User talk:NeuroSpecter

Welcome!

Hello, Moderator no. 22349, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 19:34, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Moderator no. 22349", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because while we don't formally have a position called "moderator", your name could still mislead other users into thinking you have specific permissions. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 18:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trueeee, okay I have applied for a name change. They should do like an automatic flagging for such things. I thought it was a funny name but I can see how it can be problematic. Thanks! Moderator no. 22349 (talk) 19:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Also, good idea, I wonder if setting up an edit filter for this has been considered. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After looking, it is indeed in the list of words meant to be automatically flagged at Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention, but somehow you got lucky and didn't trigger it. Really thinking it could be good to alert the users in the non-obvious cases like this one (where the username policy is technically broken, but it might just be someone wanting a funny username rather than clear vandalism). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, thanks! Moderator no. 22349 (talk) 22:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Please do not remove information from articles. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. _ZZ^Z 'S 04:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does have bad images policies and certain images need to be removed. Please do your job, see here: MediaWiki:Bad image list NeuroSpecter (talk) 14:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Ejaculation. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. If you want to make a case based on facts and circumstances for a particular image, then focus your comments on the specifics of the image and Wikipedia policy. However, Wikipedia is not censored, and broad labeling of other users is unacceptable. —C.Fred (talk) 13:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is posting hardcore porn videos and pictures okay? That doesn’t make any sense. You guys need to be tough on those perverts not me. NeuroSpecter (talk) 14:07, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have to abide by our WP:RULES. We don't have to abide by your rules/morality. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:20, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you’re clearly in the wrong. Well I did my part. MediaWiki:Bad image list NeuroSpecter (talk) 14:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't obey our WP:RULES, you will be booted out of this website. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:31, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How are some images allowed and some aren’t? The rules say Wikipedia is uncensored but we obviously don’t allowed CP or bestiality stuff. The Bondage page appears to have unnecessarily high number of super graphic grotesque pornographic images of people I don’t think who are aware of that they’re on Wikipedia. How is this okay? Can you please explain? I am uttering shocked by the thought that innocent kids can run into these as there is no warning system. Could you please help me understand this? Also the graphic nature of the pictures and videos in the ejaculation page, while the MediaWiki:Bad image list page clearly shows example and such content shouldn’t be allowed. It got an emotional response from me as I don’t think any parent would want their kids to randomly come across such graphic content without warning. You do see where I am coming from right? NeuroSpecter (talk) 14:48, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki:Bad image list shows no such thing. It is a place wherein people make gentle demands, and admins analyze the merit of such demands. The people who make such demands are in no position to impose their own will upon the Wikipedia Community. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a mod? I saw several comments about the questionable images in the Bondage (BDSM) page so it isn’t just me. Could you please go through the page and remove the necessary questionable images that don’t add anything to the page but just excuses the page as an excuse to post lewd pictures? Everyone would be really thankful 🙏 NeuroSpecter (talk) 18:34, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: *unnecessary NeuroSpecter (talk) 18:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear: please avoid using terms like "perverts" to describe other editors. If the images should be removed, you can make a valid case without resorting to ad hominem attacks against other editors. —C.Fred (talk) 20:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! Those grotesque images just drove me mad and I let my emotions take over. I’ll all better now 🙏 NeuroSpecter (talk) 20:19, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m NeuroSpecter (talk) 20:19, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For Wikipedia there is no good way or performing moral or political censorship. Censorship is thus a threat to the existence of Wikipedia. That's why experienced Wikipedians are so vehement about not censoring Wikipedia. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]