Jump to content

User talk:OhHaiMark/Archives/2024/September

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome!

Hello, Testeraccount101!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, paul2520 💬 18:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Yun-yeung has been accepted

Tropical Storm Yun-yeung, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ratnahastin (talk) 05:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tropical Storm Yun-yeung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aon. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Yun-yeung

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tropical Storm Yun-yeung you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 22:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Sorry to let you know, but I had to fail the GAN for Tropical Storm Yun-yeung. The article is on the short side, and there were some basic problems that prevented me from passing it as a good article, namely the lack of local sources, and enough forms of impact justifying the notability for the storm. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 06:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Mr. Zumakpeh’s Biography

The section I have added to Mr. Zumakpeh’s biography is accurate and sourced. Why do you keep reverting it? Josiah Nterful (talk) 03:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Some of these sources have dubious quality. Additionally, as his assistant, you hae a conflict of interest and should refrain from editing the article. OhHaiMark (talk) 10:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Let me reiterate that I am not his assistant and do not have a conflict of interest-nothing in the section I have added suggest that. My intension is simply to contribute to provide Wikipedia with accurate information about Mr. Zumakpeh; the initial information is not entirely true.
Again, every information I have put forth is true, and the sources (neutral sites) give a definitive explanation of same. The initial sources are not extraordinary.
People trust Wikipedia for reliable information, so it is imperative to furnish the site with accurate data. I think that should be our concern. Josiah Nterful (talk) 19:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

How do you create an article?

We joined around the same time, but I don’t know how to create an article. Can you tell me? LordKaiju4432 (talk) 02:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

@LordKaiju4432: You can create an article using the article wizard. It will guide you through the process. C F A 💬 17:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Your page move request

Please be aware that names of Wikipedia articles about places in the United States are governed by WP:USPLACE, which states that such names are typically in the form of "Place name, State name". The only exceptions currently allowed under that guideline are major cities for which the AP Stylebook specifically states that state names are not needed. Fort Myers, Florida, is not on that list of exceptions, and your move request was not non-controversial. Any exceptions to the USPLACE naming convention other than one using the AP Stylebook must receive consensus for the exception as the result of a sufficiently wide discussion. Donald Albury 20:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

1980 Pacific typhoon season

Hey there, you don't need to have your own draft space for that season. You're allowed, and in fact, encouraged to edit and expand the article! I would suggest that any non-named storms should go into one big "Other systems" section, which could include any JMA/JTWC/PAGASA/other depressions. It's going to be time consuming, but working on a season article is a very useful undertaking! I would consider the ultimate goal of the WPTC is to get every season article in every basin to good/featured article status. It'll take a while, one article at a time, so if you did this one, that would only be one of only 16 good typhoon season articles. Further, you could get the 1980 PTS to good topic status, since all of the storm articles that season are already GA's. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

So Dom wouldn't be listed only as a typhoon, because it's actually stronger than that, hence why the infobox lists "Very strong typhoon (JMA)". Does that make sense? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Well, the thing is that, turns out the JTWC actually held responsibility in the basin at that time, meaning I was trying to swap the template, which works by assuming that the JMA holds responsibility for the basin. However, if you see the edit which I just saved, it doesn't show the JMA modifier.[1] OhHaiMark (talk) 17:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
So I don't think you should be swapping the template. The JMA is now the official RSMC, and has been for a while, so their database is the official historic record, as far back as it goes. You can and should include the JTWC winds in the infobox, but that is an American military department, and shouldn't be seen as some official weather agency. The English Wikipedia is not the American Wikipedia. It's important to cover international events as neutral as possible, which means deferring to the RSMC more often than not. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:35, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

The biggest thing you need to do is rewrite the article so it's not all focused on the JTWC. For example, Carmen's section starts with the JTWC monitoring it as a depression, but honestly it works just as well saying that Carmen originated within a near-equatorial trough, along with Wally in the SPAC. Make sure you don't use knots in the article. It should be km/h with mph in parenthesis. Make sure all of the storms have track maps, like the current 1980 PTS article. The biggest thing in the article is giving impact sections to each storm, especially the ones without an article. Like Dom, it's a good start mentioning the number of damaged houses, but it needs more. You might need to use the newspaper archive so you can get news stories, as some impact information might not be available online. Do you know how to use your Wikipedia user name to get free access to newspaper archives? Check out Wikipedia:Newspapers.com. Lastly, the other storms section shouldn't be in bullet points, it should be listed as individual paragraphs. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

My account isn't six months old yet so I can't access it yet. OhHaiMark (talk) 09:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Also, I only included the bullet points as those were present in all modern articles on typhoon seasons. OhHaiMark (talk) 09:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
OK, you should still be able to find information online from various databases. Digital Typhoon often has info on Japanese storms. Make sure you add track maps back in, I'm not sure why they're missing. Do you know how to use Google to find info? For example, I googled ["Typhoon Ditang" 1980] and found some good info for the storm, like this source. Try varieties like that. Hope that helps. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
  1. ^ It does Very Strong Typhoon instead of Very Strong Typhoon (JMA).

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Yun-yeung

The article Tropical Storm Yun-yeung you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Tropical Storm Yun-yeung for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 06:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

What happened?

Hello, I noticed that you reverted my edit. I am an old school editor and back in my day we had the latest info for a hurricane. I mean if someone went to an article to find the latest info, they would be discouraged and go to the NHC for the latest information. Sorry if it is like "Old editor yells at cloud" thing, but that is what I am used to. Felicia (talk) 13:45, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, due to an ANI thread, village dump thread, and this, it's now discouraged. Additionally, the former templates have also been deleted as they were a violation of WP:NOTNEWS and MOS:CURRENT. OhHaiMark (talk) 13:52, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
I'll keep that in note. It will take me some adjusting. I won't make another mistake now that I know. Felicia (talk) 14:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

2005 Atlantic hurricane season

Hey there OhHaiMark. I was glad to see that you might be interested in working on the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season topic. You did a good job working on Yun-yeung, so I wondered if you might be interested working on Tropical Storm Tammy (2005)? I proposed merging a flood article in with Tammy, so there's a bit of work that needs to get done there. Otherwise, what did you have in mind? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

OhHaiMark again, just wanted to check about the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season topic. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:13, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Oh, right! I nearly forgot about that. As I'm currently working on some projects, I wasn't able to focus on it with my full attention. OhHaiMark (talk) 03:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

"Weather of 1980" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Weather of 1980 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 16 § Weather of 1980 until a consensus is reached. Blethering Scot 15:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

PD-NWS Violations Update #1

I am providing members of the WikiProject of Weather along with users who frequently edit weather-related articles an update to the discussions regarding the PD-NWS image copyright template.

For starters, no "formal" administrative-style rules have occurred. All that means is the template is not formally deprecated and is still in use. However, Rlandmann, an administrator on English Wikipedia, has begun an undertaking of reviewing and assessing all images (~1,400) that use the PD-NWS copyright template.

What we know:

  • Following email communications, the National Weather Service of Sioux Falls has removed their disclaimer, which has been used for the PD-NWS template for decades. This means, as far as the National Weather Service is concerned, the following statement is no longer valid: By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain. This means that your photo or video may be downloaded, copied, and used by others. Currently, the PD-NWS template links to an archived version of the disclaimer. However, the live version of the disclaimer no longer contains that phrase.
  • See this deletion discussion for this point's information. NWS Paducah (1) failed to give attribution to a photographer of a tornado photograph, (2) placed the photo into the public domain without the photographer explicitly giving them permission to do so (i.e. the photo is not actually in the public domain), (3) and told users to acknowledge NWS as the source for information on the webpage. Oh, to note, this photographer is a magistrate (i.e. a judge). So, the idea of automatically trusting images without clear attribution on weather.gov are free-to-use is in question.
  • The Wikimedia Commons has a process known as precautionary principle, where if their is significant doubt that an image is free-to-use, it will be deleted. Note, one PD-NWS file has been deleted under the precautionary principle. The closing administrator remarks for the deletion discussion were: "Per the precautionary principle, there is "significant doubt" about the public domain status of this file (4x keep + nominator, 5x delete), so I will delete it."
  • Several photographs/images using the PD-NWS are currently mid-deletion discussion, all for various reasonings.
  • As of this message, 250 PD-NWS images have been checked out of the ~1,400.
  • The photograph of the 1974 Xenia tornado (File:Xenia tornado.jpg) was found to not be in the public domain. It is still free-to-use, but under a CC 2.0 license, which requires attribution. From April 2009 to August 2024, Wikipedia/Wikimedia was incorrectly (and by definition, illegally) using the photograph, as it was marked incorrectly as a public domain photograph.

Solutions:
As stated earlier, there is no "formal" rulings, so no "formal" changes have been made. However, there is a general consensus between editors on things which are safe to do:

  • Images made directly by NWS employees can be uploaded and used under the new PD-USGov-NWS-employee template (Usage: {{PD-USGov-NWS-employee}} ). This is what a large number of PD-NWS templated images are being switched to.
  • Images from the NOAA Damage Assessment Toolkit (DAT) can be uploaded and used under the PD-DAT template (Usage: {{PD-DAT}} ). A large number of images are also being switched to this template.

For now, you are still welcome to upload images under the PD-NWS template. However, if possible it is recommended using the two templates above. I will send out another update when new information is found or new "rulings" have been made. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tropical Storm Ruth (1980) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tropical Storm Ruth (1980). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Hone references

Btw the National Hurricane Center is not the publisher for Hone's advisories. For future reference, it would be the Central Pacific Hurricane Center located in Honolulu, Hawaii (RSMC Honolulu). Noah, BSBATalk 20:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Axel (1992)

Hey there, I saw that you had a draft for the storm that you wanted to published. I noticed you adding links to the article before it got published (on the equatorial tropical cyclones list). Just to let you know. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ibjaja055 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, OhHaiMark! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ibjaja055 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Thank you so much for keeping the tropical cyclone track maps updated at Wikimedia Commons! The team working on that is very small, so it is a pleasure to have you here and you are vital to the project's future! From a fellow track map maker, good luck and keep up the good work! 2003 LN6 23:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the award! OhHaiMark (talk) 02:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Storm data and other unusual weather phenomena

Hi there, regarding this edit, I wanted to make sure you knew the proper source, for the future. That kind of information can be found in the National Climatic Data Center Storm events database - here - just enter the state and the time period, and you can get the individual reports. That way you can get a good working link, rather than relying on deadlinks from old Wikipedia articles (which might be in need of updating). ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Ahh. Thanks for the info! OhHaiMark (talk) 17:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Re: Draft:Good Boy (TV series)

I didn't notice you that already marked the page as "under review", when I edited the synopsis section, I apologize for that. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Update: you may now publish the article I made into the main page. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 18:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Typhoon Chuck has been accepted

Typhoon Chuck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 01:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Fan POV Maintenance Box

Hiya, I noticed you added the Fan POV Maintenance Box to the article Uniforms and Insignia of the Red Army (1917-1922) and was just wandering if you could maybe give some pointers on what I might change to be able to remove it? Thanks! ^^ Rojo Rosa (talk) 08:24, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Axel (1992)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tropical Storm Axel (1992) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 09:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Axel (1992)

The article Tropical Storm Axel (1992) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tropical Storm Axel (1992) and Talk:Tropical Storm Axel (1992)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 10:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

So, as for A Mouse called Junction...

...why is the "called" in the title lowercased? Is there something at MOS:TITLE I didn't catch up on yet, or it is otherwise unwritten?

By the way, though, thanks for the AFC approval! --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 13:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

review

hi sir @OhHaiMark can you review my page please [[1]] Tahanido (talk) 16:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

@OhHaiMark Tahanido (talk) 11:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Ramesh Auti page creation

hi sir i read your message. you say If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. but i given 8 References. and you just open that websites, also check Ramesh Auti name maintion in film poster. for editor in hindi language. also in marathi language like रमेश औटी. please deeply check this name. all correct References i given. Wp.ramesh wiki (talk) 20:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1720s in English cricket

A tag has been placed on Category:1720s in English cricket indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 13:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Draft

Hi there! I noticed that you had begun reviewing Draft:Austin J. Tobin Plaza, and in the process requested speedy deletion of Austin J. Tobin Plaza, which has now been carried out by an admin. Thanks! :) Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 21:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

PD-NWS Violations Update #2 (Key To Read Third Section)

I am providing members of the WikiProject of Weather along with users who frequently edit weather-related articles an new update (2nd update) to the discussions regarding the PD-NWS image copyright template.

On the Commons, an RFC discussion is taking place to figure out how to manage the template. No "formal" administrative-style rules have occurred, so nothing has changed. That is not a surprise as the RFC is still ongoing.

What is new?

  • The entire Template:PD-NWS has been placed inside a "License Review" template, which is viewable via the link aforementioned.
  • Most of the photographs which were uploaded to the Commons originally under the PD-NWS template (approximately 1,500) have been reviewed. Out of those ~1,500 images, only about 150 are requiring additional looks. Most images have been verified as free-to-use and switched to a respective, valid template.
  • As of this moment, approximately 50 photos have been nominated for deletion (results pending).
  • A handful of images have been deleted (either confirmed copyrighted or under the Commons precautionary principle.
  • One image has been kept following a deletion request under the PD-NWS template.

How to deal with new photos?

Given all of this, you might be wondering how the heck you use weather photos while creating articles? Well, here is what you can do!

What about third-party photos?

In the case of third-party photos...i.e. ones not taken by the National Weather Service themselves...there is an option which was discussed and confirmed to be valid from an English Wikipedia Administrator.

  • KEY: Third party images of tornadoes & weather-related content can potentially be uploaded via Wikipedia's Non-Free Content Guidelines!
  • Experiments/testing has been done already! In fact, I bet you couldn't tell the difference, but the tornado photograph used at the top of the 2011 Joplin tornado was already switched to a Non-Free File (NFF)! Check it out: File:Photograph of the 2011 Joplin tornado.jpeg! That photo's description can also be used as a template for future third-party tornado photographs uploaded to Wikipedia...with their respective information replaced.
  • NFFs can be uploaded to multiple articles as well!
  • The absolute key aspect of NFFs is that they relate to the article and are not decoration. For example with the Joplin tornado, the photograph: (1) shows the size of the tornado, (2) shows the "wall of darkness", which was described by witnesses, (3) shows a historic, non-repeatable event of the deadliest tornado in modern U.S. history. The exact reasoning does not have to be extremely specific as Wikipedia's NFF guidelines "is one of the most generous in the world" (words of Rlandmann (not pinged), the administrator reviewing all the PD-NWS template images).
  • Tornado photographs will almost certainly qualify under the NFF guidelines, especially for tornadoes with standalone articles or standalone sections.
  • NFFs cannot be used when a free-photograph is available, no matter the quality, unless the section is about that specific photograph. For example, the photograph used at the top of the 2013 Moore tornado article is confirmed to be free-to-use, therefore, no NFFs of that tornado can be uploaded on Wikipedia. However, the "Dead Man Walking" photograph could almost certainly be uploaded as an NFF to the 1997 Jarrell tornado article as that photograph is the topic of a section in the article.
  • NFFs currently on Wikipedia can and should be placed in this category: Category:Non-free pictures of tornadoes.

Update Closing

Hopefully all of that information kept you informed on the Commons copyright discussion process and how you can still create the best articles possible! If you have a question about something mentioned above, reply back and I will do my best to answer it! Also, ping me in the process to ensure I see it! Have a good day! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 01:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Axel (1992)

The article Tropical Storm Axel (1992) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tropical Storm Axel (1992) for comments about the article, and Talk:Tropical Storm Axel (1992)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 02:04, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! OhHaiMark (talk) 11:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Style change carried out (again) following your feedback.

Hi @OhHaiMark, thanks for your feedback on this draft: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:Belarusian_Sport_Solidarity_Foundation

I re-styled it again to make it as neutral as possible. There is no more peacock phrasing, and all links are there. I re-submitted the article. Hopefully, it'll be approved and published. Artrage (talk) 10:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OhHaiMark/Archives/2024/September&oldid=1245294088"