you're trying to add to an article is removed as inappropriate by another editor, the next step is to follow Wikipedia:Dispute resolution and discuss things on the article's talk page. If you continue to try and force this content into article and refuse to engage in discussion the following is likely to happen: (1) a discussion about your behavior will be started at one of the administrator noticeboards, (2) an administrator will review your recent edits and behavior, and (3) an adminstrator will block your account for editing to prevent any further disruption. Moreover, if you continue to try and copy-and-paste content found on other websites into the article in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy, your account will likely be indefinitely blocked from editing. Wikipedia is a colaborative editing project which means that editors are expected to discuss things with each other when there are disagreements over content, etc. Wikipedia also takes copyright matters very seriously and copyright violations are simply not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia. All editors are expected to edit according to Wikipedia's various policies and guidelines and those you are unable to do so are probably not going to last long as an editor. What happens from here on is completely up to you. I hope you will decide tp work contstructively with others in trying to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia because the alternative will not benefit you or Wikipedia. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

You cannot copy/paste the same stuff into your sandbox just because it has been reverted in the article itself. Please see WP:COPYRIGHT and, in any event, note that since jatland.com is unreliable it really is a rather pointless exercise. - Sitush (talk) 13:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Pardeeprorboy, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Ror have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bishonen | talk 14:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have also deleted your sandbox, as Wikipedia does not allow copyright violations on any page. Blanking the content, as Sitush did, is not enough. Bishonen | talk 14:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC).[reply]

You're not allowed to have more than one account

I've blocked the account User:Xpardeepror boy, as this account, Pardeeprorboy, is the older. Please note that if you continue to post copyright violations, this account will also be blocked. Do you have any other accounts than those two? Please name them below, if you have. Bishonen | talk 14:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC).[reply]