User talk:Nattes à chat
Welcome!
|
Invitation to Women in Red's current edit-a-thon
[edit]You are invited... | |
---|---|
Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Women in photography
[edit]You are invited... | |
---|---|
Women in Photography
|
--Ipigott (talk) 13:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs
[edit]Thank you for your recent articles, including Rosette Wolczak, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Regarding Template:Did you know nominations/Rosette Wolczak, you need to add the hook - finish the "that..." sentence. Take a look at other noms at T:TDYK page. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Orphan is applicable because there are no articles linking to it, only internal wikipedia pages like the DYK nom our our talk pages. See [1]. In other words, you should add mentions of (in form of blue links) of RW to some other pages which would be relevant. Regarding the DYK nom, you should blue link and bold RW name (again, look at other noms on that page). Glad you are joining our English community, I think there are many French-language topics that we need to translate to the English-speaking word (I am not a native speaker of English myself, and I do a lot of translations from Polish Wikipedia, too). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:00, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Nice article I saw at #wikiwomeninred. "DYK" has a rule about one "ref" to every paragraph (at least) ... can you add these please? Thanks Victuallers (talk) 08
- 56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Victuallers, I'm really pleased to learn that you saw it from WIR. For the references, I will do my best! User:Rosiestep could you help (or somebody from your team?) --Nattes à chat (talk) 09:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi @Nattes à chat:. I looked at the article and really liked it! Thank you for writing it. --Rosiestep (talk) 01:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Victuallers, I'm really pleased to learn that you saw it from WIR. For the references, I will do my best! User:Rosiestep could you help (or somebody from your team?) --Nattes à chat (talk) 09:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Rosette Wolczak
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Rosette Wolczak at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Rosette Wolczak
[edit]On 3 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rosette Wolczak, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that because she was arrested for indecent behavior, Rosette Wolczak died in Auschwitz aged 15? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rosette Wolczak. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rosette Wolczak), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Precious
[edit]Swiss women
Thank you for quality translations from French of biographies of women who lived in Switzerland, such as Rosette Wolczak and Corinne Chaponnière, supporting project Women in Red, for adding precision, - imagining you "cycling to work with a crazy brightly colored Nutcase helmet": you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Dear Gerda Arendt , this is my first token ever on Wikipedia and I am very touched by the attention! Thank you very much, It will encourage me to keep going! --Nattes à chat (talk) 08:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, encouragement is one of my topics (not my article, but I worded the DYK for it) ;) - I took the prize over from others who started it years before I even joined. Rosette is featured also on Portal:Germany, where I collect all DYK related to Germany. - Happy collaborations! You met Rosiestep already, - SusunW also works miracles for women, their coverage and rights, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you Gerda Arendt. I so appreciate your continued support and encouragement. Glad to make your acquaintance Nattes à chat. I am out of pocket in June, traveling on the opposite side of the pond from my usual haunts, but will be back to it in July. If I can ever help, please let me know. I don't always have answers, but often know those who do have answers. SusunW (talk) 21:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Rosette made it to the Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, encouragement is one of my topics (not my article, but I worded the DYK for it) ;) - I took the prize over from others who started it years before I even joined. Rosette is featured also on Portal:Germany, where I collect all DYK related to Germany. - Happy collaborations! You met Rosiestep already, - SusunW also works miracles for women, their coverage and rights, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Four years ago, you were recipient no. 1399 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Wikimania 2016 is almost here! Mjohnson (WMF) and I are running two workshops for IdeaLab during the conference, and you are invited to join us for either (or both!)
If you have a proposal or idea you are thinking about, and would like a space to work on it on your own or with others, please consider joining us for either the Thursday or Saturday sessions. We'll discuss a little about IdeaLab and how it works, and the rest of the time is space for idea building. You can also use this session to ask questions about Wikimedia Foundation grants that are available if your proposal or idea may need funding. Thanks, and see you at the conference! I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 20:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Dear I JethroBT (WMF) well maybe I will use the opportunity to draft the grant I have to write to continue the project next year! Our last workshop will be on the 28th of june, so were are still very busy indeed... I will be happy to meet you. I have met your colleagues Katy Love and Winifried last week during their chapter visit. Cheers, --Nattes à chat (talk) 18:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Kenyan Community Currencies
[edit]For the programs in Kenya lots of articles can be found on this page: http://grassrootseconomics.org/media#news - you can also search google for more articles going all the way back to Eco-Pesa. Ng'ombeni-Pesa, Lindi-Pesa, Kangemi-Pesa, Gatina-Pesa and Balngla-Pesa all fall under what we call the Sarafu-Credit (a generic term for the type of Community Currencies here in Kenya). It would be great for some of this information to be out in the public and also in French! Thanks! Asante! Merci! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.139.225.218 (talk) 07:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia email re NewspaperArchive signup
[edit]It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
HazelAB (talk) 13:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Nattes à chat! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 07:52, Wednesday, September 14, 2016 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Disambiguation link notification for October 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Kramer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ENO. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
French
[edit]Hi, you can publicize it on French wikipedia if you wish, but you'll have to be very careful with the sourcing, no unsourced statements or poorly formatted sources! |Entries in French are very welcome too! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:53, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Do you mean that the french wiki is more strict with poorly formatted sources? another question : is it ok to translate? Thanks for your answers! --Nattes à chat (talk) 10:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Nattes à chat! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 18:59, Friday, October 14, 2016 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Nattes à chat! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 08:18, Saturday, October 15, 2016 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Nattes à chat! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 20:16, Monday, October 24, 2016 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Nattes à chat! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 04:52, Tuesday, November 1, 2016 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Another section
[edit]blablabalbalablabal --Nattes à chat (talk) 15:17, 1 November 2016 (UTC) Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by My5525 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
wiki - always learning by doing
[edit]Dear Nattes à chat
I am just practising the different ways to contact you in the english version of Wikipedia. Best
--Otarie69 (talk) 08:59, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Nattes à chat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Nattes à chat! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 09:26, Tuesday, December 20, 2016 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Question from tractor2014
[edit]What motivated you to become a contributor?--Tractor2014 (talk) 10:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- I read the NYT articles on the gender gap and decided to create an account as I was an active user but never thought about actively contribut
ing before reading the article. What about you?--Nattes à chat (talk) 11:42, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Nattes à chat
[edit](Charles R. Knight, 1922)
|
Thank you for all you did for this project in 2016, Nattes à chat. May your house be safe, and may you and those having the privilege of your company enjoy good health in a Happy New Year 2017! Kind regards, — Sam Sailor 01:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Pass on! Send this greeting by adding
{{subst:User:Sam Sailor/Templates/HappyNewYear}} to user talk pages. |
We're on Twitter!
[edit]Wiki Loves Pride is a global campaign to expand and improve LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. The activities of Wiki Loves Pride are focused on June and October, traditionally the months when lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) communities around the world celebrate LGBT culture and history. We invite you to participate in a series of edit-a-thons and other activities to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of LGBT-related content. First-time edit-a-thon organizers may find this page helpful.
WikiLGBT is on Twitter! | |
---|---|
|
RachelWex 14:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Nattes à chat (talk)! Glad to know that you also are on Twitter with Les sans pagEs! We will follow you.
Out of curiosity, is anyone focused on LGBT work in French Wikipedia? I just learned about the Wikimedia Francophone convention and asked there too. Wikimedia LGBT is a global community and we would like to use our Twitter account for sharing our work, networking, etc--from anywhere around the world. Keep in touch! RachelWex 01:05, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hi RachelWex there's is an LGBT portal here: http://fr.wiki.x.io/wiki/Projet:LGBT. There is a list of participants than you might wish to contact. Cheers!--Nattes à chat (talk) 20:06, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Nattes à chat (talk)! I will reach out to the folks on the list. Keep in touch! :)
- Hi RachelWex there's is an LGBT portal here: http://fr.wiki.x.io/wiki/Projet:LGBT. There is a list of participants than you might wish to contact. Cheers!--Nattes à chat (talk) 20:06, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
RachelWex 02:24, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Merci Beaucoup!
[edit]Thank you for connecting me with people! I will reach out to Blurby. :) RachelWex 17:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Nattes à chat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Women barnstar for you
[edit]Wiki Loves Women African Feminists | |
Congratulations for finishing 4th place in the African feminists Contest ! - Anthere (talk) 15:10, 5 December 2017 (UTC) |
En fait, ça me parait judicieux vu tout le travail que tu as fourni pour ce concours, sur les listes... l'écriture d'articles, la traduction d'articles et puis le travail de fourmi sur les articles des autres. Merci Natachat pour ta présence dans notre communauté, pour ton énergie et ton intelligence. En espérant que nous mènerons d'autres projets ensemble. Anthere (talk) 15:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Merci Anthere! J'ai été très contente de travailler avec toi sur ce concours.--Nattes à chat (talk) 16:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Genre Pluriels
[edit]Hi Nattes à chat (talk)! Happy new year and bonne année!
You have a great start to your Wikipedia article. I can help edit the English and link to a few more things but at work right now...so will get to it soon if someone does not beat me to it! I will be in touch...
RachelWex 18:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you!--Nattes à chat (talk) 18:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
OK Nattes à chat (talk)...I updated Genre Pluriels the best I could...perhaps folks in Brussels have more information than I would have... Genres Pluriels Also, if Genre Pluriels is associated with other organizations that have Wikipedia pages, you may want to connect those pages together... Keep me posted! It definitely is a great organization.
Les sans pagEs
[edit]Bonjour Nattes à chat (excellent jeu de mots en passant),
J'ai vu que tu es impliquée avec fr:Projet:Les sans pagEs, peut-être que tu peux me dire la raison derrière le E majuscule? J'ai visiter le project plusieurs fois pour répondre à cette question, mais la réponse m'échappe. Est-ce simplement une emphase sur le e usuel du féminin?
Salutations. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- Bonsoir @Headbomb:, ce n'était pas vraiment le focus principal. Le E majuscule est un clin d'œil à l'émiliE, car le projet a démarré en 2015 sur une idée de la fondation Émilie Gourd, qui a mandaté une conférence sur le gender gap au service égalité de l'Université de Genève après avoir lu l'article du NYT à ce sujet en 2011. Par ailleurs, cela fait référence au mouvement des droits civiques américains Malcom X par exemple) ou encore bell hooks, féministe afro américaine. Le fait d'escamoter une majuscule est un symbole de participativité, et se réfère à ce qui est réalisé plutôt qu'à qui les gens sont. Cela se réfère donc à une philosophie humaniste et inclusive. Ensuite le E est la marque du féminin, le mettre en majuscule souligne le fait que les sans pagES se préoccupent du gender gap, mais demeurent un projet inclusif ou chacun·e est bienvenu·e quel que soit son genre (puis qu'on ne fait pas référence aux femmes dans le titre). Quand j'ai cherché le nom, il me paraissait important que ce soit un projet inclusif qui pourrait attirer aussi des contributeurs, ou des personnes ne s'identifiant pas avec un genre binaire. Évidemment le nom est aussi un clin d'œil aux sans culottes, qui était le nom méprisant donné aux manifestant·e·s de milieux populaires des débuts de la révolution française, des hommes qui ne portaient pas les pantalons courts et les bas. Voilà j'espère que cela répond à ta question. --Nattes à chat (talk) 00:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
[edit]Thanks for signing up at Wikipedia:LaGuardia Community College/Translatathon April 2018. I appreciate your participation.
I had to remove you from the sign up sheet because you are a power wiki user. Especially with you editing Wikidata, the metrics you generate are probably going to be more than everyone else put together, so your score here will make the rest of the report challenging to interpret. This is a known problem with the meta:Programs & Events Dashboard, and it is unfair to you because it means that it is hard to include the contributions of experienced Wikipedia contributors. I expect you understand - you do outreach. We all would really appreciate anything you can do to support the event. Most of our French speakers here are of Haitian descent and we do not otherwise have French language support for this event. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:08, 25 April 2018 (UTC) |
- Hi @Blue Rasberry:, fine by me (am I really a power wiki user???), please let me know how me and the other 4 French editors who registered themselves as attendees on the wikiproject page can help best! I met three fabulous contributors of AfroCrowd and they invited me to participate, so I notified my community on les sans pagEs francophone project. Seems some of them got really interested, and having interwiki cooperation is an idea I really like. I asked on the talk page of the translatathon if we could include our witch map as working list too, but it is not really african american, so I did not want to interfere. --Nattes à chat (talk) 18:49, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- It is challenging for me to show the situation and even I do not know everything about how tracking works. at d:Special:Contributions/Nattes_à_chat your Wikidata log shows that 10 days ago you edited Wikidata. The amount of content changes which happen over seconds in Wikidata is uncommon for a couple of hours in Wikipedia, so this throws the event record off if anyone wants to see Wikipedia. I think in the future the tool will change to separate Wikipedia and Wikidata edits, but for now it mixes them. The report it was giving indicated that there were huge Wikidata edits beyond what anyone could expect to happen on Wikipedia. We need the Wikidata records but it is too much to show to the public as the event is starting.
- You signed in at the bottom of the page. That is enough - the event organizers will check all your contributions - Wikipedia and Wikidata - based on that. If anyone edits Wikidata during the event, that is fine.
- From today, now the the event is starting, tell anyone to sign in however they like, either by signing the bottom of the page or by joining the event dashboard as you did.
- I apologize for not being able to explain this better and show screenshots but I already removed your name. After the event you can check again and you will see how Wikidata dominates everything else in the report. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- I understand dont worry! In fact the reason why there were so many wikidata edits it that i was entrering witches and geolocalizing their death place in order for them to appear on the map of persecuted witches! I dont usually do so many wikidata edits. I hope the event goes well, I've translated one article. If some people translate into French we could reread the articles (but I dont know where to look what has been edited. It's night time for me, I will soon be off to sleep. --Nattes à chat (talk) 20:32, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
List of YouTubers
[edit]There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 06:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Merci pour votre travail dans le translatathon!!
[edit]Mes excuses pour la merci en retard! Nous espérons que vous vous joindrez à nous l'année prochaine. (J'ai utilisé Google Translate pour ce message, OUCH).--DrX (talk) 00:26, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Event coordinator
[edit]Hi, the English Wikipedia recently created a new user permission for editors involved in off-wiki outreach work, event coordinator. This new permission allows users to mark accounts for confirmed for up to 10 days, and also allows them to create accounts for events without rate limits without some of the features of the account creator right that aren't used at edit-a-thons and other events. I have added the event coordinator permission to your account and removed the account creator permission, as you appear to have been using it mainly for outreach work.
This should have no noticeable impact on your ability to create accounts, and will give you the extra ability to temporarily confirm accounts if you need to. For more information, you can see the information page on the right, or you can ask me if you have any questions. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you @TonyBallioni:. It is true I mainly use it for outreach during editathons and events. What is a confirmed account? Another feature we might need woth this is the ability to get back drafts of deleted articles. Only admins can do it, and this is sometimes useful when articles are deleted when newbies copy-pasted a passage with author rights. It would allow them to rewrite corectly only the incriminated passage--Nattes à chat (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- The Wikimedia Foundation does not allow access to deleted content to users unless they pass an RfA or an RfA-equivalent for legal reasons. If someone needs deleted content, the best thing to do is contact the deleting administrator.Confirming an account just allows it to create new pages directly in mainspace, move pages (including drafts) to mainspace on your own, and to avoid captchas. This normally is attached automatically after 4 days (autoconfirmed). You can find out more about the right and how to use it at WP:EVC. If you have any other questions, feel free to let me know. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your answers, avoiding the captcha is very valuable! --Nattes à chat (talk) 21:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- The Wikimedia Foundation does not allow access to deleted content to users unless they pass an RfA or an RfA-equivalent for legal reasons. If someone needs deleted content, the best thing to do is contact the deleting administrator.Confirming an account just allows it to create new pages directly in mainspace, move pages (including drafts) to mainspace on your own, and to avoid captchas. This normally is attached automatically after 4 days (autoconfirmed). You can find out more about the right and how to use it at WP:EVC. If you have any other questions, feel free to let me know. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you @TonyBallioni:. It is true I mainly use it for outreach during editathons and events. What is a confirmed account? Another feature we might need woth this is the ability to get back drafts of deleted articles. Only admins can do it, and this is sometimes useful when articles are deleted when newbies copy-pasted a passage with author rights. It would allow them to rewrite corectly only the incriminated passage--Nattes à chat (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!
[edit]Greetings!
You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.
This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.
Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!
If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!
[edit]Greetings!
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Country Winners
- Diversity winner
- High quality contributors
- Gender-gap fillers
- Page improvers
- Wikidata Translators
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Nattes à chat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Looking for help
[edit]Hi,
I was looking for some small help. I created a new article en:Kithaab-a play about women rights issues- which has been copy edited and is ready for translation in various languages. Looking for your possible help in translating the article en:Kithaab to your language. If you are unable to spare time yourself then may be you like to refer the same to some other translator.
Thanking you , with warm regards
Bookku (talk) 07:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Statement at arbitration request
[edit]Hi, I have modified your comment here [2] so it's under a proper subheading. I think you may have misunderstood how the non party thing works. If you're a non party, it's intended that you replace the non party party part with your name and fill in your statement below. Each party or non-party gets their own subheading, and their comments are only under that subheading. Preferably, you should make a copy of the 'sample'/'template' on the bottom of the edit window before filling it in, that way it's there for anyone else to do do the same. Nil Einne (talk) 11:28, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you! Yes you are right, it was a misunderstanding. I am more familiar with the francophone Wikipedia! --Nattes à chat (talk) 09:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!
[edit]Greetings!
After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Diversity winner
- Gender-gap fillers
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
[edit]Greetings!
The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
- Thank you @Jamie Tubers:, too many things to do at the moment, but thanks for the notification!Nattes à chat (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
[edit]Greetings,
Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.
It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.
Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!
Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Better new year!
[edit]I can think of no better aspiration for 2021 than more 19th century dancing, thank you for this and for all you do!--Pharos (talk) 19:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello again !
[edit]Great training so far, thanks :D--Platywiki (talk) 16:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Queering Wikipedia 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16
[edit]The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.
We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.
More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:52, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello Nattes à chat
[edit]Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
[edit]Greetings!
The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!
Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.
The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
[edit]Greetings,
It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.
Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]in friendship
[edit]in friendship |
---|
Thank you for being around, and your good wishes! - Happy new year, in friendship! - One of my pics was on the Main page (DYK) and even made the stats. - In this young year, I enjoyed meetings with friends in real life, and wish you many of those. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you @Gerda Arendt:! Congrats for the DYK achievement :) Nattes à chat (talk) 12:18, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
In case you don't notice the changes on the GAR page: I broke Narodnoye delo into a separate article, since I think it ought to have one and at any rate that section was more about the paper than Elisabeth Dmitrieff. So far, writing Nikolai Utin, I've barely come across anything mentioning any women, even Olga, which is... well, I guess I shouldn't be surprised that all the women get ignored, but nevertheless. (Surprise surprise, Dmitrieff's Swiss Dictionary of Biography article mentions Utin, but his doesn't mention her.) If you think you can find anything else on Dmitrieff and Narodnoye delo, I think that would be a really worthwhile addition. (Not in terms of the GA, just in general.) -- asilvering (talk) 21:37, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- I just went through and started to answer the questions. I have bought a few books on the history of the first international since to dig into this. There are two chapters concerning Narodnoe Delo in Woodford McClelland 's Revolutionnary Exiles, the russians in the first international and the Paris commune. It also describes Nicolas Utin (and Dmitrieff). i have under electronic format as well (makes it easier to search for text when you are contributing). For the moment it is the most precise book I have found for russian exiles in Geneva. Nattes à chat (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Excellent, thank you! I can get that one electronically as well. Fair warning, in case you haven't already noticed: handle this source with some care, as he has an obvious pro-Marxist slant (at the expense of populists/anarchists/liberals/etc) that complicates his discussion of people he clearly really, really wishes were Marxists. It's not just me: if you have jstor access you can find reviews identifying the same issue [3] [4] . -- asilvering (talk) 01:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very useful ! I note although the two reviewa point to an unfair representation of MacClelland of the anarchist group in the first internaltional (or more precisely what would become the Bakounine anarrchist group) bith these articles still give credit to the documented personnal lives he describes. Dmitrieff was more on Utin's side at the time (and Marx) so I think we can trust the accounts, although we have hints in her later life that she took her distances with Marx (this is why she could perhaps join the Jack of heart group, but there is a lack of historic sources on this group. Were they terrorists, robin hoods or bandits ? Or a bit of the three? I would like more material on this but have not found it. I would love to have the photos of the trial too on commons (as Dmitrieff testifeid for her husband). I would also love to have photos of the Dmitrieff museum in Volok. For the moment I will concentrate on digging in Geneva what I can still find. Maybe we could get someone of ru-wp to look into this ? Nattes à chat (talk) 15:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- The anti-anarchist representation I am not so worried about, because it's so transparently obvious; I'm more cautious about anything that could be affected by the pro-Marxist slant, since he appears to want to cast many of these people as Marxists when really it looks like they have been more accurately "friends of Marx" or "interested in Marxism". On the facts of their lives (Dmitrieff visiting Marx in London, for eg) I see no reason to doubt him. Once he starts describing what they believe, or why they did various things, I become more skeptical.
- I don't think your "terrorists, Robin Hoods, or bandits" question can be answered, since it's always going to come down to us through interpretation by someone or other, unless someone manages to turn up a new cache of primary documents somewhere (unlikely). But I am really intrigued. I shouldn't look into it right now because I have other deadlines and I think work on the Jacks of Hearts can wait until the Elisabeth Dmitrieff GA review is done, but I'll see if I can turn up anything on them later this month.
- Asking someone on ru-wp for photos sounds like a good idea! I would love to see how she is presented there, especially since it seems like it will be a bit at odds with what her three Russian biographers have written. -- asilvering (talk) 19:41, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oh. Well actually it turns out the question can be answered to some degree: "In the case of the Jacks of Hearts, conspiracy was at the heart of the case, but the trouble was that the defendants never actually imitated or called themselves the Jacks of Hearts or any other kind of club." That's in the Antonov (2018) article linked on Elisabeth Dmitrieff. He (and one of Dmitrieff's Russian biographers, looks like) are skeptical of all three of the terrorists/hooding/bandits options, with good reason. It looks like the defendants were indeed involved in many crimes/frauds/pranks together (the word one uses may be dependant on your perspective), but that the concept of the "gang" itself was made up by the prosecution so that they could try them under conspiracy charges, which carry stiffer penalties and allow for a mass trial. I made changes to that section of the article on Dmitrieff but my browser crashed before I could send the edits, so I'll have to try again later. -- asilvering (talk) 20:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very useful ! I note although the two reviewa point to an unfair representation of MacClelland of the anarchist group in the first internaltional (or more precisely what would become the Bakounine anarrchist group) bith these articles still give credit to the documented personnal lives he describes. Dmitrieff was more on Utin's side at the time (and Marx) so I think we can trust the accounts, although we have hints in her later life that she took her distances with Marx (this is why she could perhaps join the Jack of heart group, but there is a lack of historic sources on this group. Were they terrorists, robin hoods or bandits ? Or a bit of the three? I would like more material on this but have not found it. I would love to have the photos of the trial too on commons (as Dmitrieff testifeid for her husband). I would also love to have photos of the Dmitrieff museum in Volok. For the moment I will concentrate on digging in Geneva what I can still find. Maybe we could get someone of ru-wp to look into this ? Nattes à chat (talk) 15:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Excellent, thank you! I can get that one electronically as well. Fair warning, in case you haven't already noticed: handle this source with some care, as he has an obvious pro-Marxist slant (at the expense of populists/anarchists/liberals/etc) that complicates his discussion of people he clearly really, really wishes were Marxists. It's not just me: if you have jstor access you can find reviews identifying the same issue [3] [4] . -- asilvering (talk) 01:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- I just went through and started to answer the questions. I have bought a few books on the history of the first international since to dig into this. There are two chapters concerning Narodnoe Delo in Woodford McClelland 's Revolutionnary Exiles, the russians in the first international and the Paris commune. It also describes Nicolas Utin (and Dmitrieff). i have under electronic format as well (makes it easier to search for text when you are contributing). For the moment it is the most precise book I have found for russian exiles in Geneva. Nattes à chat (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
An LGBT Barnstar for you!
[edit]The LGBT Barnstar | ||
For your awesome work in restoring the article History of bisexuality — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 13:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC) |
- Wow thank you @OwenBlacker: :) Nattes à chat (talk) 15:22, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Anarchism
[edit]Hi Nattes à chat,
I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!
And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.
Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 04:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for reaching out to me. Glad to meet you ! On the francophone wikipedia we did extensive work last year on the Paris Commune for the 150 anniversary. A lot of biographies and subects related to the place of women in the Commune were created in French and I will translating these step by step. For example, I worked on Elisabeth Dmitrieff . Nattes à chat (talk) 09:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yes! Some of the articles I had started were translated as part of that effort, which was exciting. I had bought several books with the intent of expanding the Commune's coverage here but never got around to it. Looking forward to your translations! czar 17:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- I think Alix Payen and Adélaïde Valentin): are worth translating, as these are featured article on fr-wp.
- Nattes à chat (talk) 17:37, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yes! Some of the articles I had started were translated as part of that effort, which was exciting. I had bought several books with the intent of expanding the Commune's coverage here but never got around to it. Looking forward to your translations! czar 17:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Translation from French Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit]Hi Nattes à chat, thanks for your translations from French Wikipedia. I noticed that many of your translations fail to properly credit the authors of the original French articles. As this is a requirement based on Wikipedia's licensing requirements, I wanted to make you aware of what the rules are about this.
Please note that while copying or translating material from other Wikipedias is permitted, Wikipedia's licensing requires that proper attribution be given to the authors of the original article. There are three ways of doing this, spelled out in the Wikimedia Terms of Use sect. 7, and it approves the use of the edit summary to credit authors by providing a hyperlink to the original article in the edit summary. The suggested method given by Wikipedia's editing guideline for translated material is to include the following statement in the edit summary where you added translated material:
Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.
If you are copying English-language content from another Wikimedia project, then the editing guideline for copied content suggests this:
Copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution.
Note also that this guideline derives from Wikimedia's Terms of Use, which are not optional, and cannot be ignored. (Please also note, that if you do translations in the other direction (en ⟶ fr), that the Wikimedia terms of use apply to all Wikipedias; see fr:Aide:Crédit d'auteurs, fr:Wikipédia:Citation et réutilisation du contenu de Wikipédia for how French Wikipedia explains this.)
Going forward, please be sure that all of your translations (and additions of copied material) are properly attributed. Note that this isn't limited to just article space; if you translate into Draft space, or your sandbox, or your user talk page, the same considerations apply. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 19:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Attribution has been made on the talk pages of the articles once there were published in the main space. It is true though I did not make attribution on my many sandboxes. @Ipigott: can you help me with this ? I can not go back to all my single edits, I don't know how to do that. I thought it was enough to just notify on the talk page the content had been translated from the French article 22:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC) Nattes à chat (talk) 22:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- No, it's not enough to do it on the Talk page; the talk page template is entirely optional, but it's definitely a nice thing to have it there. All copied and translated material must be credited to the original authors no matter what namespace you place them in, and that includes copying to your sandbox even if it never becomes an article. You do not have to go back to all of your original edits; the guideline already suggests how to handle that; see WP:RIA; I have done this for you at Clara Knecht, in this edit, for example.
- Your modus operandi, based on what I see from your contributed translations, is first to copy over the entire, original French article, in the original French, to your sandbox, as in rev. 1082490103 of Sorella Epstein with the edit summary "new sandbox for translation Sorella Epstein", and then to follow up translating the article, bit by bit, as in rev. 1082572877 (summary: "translated lead from French") and 1082573919 (summary: "translated first section from French") at Sorella Epstein. It is the first of these, the "new sandbox" edit, that should have had attribution, because you copied text from one Wikimedia property covered by CC-BY-SA-3.0 to another; it was on that edit (rev. 1082490103) that should have had the following edit summary, or similar:
New sandbox for translation Sorella Epstein; copied content from the French article [[:fr:Sorella Epstein]]; see that page's history for attribution.
- that would have satisfied the Wikimedia Terms of Use, using the language suggested at WP:CWW. At this point, you can fix the missing attribution by following WP:RIA, similarly to how I did it at Clara Knecht. Please let me know if you need help with this. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 23:31, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ok thank you so I will follow this DIFF and make sure to do proper attribution in the future, thank you for your patience !Nattes à chat (talk) 23:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- No worries. Note: that DIFF is only for fixing articles already copied/translated that didn't have attribution. You might want to read WP:Dummy edit first for those cases; it will help you figure out how to add an edit summary to the article history. In the future for new translations, don't follow that DIFF, follow the suggested text listed in my original post, or just copy it directly from WP:TFOLWP. Mathglot (talk) 23:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Could you give me the exact code under there for your Clara Knecht modification ? I dont know how to link a special diff in the edit summary like you did there DIFF .... Nattes à chat (talk) 00:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- this is what I did DIFF and the link to the first edit does not show Nattes à chat (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Could you give me the exact code under there for your Clara Knecht modification ? I dont know how to link a special diff in the edit summary like you did there DIFF .... Nattes à chat (talk) 00:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- No worries. Note: that DIFF is only for fixing articles already copied/translated that didn't have attribution. You might want to read WP:Dummy edit first for those cases; it will help you figure out how to add an edit summary to the article history. In the future for new translations, don't follow that DIFF, follow the suggested text listed in my original post, or just copy it directly from WP:TFOLWP. Mathglot (talk) 23:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ok thank you so I will follow this DIFF and make sure to do proper attribution in the future, thank you for your patience !Nattes à chat (talk) 23:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- First of all, Nattes à chat, I would like to thank you very sincerely for all the contributions from several different languages you have made in our translation contest. I'm not at all sure my own attribution edits to your articles would be acceptable; it would be far better if you could add them yourself. I did in fact notice that a few of your articles had no talk page with the translation template and no interlanguage links in the LH column of the article itself. I added these where necessary, sometimes by making edits to Wikidata. As you appear to have translated articles more or less word for word, I think you need to follow the instructions under WP:RIA, simply adding a new edit with the necessary attribution. As far as I can see, your edit on User:Nattes à chat/Adélaïde Valentin worked out fine, the only problem is that Adélaïde Valentin has already been translated. Please let me know if you need further assistance.--Ipigott (talk) 08:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you @Ipigott:! I will do my best to correct the articles and to follow the rules. As the translation tool works fine on fr-wp I was not used to applying those manually. I am sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused. Nattes à chat (talk) 09:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I know the translation tool is used widely for translations out of English but the consensus on the EN wiki was that it was leading to far too many unrevised machine translations which simply did not meet basic standards. I hope you don't have to spend too much time on tidying things up. I'm looking forward to many more translated articles.--Ipigott (talk) 09:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
repairing attribution
[edit]- La parole aux négresses : done diff Nattes à chat (talk) 09:37, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Caroline Dayer done DIFF
- Natalia_Ieronimova_Utin Done DIFF
- Caroline Blanco (pastor) Done diff
- Louise Pioger Done DIFF
- Miss Espoir Done DIFF
- Gisela Bulla Done diff
- Le livre de la mutation de fortune Done diff
- Jacqueline Coutras Done diff
- L'Oiselle Done diff
- Thérèse Waounwa Done diff
- Octavie Tardiff Done diff
- Lotte Hattemer Done diff
- Valentina Ivanovna Gagarina Done diff
- Lilya_Budzhurova Done diff
- Sorella Epstein Done diff
- Anna Meder Done diff
- Aïssata Cissé Done diff
- Sardine workers' strike Done diff
- Suzanne_Birnbaum Done diff
- Clara Knecht Done diff
- Nattes à chat, you've done a really good job in repairing insufficient attribution in earlier edits with copied or translated content. All of the articles you listed above are now properly attributed according to our licensing requirements. I'm pinging User:Diannaa, who is an expert on such things and who I sometimes ask for help when there's a problem situation involving copyright or licensing issue, but this time, it's just to let her know that you've done a great job and all is well, and hopefully this will put a smile on her face. Your addition of copy and translation attribution is really appreciated. Keep up the good work! Mathglot (talk) 19:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Paris Commune translations
[edit]Hi again, Nattes à chat! I see you've translated Women in the Paris Commune, which I was working on, and that I accidentally scooped Adélaïde Valentin while you were translating that one! We should probably co-ordinate. I'm most of the way through fr:Céleste Hardouin at the moment. I have some other in-progress translations listed on my userpage, but I haven't got terribly far with any of them (they're mostly there as a to-do list). I'd be happy if you wanted to do any of those, but would appreciate a heads-up if so, so I don't go back to work on them. I also started a stub on Louise Neckbecker, which isn't on fr-wiki yet, if you feel like dropping anything into that. Is there anything you're working on or that you have your eye on that I should avoid? -- asilvering (talk) 23:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Same for me for "Légions des fédérées" ! Yep I had the same idea about coordination.
- I am planning after Women in the commune de Paris to do Alix Payen which is a featured article on fr-wp.
- Should we make a list somewhere ?
- Basically I am working from this (I participated last year to the project) : http://fr.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:%C2%AB_Les_150_ans_de_la_Commune_%C2%BB_:_mois_de_contributions/Suggestions#Biographies
- so let's make a list !
- Céleste Hardouin asilvering
- Alix Payen Nattes à chat
- Victorine Gorget
- Marie La Cécilia
- Rose Caubet
- Marie Mercier (communarde)
- Mina Puccinelli
- Florence Van de Walle
- Anne-Marie Ménand
- Marguerite Lachaise
- Maria Verdure
- Eulalie Papavoine
- Malvina Poulain
- Marie Bediet
- ..... Nattes à chat (talk) 06:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Légion des fédérées is already translated! It's here: Federated Legion of Women. I'll take Alix Payen off my WP:CXT list.
- Ok, I went through the list of communardes at that link, and for convenience, these are the ones that still don't have an en-wiki article (or if they do, it's not linked through wikidata...):
- fr:Victorine Gorget => Nattes à chat
- fr:Marie La Cécilia
- fr:Marie Mercier (communarde)
- fr:Rose Caubet
- fr:Mina Puccinelli
- fr:Florence Van de Walle
- fr:Anne-Marie Ménand
- fr:Marguerite Lachaise
- fr:Maria Verdure
- fr:Léontine Suétens
- fr:Eulalie Papavoine
- fr:Joséphine Marchais
- fr:Malvina Poulain
- fr:Marie Bediet
- Lots still to go! But also, easily doable during this WiR editathon. -- asilvering (talk) 06:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oh hah, you edited your post as I was writing this one. Well, nothing wrong with having the en-wiki list and the fr-wiki list handy in the same place, so I'll leave this one here. -- asilvering (talk) 06:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- yeah ! Choose the ones you want to translate ! To bring anarchy in the process we could envisage both translating parts of an article and submit it "together" too, that would be funny too :).
- Are there parts of the Women in the Paris Commune that you trranslated and that I have not ? This could be added (I am not finished yet). Nattes à chat (talk) 07:20, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- I hope you're doing well! I've had a busy two months, but I just finished Céleste Hardouin and I'm on to Léontine Suétens next. -- asilvering (talk) 01:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oh hah, you edited your post as I was writing this one. Well, nothing wrong with having the en-wiki list and the fr-wiki list handy in the same place, so I'll leave this one here. -- asilvering (talk) 06:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Please can anyone translate the references? English Wikipedia has an {{Article}} template, but it's for a different purpose and not for citations. Thanks, Certes (talk) 21:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Certes Got them, I think. -- asilvering (talk) 00:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Certes are you referring to the Women in the Paris Commune ? I still have refs to correct there, I know. Nattes à chat (talk) 09:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, but I think they're fixed now. The problem is that templates like fr:Template:Article have different names in English Wikipedia. Certes (talk) 11:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- Using the WP:CXT tool fixes a bunch of these automatically but breaks, omits, or does otherwise eccentric things to others. @Nattes à chat, if you haven't tried it for into-English translations before because the actual translation function doesn't work, it might be worth trying it with references in mind to see if you like it any better than fixing them all by hand. I think it saves me time and effort, but it's probably a bit "your mileage may vary". I do still have to fix a lot of them afterwards. -- asilvering (talk) 15:11, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, but I think they're fixed now. The problem is that templates like fr:Template:Article have different names in English Wikipedia. Certes (talk) 11:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you @Asilvering ! Nattes à chat (talk) 09:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Certes are you referring to the Women in the Paris Commune ? I still have refs to correct there, I know. Nattes à chat (talk) 09:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Certes Got them, I think. -- asilvering (talk) 00:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
I would request that this sort of discussion take place at a more central forum, such as WT:FRANCE, where other interested editors could find it and participate in the discussions, and perhaps assist in the effort. (Wherever it resides, it should be linked by other relevant projects, such as WT:WOMEN, WT:BIOG, WT:Women in red, WT:WMNHIST, etc.) It's not too late to hat this discussion, and continue it at WT:FRANCE; see {{Discussion moved to}} / {{Discussion moved from}}. Adding @Certes and Asilvering:. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 02:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Wrt to some of the comments above: I do translations as well, and used to use CXT but no longer do because of too many problems. It's easy enough to build an article from scratch, especially if you start from a copy-paste model. Secondly, regarding translated references, you can put off translating references, while working on building and improving the article: have a look at Template:Lien web. Mathglot (talk) 02:41, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi at the moment I am involved in the month of pride on the francophone wikipedia. I note the request to have the talk on WT:FRANCE though. My next step will be to translate Alix Payen because it is a labelled article on fr-wp but I dont know when I will be able to do it :). I am mostly active on the francophone wikipedia actually. Nattes à chat (talk) 10:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm afraid the only translating I do is when error logs show a mistaken copy-paste of a non-English template. For example, enwiki's equivalent of fr:Modèle:Article is {{Cite journal}}; {{Article}} is unrelated (despite redirecting to {{La}}, which is definitely an article...) Certes (talk) 11:07, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Certes is there a way to get that to automatically be changed to Cite journal? Right now fr-wiki's version of Cite web works that way, which is pretty convenient. I think it's Anomiebot that comes by to do it. -- asilvering (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- That would be nice, but I think it's a question for Anomie or anyone else interested in enhancing the bot. For pages with multiple untranslated refs, I run a very rough and ready script that does the bulk of the translation but the output needs tidying by hand. Certes (talk) 21:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- The
{{lien web}}
to{{cite web}}
works because we can create the former as a wrapper and mark it with{{Subst only|auto=yes}}
. But that won't work for{{Article}}
as that name is already in use for another purpose. Anomie⚔ 22:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)- Ah, bummer. But thanks very much for the explanation! -- asilvering (talk) 00:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- The
- That would be nice, but I think it's a question for Anomie or anyone else interested in enhancing the bot. For pages with multiple untranslated refs, I run a very rough and ready script that does the bulk of the translation but the output needs tidying by hand. Certes (talk) 21:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Certes is there a way to get that to automatically be changed to Cite journal? Right now fr-wiki's version of Cite web works that way, which is pretty convenient. I think it's Anomiebot that comes by to do it. -- asilvering (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- I am not too sure where to move the conversation. Maybe more on women in red WT:Women in red ? @Asilvering do you agree with movong this topic ? Nattes à chat (talk) 17:07, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Frankly, I'm not sure why we would! It's already being done as part of a WiR editathon. We found each other because we were working in the same topic area; I think we'd have noticed if someone else was also working on these translations. -- asilvering (talk) 20:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- No doubt. Would you have noticed, though, if twenty-five other able, willing, and eager bilingual editors were *not* working on these translations? I'm potentially one of the twenty-five, but I don't know who the other twenty-four are, but they could certainly be of help. Mathglot (talk) 22:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- But you have other things you're doing, right? There's no rush for these, so there's no reason to take you or the hypothetical 24 other editors away from whatever else you might be doing. (In your case, this seems like WWII and Jewish history, which surely have an effectively infinite number of translatable articles still to go?) The only deadline is the WiR translation editathon, which you're not in - so I have no reason to assume you'd be interested in it, since it's not like WiR is a niche wikiproject, and this is the third month of the editathon. By the way, if you want to get into writing articles on the Paris Commune, you could do so at any time simply by translating a relevant article, and I'm sure WP:@ would love to have you! (We are a somewhat niche wikiproject, with a list of articles that need translating, many from French!) -- asilvering (talk) 00:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- No doubt. Would you have noticed, though, if twenty-five other able, willing, and eager bilingual editors were *not* working on these translations? I'm potentially one of the twenty-five, but I don't know who the other twenty-four are, but they could certainly be of help. Mathglot (talk) 22:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Frankly, I'm not sure why we would! It's already being done as part of a WiR editathon. We found each other because we were working in the same topic area; I think we'd have noticed if someone else was also working on these translations. -- asilvering (talk) 20:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Congrats, you have a Barnstar!
[edit]The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar | ||
This Barnstar is awarded to Nattes à chat for going the extra mile in repairing copy and translation attribution on numerous articles from French and other languages. Well done! Congratulations, thanks for all your article creations and translations, and happy editing! Mathglot (talk) 19:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC) |
- Thank you ! Nattes à chat (talk) 07:54, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for creating this article and adding it to the Translation Contest listing. Unfortunately you forgot to add your name (four tildes) as the author. I think you are the only one who can correct this.--Ipigott (talk) 06:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Badge and barnstar for you!
[edit]Women in Red Translation Contest | |
Nattes à chat 27 articles Third Place April 2022 Congratulations! WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:18, 1 May 2022 (UTC) |
April third place: Translation Contest: WiR Translation Contest, 2022 |
- Thank you @WomenArtistUpdates: ! I think this is my first contest on this wiki, so it's nice to have a prize ! Nattes à chat (talk) 15:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
a barnstar for you!
[edit]Women in Red Translation Contest contest | |
Nattes à chat Thank you for your additions May 2022 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC) |
@WomenArtistUpdates: thank you ! Nattes à chat (talk) 09:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Six years! |
---|
Precious anniversary
[edit]--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Anniversary @Gerda Arendt: ? Of what I am not aware :/ Nattes à chat (talk) 09:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- there's a link, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes indeed, I missed it ! Thank you :) Nattes à chat (talk) 13:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- there's a link, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Problems in connection with Les sans pagEs on the FR wiki
[edit]In the face of the problems currently facing Les sans pagEs on the FR wiki, allow me to address my full support for the excellent work you have been doing to reduce the gender gap on the French and other language versions of Wikipedia for so many years. I sincerely hope that once these issues have been sorted out, you will be able to continue as an enthusiastic editor as well as executive director of the French project.--Ipigott (talk) 06:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Dear @Ipigott: thank you for your kind words which go directly to my heart. I do hope I can continue the work initiated throughout these years to reduce the gender gap, make wikipedia more inclusive :). Thanks for your help here ! Nattes à chat (talk) 23:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Isabell Olivieri
[edit]NacreWolf (talk) 15:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
[edit]- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
The Signpost: 4 February 2023
[edit]- From the editor: New for the Signpost: Author pages, tag pages, and a decent article search function
- News and notes: Foundation update on fundraising, new page patrol, Tides, and Wikipedia blocked in Pakistan
- Disinformation report: Wikipedia on Santos
- Op-Ed: Estonian businessman and political donor brings lawsuit against head of national Wikimedia chapter
- Recent research: Wikipedia's "moderate yet systematic" liberal citation bias
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Organized Labour
- Tips and tricks: XTools: Data analytics for your list of created articles
- Featured content: 20,000 Featureds under the Sea
- Traffic report: Films, deaths and ChatGPT
The Signpost: 20 February 2023
[edit]- In the media: Arbitrators open case after article alleges Wikipedia "intentionally distorts" Holocaust coverage
- Disinformation report: The "largest con in corporate history"?
- Tips and tricks: All about writing at DYK
- Featured content: Eden, lost.
- Gallery: Love is in the air
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago: Let's (not) delete the Main Page!
- Humour: The RfA Candidate's Song
The Signpost: 9 March 2023
[edit]- News and notes: What's going on with the Wikimedia Endowment?
- Technology report: Second flight of the Soviet space bears: Testing ChatGPT's accuracy
- In the media: What should Wikipedia do? Publish Russian propaganda? Be less woke? Cover the Holocaust in Poland differently?
- Featured content: In which over two-thirds of the featured articles section needs to be copied over to WikiProject Military History's newsletter
- Recent research: "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the Holocaust" in Poland and "self-focus bias" in coverage of global events
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
The Signpost: 20 March 2023
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
The Signpost: 03 April 2023
[edit]- From the editor: Some long-overdue retractions
- News and notes: Sounding out, a universal code of conduct, and dealing with AI
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" case is ongoing
- Featured content: Hail, poetry! Thou heav'n-born maid
- Recent research: Language bias: Wikipedia captures at least the "silhouette of the elephant", unlike ChatGPT
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages
- Disinformation report: Sus socks support suits, seems systemic
The Signpost: 26 April 2023
[edit]- News and notes: Staff departures at Wikimedia Foundation, Jimbo hands in the bits, and graphs' zeppelin burns
- In the media: Contested truth claims in Wikipedia
- Obituary: Remembering David "DGG" Goodman
- Arbitration report: Holocaust in Poland, Jimbo in the hot seat, and a desysopping
- Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
- News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
- Featured content: In which we described the featured articles in rhyme again
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages, part two
- Humour: The law of hats
- Traffic report: Long live machine, the future supreme
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
[edit]- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
The Signpost: 22 May 2023
[edit]- In the media: History, propaganda and censorship
- Arbitration report: Final decision in "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland"
- Featured content: A very musical week for featured articles
- Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
Precious anniversary
[edit]Seven years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:48, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- thank you ! Hyruspex (talk) 05:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 June 2023
[edit]- News and notes: WMRU director forks new 'pedia, birds flap in top '22 piccy, WMF weighs in on Indian gov's map axe plea
- Featured content: Poetry under pressure
- Traffic report: Celebs, controversies and a chatbot in the public eye
The Signpost: 19 June 2023
[edit]- News and notes: WMF Terms of Use now in force, new Creative Commons licensing
- Featured content: Content, featured
- Recent research: Hoaxers prefer currently-popular topics
The Signpost: 3 July 2023
[edit]- Disinformation report: Imploded submersible outfit foiled trying to sing own praises on Wikipedia
- Featured content: Incensed
- Traffic report: Are you afraid of spiders? Arnold? The Idol? ChatGPT?
The Signpost: 17 July 2023
[edit]- In the media: Tentacles of Emirates plot attempt to ensnare Wikipedia
- Tips and tricks: What automation can do for you (and your WikiProject)
- Featured content: Scrollin', scrollin', scrollin', keep those readers scrollin', got to keep on scrollin', Rawhide!
- Traffic report: The Idol becomes the Master
The Signpost: 1 August 2023
[edit]- News and notes: City officials attempt to doxx Wikipedians, Ruwiki founder banned, WMF launches Mastodon server
- In the media: Truth, AI, bull from politicians, and climate change
- Disinformation report: Hot climate, hot hit, hot money, hot news hot off the presses!
- Tips and tricks: Citation tools for dummies!
- In focus: Journals cited by Wikipedia
- Opinion: Are global bans the last step?
- Featured content: Featured Content, 1 to 15 July
- Traffic report: Come on Oppie, let's go party
The Signpost: 15 August 2023
[edit]- News and notes: Dude, Where's My Donations? Wikimedia Foundation announces another million in grants for non-Wikimedia-related projects
- Tips and tricks: How to find images for your articles, check their copyright, upload them, and restore them
- Cobwebs: Getting serious about writing
- Serendipity: Why I stopped taking photographs almost altogether
- Featured content: Barbenheimer confirmed
- Traffic report: 'Cause today it just goes with the fashion
The Signpost: 31 August 2023
[edit]- From the editor: Beta version of signpost.news now online
- News and notes: You like RecentChanges?
- In the media: Taking it sleazy
- Recent research: The five barriers that impede "stitching" collaboration between Commons and Wikipedia
- Draftspace: Bad Jokes and Other Draftspace Novelties
- Humour: The Dehumourification Plan
- Traffic report: Raise your drinking glass, here's to yesterday
The Signpost: 16 September 2023
[edit]- In the media: "Just flirting", going Dutch and Shapps for the defence?
- Obituary: Nosebagbear
- Featured content: Catching up
- Traffic report: Some of it's magic, some of it's tragic
The Signpost: 3 October 2023
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia Endowment financial statement published
- Recent research: Readers prefer ChatGPT over Wikipedia; concerns about limiting "anyone can edit" principle "may be overstated"
- Featured content: By your logic,
- Poetry: "The Sight"
The Signpost: 23 October 2023
[edit]- News and notes: Where have all the administrators gone?
- In the media: Thirst traps, the fastest loading sites on the web, and the original collaborative writing
- Gallery: Before and After: Why you don't need to know how to restore images to make massive improvements
- Featured content: Yo, ho! Blow the man down!
- Traffic report: The calm and the storm
- News from Diff: Sawtpedia: Giving a Voice to Wikipedia Using QR Codes
The Signpost: 6 November 2023
[edit]- Arbitration report: Admin bewilderingly unmasks self as sockpuppet of other admin who was extremely banned in 2015
- In the media: UK shadow chancellor accused of ripping off WP articles for book, Wikipedians accused of being dicks by a rich man
- Opinion: An open letter to Elon Musk
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2023
- News from Wiki Ed: Equity lists on Wikipedia
- Recent research: How English Wikipedia drove out fringe editors over two decades
- Featured content: Like putting a golf course in a historic site.
- Traffic report: Cricket jumpscare
The Signpost: 20 November 2023
[edit]- In the media: Propaganda and photos, lunatics and a lunar backup
- News and notes: Update on Wikimedia's financial health
- Traffic report: If it bleeds, it leads
- Recent research: Canceling disputes as the real function of ArbCom
- Wikimania: Wikimania 2024 scholarships
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 December 2023
[edit]- In the media: Turmoil on Hebrew Wikipedia, grave dancing, Olga's impact and inspiring Bhutanese nuns
- Disinformation report: "Wikipedia and the assault on history"
- Comix: Bold comics for a new age
- Essay: I am going to die
- Featured content: Real gangsters move in silence
- Traffic report: And it's hard to watch some cricket, in the cold November Rain
- Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
[edit]- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
[edit]- From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!
- Special report: Public Domain Day 2024
- Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit
- News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
- WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
- Obituary: Anthony Bradbury
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023
- Comix: Conflict resolution
The Signpost: 31 January 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail
- Opinion: Until it happens to you
- Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry
- Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"
- Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down
The Signpost: 13 February 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia Russia director declared "foreign agent" by Russian gov; EU prepares to pile on the papers
- Disinformation report: How low can the scammers go?
- Serendipity: Is this guy the same as the one who was a Nazi?
- Traffic report: Griselda, Nikki, Carl, Jannik and two types of football
- Crossword: Our crossword to bear
- Comix: Strongly
The Signpost: 2 March 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"
- Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"
- In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record
- Obituary: Vami_IV
- Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday
- WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close
The Signpost: 29 March 2024
[edit]- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue
Nomination of MissJirachi for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MissJirachi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 13:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2024
[edit]- In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics and another wikirace on live TV
- News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law
- WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)
- Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users
- Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem
The Signpost: 16 May 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections
- Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?
- Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24
- Comix: Generations
- Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
Precious anniversary
[edit]Eight years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 8 June 2024
[edit]- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
[edit]- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
The Signpost: 22 July 2024
[edit]- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
Ligue de femmes Suisses contre l'alcoolisme
[edit]Hi there. I just started this page, Ligue de femmes Suisses contre l'alcoolisme, which has limited refs in English, but apparently several in French that are, unfortunately, only available as snippets to me. I think the article is fine as is, but if you wanted to consider creating the French version of it, you'll probably have additional sources available. No worries if you're working on other things or if you think the article doesn't meet FR-WP policy requirements. Really, just wanted to pop over and say hi and mention that I've created it. See you in Poland? -- Rosiestep (talk) 12:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notice ! I added a French source. There are probably many more. Their archives seem to be here https://www.query.sta.be.ch/detail.aspx?ID=53434 in bern
- See you in Katowice indeed :) Nattes à chat (talk) 13:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
a barnstar for you!
[edit]- Second Place - Silver star
Women in Red Translation Contest | |
Nattes à chat 16 articles Second Place July 2024 Congratulations! --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC) |
- Félicitations ! —Eihel (talk) 15:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
[edit]- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
a barnstar for you!
[edit]Women in Red Translation Contest | |
Thank you for your additions August 2024 --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
[edit]- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
[edit]- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
[edit]- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
[edit]- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?