User talk:Ninthelevedaradades4243222

Sandbox

Do not put offensive content in the sandbox. Cullen328 (talk) 23:38, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why not Ninthelevedaradades4243222 (talk) 23:38, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because you will be blocked if you continue. Read the instructions on the page. Fake articles are also unacceptable. Cullen328 (talk) 23:40, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I promise not to add offensive content again. Ninthelevedaradades4243222 (talk) 23:42, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you only allowed to keep the sandbox Family-Friendly Ninthelevedaradades4243222 (talk) 23:47, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ninthelevedaradades4243222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Cullen328 can you please unblock me, I stopped vandalizing

Decline reason:

This is not relevant to your block. Yamla (talk) 00:06, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But i was not a Sockpuppet account Ninthelevedaradades4243222 (talk) 00:17, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a proper unblock request. Cullen328 (talk) 01:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is a proper unblock request Ninthelevedaradades4243222 (talk) 01:58, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to carefully follow the instructions in the block notice above. Cullen328 (talk) 05:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ninthelevedaradades4243222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize and will admit that the two IP adressess on the article that i vandalized article were mine and caused two additional votes, rather than reason thar it shouldn't result in an indefinite ban from Wikipedia I will first apologize for denying it, I apologize for doing it, I can definitely say I will not be doing this again which is true regardless of currently not

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:06, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ninthelevedaradades4243222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise not to be a sockpuppet anymore

Decline reason:

That does not make sense - if you are a sockpuppet account, you remain one, despite whatever you promise. PhilKnight (talk) 19:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm revoking talk page access due to repeated requests that fall well under the WP:GAB bar. The standard offer is available and should be made via the original blocked account.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]