User talk:Optanks3

Your edits are violating multiple Wikipedia policies

I have asked you to discuss your edits at Talk:Michelle Fields#Today's edits since they violate Wikipedia policies including WP:VERIFY (in that you are adding uncited content), WP:SYNTH (in that you are taking selected facts to argue a case), WP:BLP (in that you're using someone's opinion statements to vilify an individual), and WP:NPOV (in that you're including a personal, POV description of a video). You also are using poor grammar in one sentence, in that you're using a form of "deny" repetitiously. I ask you to please discuss these contentious edits, rather than edit-war. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:53, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Michelle Fields

Hello. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Michelle Fields seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Safehaven86 (talk) 19:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

3RR

This is the required warning that if you commit one more revert at Corey Lewandowski you will be at WP:3RR and the issue will have to go the admins. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Reliable sourcing

Please avoid Breitbart as a source for facts - this is not a reliable source under our guidelines. Thanks. Neutrality^talk 21:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Really? Well, this same "Michelle Fields: In Her Own Words". Breitbart News. March 10, 2016" (see link below) source and link has been cited in this article repeatedly and consistently over dozens of past revisions for weeks (starting no later than: Revision as of 07:39, 11 March 2016) -- many of which revisions resulted from your editing. In fact, in removing my repeat citation to the "Michelle Fields: In Her Own Words". Breitbart News. March 10, 2016" article (see link below), along with the content which I added to the Wikipedia article based on it, and admonishing me not to cite to any Breitbart article -- even where, as here, it is simply the writer's personal account, not to mention that it is on a topic over which the reporter famously thereafter resigned from Breitbart of which she has nonetheless disavowed not a word of the source -- you apparently continue to approve of the pre-existing/prior citations to the same source as you left it, and it remains, undisturbed! So, for you to suggest citing to Breitbart in general and this article in particular constitutes unreliable sourcing is incredible. Optanks3 (talk) 00:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

References

July 2018

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Jared Kushner, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:25, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

I see you have have not paid attention to the sanctions above. Please revert your edit or you may be reported. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:52, 29 July 2018 (UTC) (please  mention me on reply; thanks!)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:Emir of Wikipedia, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:33, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Also please reply here instead of fragmenting the discussion. I have removed your comments from my talkpage. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:33, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

WP:SIGLINK

Your signature violates WP:SIGLINK as it doesn't link to a page of yours. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:22, 10 August 2018 (UTC) (please  mention me on reply; thanks!)

September 2019

Hello, I'm Gab4gab. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Marshall Academy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 04:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)