User talk:Not0nshoree

This is Not0nshoree's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kane Pixels (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't quite pass WP:NBASIC yet. If accepted, the existing redirect at Kane_Pixels&redirect=no will need removing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kane Pixels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Not0nshoree! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kane Pixels (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

After checking all the sources, I believe that "The Backrooms" series may be the notable thing here and that already has a page of sorts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kane Pixels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kane Pixels (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm inclined to agree with the last reviewer, right now all the notability seems to come from The Backrooms. The Streamy Award helps but doesn't exactly meet notability. It might be WP:TOOSOON until either the film or another of his works gets more notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kane Pixels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 02:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chen Wenzhong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sprinter. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note for anyone who saw the previous attempt at AfD on The Backrooms (upcoming film)

I misunderstood the code for the AfD and did not make it so a discussion page was open. I do not think it screwed anything up, but if it did, please let me know so I can better learn what to do in the future. Not0nshoree (talk) 19:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Not0nshoree,

Feel free to "withdraw" your nomination but please let an uninvolved editor close the AFD discussion and carry out the closing decision. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I thought I was doing the right thing there, but I wasn’t, thank you for correcting me. Not0nshoree (talk) 02:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Backrooms

Thank you for your contributions to Backrooms (web series). All your work is greatly appreciated. I was wondering if it’s possible to upload an image of series title card to the info box. I ask because I am worried a future editor might try to move the page to “The Backrooms (web series)”. Some people think it should be that title because the first video of the series has “The” in the title. I go based on the videos opening credits. The other videos also only say “Backrooms” in their titles. It also doesn’t help that Kane made a playlist titled “The Backrooms”. I feel with an image in the info box , people will be less likely to change the title. If you can help with this it will be greatly appreciated. Thanks Key limes (talk) 16:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! There is a frame from Found Footage on Commons (File:A short film by Kane Parsons.jpg). While it is not the frame we are looking for, it may be an indicator that we can upload a screencap of the title card frame. (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 16:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Resonance (HOME song) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Resonance (HOME song). Thanks! She was ^afairy 00:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Resonance (HOME song) (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shewasafairy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Resonance (HOME song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

She was ^afairy 00:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Backrooms draft

I found a new draft for the Backrooms that you might be interested in. Draft:The Backrooms (Found Footage). Needs a lot of work. Key limes (talk) 17:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, not sure if the video itself is worthy of a standalone article, however, I may see if I can do anything to improve it. (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 22:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gibberish?

I've removed your {{db-nonsense}} tag at Draft:Backrooms: A Custom View. The draft is not incomprehensible gibberish. It is clearly describing a 4Chan image that falls into the category of liminal spaces. Is it worthy of being published as a Wikipedia article? No. But is it incomprehensible gibberish? Also no. :kd;jdee ekj ;d ;lk aj;a ;a dcfdad;;ilj is incomprehensible gibberish. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Backrooms (web series)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Backrooms (web series) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vortex3427 -- Vortex3427 (talk) 09:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Backrooms (web series)

The article Backrooms (web series) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Backrooms (web series) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vortex3427 -- Vortex3427 (talk) 03:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Not0nshoree: Are you planning to work on this article further? — VORTEX³⁴²⁷ (Talk!) 06:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 14:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valley View Center (The Oldest View)

Found source for The Valley View center article, that mentions the oldest view as well as the mall itself. https://archive.is/WeR56 Key limes (talk) 02:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Medium is considered a self published source so may not be good for inclusion. I wish there were better sources on this topic because I know there can be, seems like every source is conveniently considered unreliable by editors lol (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 12:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. tgeorgescu (talk) 00:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

👍 (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 00:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on the CIA talk page

Was the controversies section ever expanded as you wanted? I added this to the article today:

John Kiriakou and the CIA removing Abu Zubaydah's left eye

Integrated into the article:

John Kiriakou is a former CIA counterterrorism officer who was the only CIA officer sentenced in the CIA's enhanced interrogation program. Kiriakou was sentenced to 2 years prison for exposing the CIA's enhanced interrogation program. While in CIA custody, Zubaydah previously damaged left eye was surgically removed.^[1]^[2]

Ironcurtain2 (talk) 17:08, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was, I noticed the expansion the day before yesterday I think lol. I was wanting to do it myself however I kinda gave up and that’s when I wrote the message on the talk page. (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 19:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Backrooms missing episode

Article is missing unlisted video “faultline.mov” originally titled “collateral.mov”. Video was originally in description of “First Contact”. Video is still on Kane’s channel but is unlisted. Tried to post link here, but was unable to. Key limes (talk) 00:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot that video existed for a minute, I will add that. There is also an unlisted video under "Backrooms - Presentation" simply titled "Simpsons". However, I am highly skeptical of including that video, as it is from a separate channel and thus labeling it as an episode/installment could count as original research due to its ambiguous nature.

Also, as a side note: if you are unable to send YouTube links, check to make sure you are not using a shorted URL. So, that means if your URL begins in youtu.be, you could try opening the video in a web browser such as Chrome, and typically they will use the youtube.com version, hopefully fixing the issue. (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 02:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Snowfall (song)

Hello, Not0nshoree. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Snowfall (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Snowfall (song)

Hello, Not0nshoree. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Snowfall".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:7thC-document-stub has been nominated for deletion

Template:7thC-document-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the stub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the template's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 01:17, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging other people's drafts

Please do not tag other people's drafts with the AfC template, as you did here.[1] It is up to them whether they use AfC or not. – Joe (talk) 10:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:InspiringPhilosophy

Hello, Not0nshoree. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:InspiringPhilosophy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:InspiringPhilosophy

Hello, Not0nshoree. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "InspiringPhilosophy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ Matthews, Dylan (9 December 2014). "16 absolutely outrageous abuses detailed in the CIA torture report". Vox.com. Retrieved March 9, 2023.
^ "The Al Qaeda Capture That Went Horribly Wrong John Kiriakou". Danny Jones Clips. Retrieved 2 June 2024.

[1] Matthews, Dylan (9 December 2014). "16 absolutely outrageous abuses detailed in the CIA torture report". Vox.com. Retrieved March 9, 2023.

[2] "The Al Qaeda Capture That Went Horribly Wrong John Kiriakou". Danny Jones Clips. Retrieved 2 June 2024.

[1]

[2]