User talk:Observer&Pedagogue

I again removed what appeared to be a facetious reversion to an item originally inserted by the person who did this reversion. The individual referenced has no claim to being a noteworthy alumnus. Observer&Pedagogue (talk) 01:00, 19 March 2012 (UTC) I reverted to my previous edit, undoing changes by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. I don't know what his real reason was to remove material, his stated reason (trivial) being entirely subjective.[reply]

Verulam School

Hi Observer&Pedagogue - you reverted my edits to Verulam School, and I'm not sure why? My note against the edit was "alphabetised list [of alumni], renamed section, copyedit, removed apparently non-notable people, added internal links". It seems a shame to lose the internal links and alphabetisation, and my understanding is that alumni should not usually be listed if they do not have a Wikipedia article of their own, as they are then considered not notable. Thanks, Tacyarg (talk) 18:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted to my earlier version, in effect undoing frivolous changes. Observer&Pedagogue (talk) 14:34, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]