User talk:OneCyclone

Archives

Norwegian Gem

I left a message for you on my talk page.--Kyle_(talk) 21:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian Jade

Slight problem is that you can't really see the livery on that photo.Geni 15:41, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that it's not as clear as the Pride of Hawaii photo, but it is the only Norwegian Jade photo that anyone has added to the article. Also, clicking on the photo once or twice does expand it and make the livery more visible. If you can find a usable photo that shows the ship and livery, by all means add it to that page. --OneCyclone (talk) 20:04, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afarid I don't have a better one since I was ~1mile away from the ship at the time.Geni 17:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfC/U

There is currently an open Request for Comment on User Conduct here, regarding G2bambino. As someone with past interactions with him, you are invited to comment. — [ roux ] [x] 15:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sol Meliá

You didn't finish the afd process. I fixed it for you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I never nominated an article before and was having trouble getting through the format. --OneCyclone (talk) 02:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:NeptunWerft.jpg)

You've uploaded File:NeptunWerft.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Big epic profile.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Big epic profile.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Frigidaire Logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Frigidaire Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NeptunWerft.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NeptunWerft.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rayukk (talk) 16:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:MV Marco Polo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MV Marco Polo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Star Cruises

A tag has been placed on Category:Star Cruises requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:21, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]