User talk:OleDe

This is OleDe's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manifesto on Principles of Modal Realism in Arts (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manifesto on Principles of Modal Realism in Arts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 15:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qcne, thanks for your feedback, I used GPT to partially translate the article from my native language it was written in and to check the grammar, and I accepted several suggestions. But the article itself was not written by GPT. Do you have any specific objections and comments that I need to address? Thank you! OleDe (talk) 19:00, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @OleDe, it has the typical structure and prose common in LLM output. It reads more like an essay than an encyclopaedia article. You should only be summarising in your own words what reliable published sources state about a topic, instead of presenting viewpoints and such. You also should reference in-line, so follow the tutorial at WP:INTREFVE. qcne (talk) 19:14, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Qcne, you are right is written as assay, if it’s not how it should be I’ll try to re-write it following the guidelines. Thanks! 109.207.199.134 (talk) 19:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(remember to log in when posting); my advice is to find some strong secondary sources first, then summarise what those sources state in a factual, neutral, way. qcne (talk) 19:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OleDe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 15:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]