User talk:One Blue Hat

My talk page.

One Blue Hat, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi One Blue Hat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Hat Kid from A Hat in Time.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tagging

Don't tag any more pages for speedy deletion. You have insufficient experience.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:14, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? --One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 18:22, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See, e.g., Draft:Linophobia and Draft:Link Start!. WP:CSD#G1 is a "speedy deletion tag". Also, in the future, you don't have to leave a talkback notice on my Talk page if I've posted on yours.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So, should I XFD them? --One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 18:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn how to WP:INDENT your posts. For an inexperienced user, you're spending far too much time on inappropriate tasks, including posting warnings to other users, speedy tagging, requests for protection, and others. Nominating drafts for deletion is not something a user like you should even be thinking about doing. If I were you, I'd work on improving articles and gaining experience in that way.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi One Blue Hat! You created a thread called Not Enough Expeirence to CSD at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:SecurlyHub.png

Thanks for uploading File:SecurlyHub.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 04:07, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2019 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I don't know what I'm doing. Please stop, me! Give it a break. One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 20:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NumWorks has been accepted

NumWorks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

– The Grid (talk) 12:46, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of KDE Plasma Mobile for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KDE Plasma Mobile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KDE Plasma Mobile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Agaba Perez (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of KDE Plasma Mobile

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on KDE Plasma Mobile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheWin RatHere! 16:32, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nproc (Unix) (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not clear how this custom command is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nproc (Unix) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nproc (Unix), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing Draft Space

I see that you are evidently reviewing new pages in draft. First, thank you for taking an interest in new page review. However, second, I think that you are applying a stricter standard to what can be in draft space than is useful. There are only a few sorts of pages that need immediate attention in draft space, mainly attack pages or libel, or might reasonably be seen as such. There are a few other things that are completely inappropriate in draft space, but mostly draft space can be ignored except via the Articles for Creation review process. So please either review draft space, but with the knowledge that it should normally be left alone as harmless, and only rarely either speedy-tagged or nominated for deletion; or review article space, where we really do need to flag pages that will be seen by our readers. The two pages that you sent to MFD yesterday should both have been tagged for speedy deletion if they were in article space. The band would be A7, and the one in Arabic could have been tagged in various ways. Thank you for trying to help; in this case, it wasn't helping. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOOLS

Please read it before playing with jokes. No article space or help space edits where readers will see, and don’t make work for other editors to clean up. Acroterion (talk) 02:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Acroterion, To add onto this: It's not April Fools yet. I went out of my way to design a magic template that disappears into the shadow realm on April 1st, it's advice is good advice :P —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 03:55, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm Koridas. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2020 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Koridas (Speak) 17:54, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2020. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Koridas (Speak) 17:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please stop with this otherwise you're going to be blocked, Jokes stop being fun when they annoy others and plus the lyrics cannot remain due to being wp:copyright,
Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. STOP FUCKING EVERYTHING UP!!!!!!!!! One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 18:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carefully read WP:FOOLS

Never* use Twinkle for joke AfDs. Ever. Thank you. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 18:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joke noms

Will you please stop making fake nominations at MFD/AFD/RFD? It's tired and it's disruptive. Doing it once is barely funny, much less multiple times. Praxidicae (talk) 19:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let me put something into perspective for you, as Davey2010 also outlined below. You're quickly heading toward some sort of block or sanction. You have 417 live edits as of 2 minutes ago. You have 97 (undeleted) April Fool's day edits on April 1, 2020 and 114 (undeleted) April Fool's edits from April 1, 2019. That's 50% of your total undeleted edits over the lifetime of your account. Might I make an even stronger suggestion that you refrain from touching anything related to this day as a joke or otherwise, including RFCs. It's disruptive. Praxidicae (talk) 21:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I'll try to be more helpful in the future, and I apologize for anything I did. One Blue Hat ^{❯❯❯ (talk)} 21:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Create one more April Fools XFD (AFD, RFD, MFD) and I'll have you blocked for disruptive editing,
Your actions are now becoming disruptive and are beginning to piss off myself and other editors here,
Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 19:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2019/The Great April Fools' Day Edit War of 2019

Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2019/The Great April Fools' Day Edit War of 2019, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2019/The Great April Fools' Day Edit War of 2019 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2019/The Great April Fools' Day Edit War of 2019 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Most Horizontal Primate (talk) 23:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hat Kid from A Hat in Time.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hat Kid from A Hat in Time.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:47, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nproc (Unix)

Hello, One Blue Hat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nproc".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April Fools Day

Please do not use twinkle for April fools day jokes, particularly for AFDs. Please read April fools day rules. Twinkle will inproperly add an afd to the actual article, and it will place it in the Afd log for that day with regular deletion discussions instead of April Fools discussion. Also read the previous warnings from last year where people told you not to do that before. WikiVirusC^(talk) 19:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Trouted per my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cancel culture (2nd nomination) —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:48, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly reminder

Blue Hat, please make sure that you're placing joke deletion nominations in the proper section, tagging them correctly, and removing the "REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD" template so a deletion notice isn't added to the main article. I don't want to be a killjoy, but you need to make sure that your deletion nominations comply with WP:Rules for Fools. Otherwise, you're likely to attract the ire of someone who has far less of a sense of humor than I do. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 20:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]