User talk:Ohaider
Welcome!
Hello, Ohaider, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Ragib 21:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Please join the Bengali language wikipedia as well (see http://bn.wiki.x.io ) --Ragib 21:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Mr. Haider, I maintain an alumni site for CSE BUET graduates. Which batch are you from? I can add your info there. Thanks. --Ragib 19:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ragib. My name is there(HSC 87). I guess Joy did it for me. BTW BUET itself has started its own section on Alumni http://www.buet.ac.bd/alumni/. However the session thing is strange. For me its 90-91. Thanks. -- Ohaider
Alamgir Kabir (filmmaker)
[edit]--howcheng {chat} 16:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
If you ask me I think the fact that he interviewed Castro would have been more interesting. Because commies getting arrested is not uncommon. Omar 14:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Revert of Bangladesh Liberation War
[edit]Why did you revert 19 revisions from Bangladesh Liberation War claiming vandalism? I have looked through the edits and do not see any that are WP:vandalism. In fact you reverted many constructive additions to the page. I personally, spent a reasonable amount of time rewording the lede. Please consider reading WP:Vandalism and WP:Assume good faith. If you disagree with some of the edits feel free to make your own constructive edits, but calling other people's constructive work vandalism is not appropriate and neither is mas reverting of constructive edits. Cheers, — sligocki (talk) 17:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Laksam Upazila
[edit]An article in a subject area that you have been involved in editing, Laksam Upazila , has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 08:23, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Ananda Group for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ananda Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ananda Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arr4 (talk) 16:49, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Ways to improve Blockade (2016 film)
[edit]Hello, Ohaider,
Thanks for creating Blockade (2016 film)! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
A large section of the text you have added has been cut and past from soas.ac.uk/south-asia-institute/events/21nov2018-blockade.html which is in violation of copyright. You must use your own words when creating articles or adding text
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 09:36, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Hughesdarren,
Thanks for your feedback. My bad, I had someone summarize it for me. Didn't realize it was copied like that. I will be careful and rely on my own going forward.