User talk:OMEGAUNIT

November 2016

Hello, I'm Imminent77. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2016 Portland, Oregon riots, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Imminent77 (talk) 18:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2016 Portland, Oregon riots. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Parsley Man (talk) 21:07, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Parsley Man (talk) 03:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC) Parsley Man (talk) 03:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2016 Portland, Oregon riots, you may be blocked from editing. Kleuske (talk) 17:05, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sophie Theallet have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 22:43, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George Soros. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. zzz (talk) 23:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Sakuura Cartelet ^Talk 00:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion has been speedy closed by a non-admin with no action being taken against you. Sakuura Cartelet ^Talk 00:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hogg

He was home at the time of the shooting that was a misunderstanding. What actually happened was that he said after the shooting he went home and then came back to interview people. Please note that our policy 11 people applies to talk pages and repeating lies about someone like this is against our policy even on a talk page. Doug Weller talk 21:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lies?

That is what Hogg stated that isn't a lie. What you are doing is a lie, you are lying. OMEGAUNIT (talk) 12:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's not accurate. Read this. Doug Weller talk 13:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, OMEGAUNIT. You have new messages at Ian.thomson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fringe content not supported by any reliable sources

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Articles on Wikipedia do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation in proportion to their prominence. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:21, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]