User talk:Nasirakd

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Damon Salvatore, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Spitfire19 ^T/_C 16:42, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I did that so soon, but I'm creating a new page for the character that requires editing right there, you can surely monitor that and let me know if I make any mistakes.Nasirakd (talk) 16:46, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Damon Salvatore.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Damon Salvatore.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notabilty

Character pages have to be notable to be allowed on Wikipedia. I'm Redirected again. Jayy008 (talk) 15:59, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't lie. You didn't create the pages, you reverted edits. Try reading edits summaries as to why the pages don't exist. Jayy008 (talk) 16:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. Basically, those pages aren't allowed because they aren't notable for inclusion. There isn't enough information and it doesn't just mean biography and story. There needs to be sources, character development and reception from the media for character pages. If you can do all of that, then I won't revert again. Sorry for not explaining properly before. Jayy008 (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm afraid not. The only reason is because those pages existed before and the work was not done, if you want the pages back, you can't push the work onto somebody else. As for Google seach, I usually just put "Google," that should be fine as long as you do the fair-use properly. However, that image will be deleted anyway because it has no page. Jayy008 (talk) 19:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. When editors want to contribute correctly, I'm on hand to help, that's my second main function here now. Don't feel discouraged, there's just certain guidelines everyone needs to follow. The basis of the character article works for Music Singles, Season 1 pages and things like that. They all have to have different things that make them notable, if they don't, they get redirected to the main page of the subject. If you have any questions or requests please ask (I'm not here often enough to do major overhauls, but anything else). Just check my hours of operation on the talk-page. Jayy008 (talk) 21:23, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to reply to that part. It was different circumstances, I had a bad attitude when I first started, so that was my main problem. You seem more reasonable and have different issues with editing. Jayy008 (talk) 19:02, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I got over it pretty quickly. And yes, I'm here to help. When I'm online; whatever you need, just ask. Jayy008 (talk) 14:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ryan Kennedy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ryan Kennedy.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This image is going to fail on multiple levels - using a screenshot of a living person which is replaceable - the source is not specific enough to determine who the actual copyright owner/license would be. I'd just let this run it's course - and urge you to find an image that is "free" and usable here. Also, the article is referenced only by TV guide - which might raise some questions of notability for those that monitor biographies. Other reliable sources should be added. Skier Dude (talk 05:21, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From the Google search, link to the direct page the image is from (not google) - eg. I'm showing that this image appears on Like cinema, but is most likely a publicity shot that they picked up from somewhere else. You might want to contact his press people and see if they'll release a 'Creative Commons friendly' image. Skier Dude (talk 05:42, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've hit on the basic problem - this appears to be a screenshot {{non-free television screenshot}} or a publicity shot {{non-free promotional}} - you'll have to look at the source & see what one is more appropriate. Other templates can be found at Category:Non-free Wikipedia file copyright tags . Skier Dude (talk 05:51, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The fan site doesn't say specifically where they got the images (except the vague description at the top of the site). Do you recognize any of them as being from a film? (that's why I thought maybe a screenshot). If they're professional headshots, then the non-free promotional tag would be the safest. Skier Dude (talk 06:07, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Vampire Diaries

It's not up to me, sorry. I formatted it per page guidelines. Jayy008 (talk) 15:04, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I don't have it, but I will find out for you as a gesture of good faith. However, it can be in a different section. It can be under it's own header but the ordering is starring then episodes, after that I don't think it matters, but storylines don't go at the top. I will find someone for the link later. Jayy008 (talk) 16:52, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Smallville (season 10), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. KnownAlias contact 16:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas Scott

It was unsourced and you claimed the show made an error by accident. I assure you they cast Chad Michael Murray knowing he was blonde. You can't make things like that up. It is possible to give birth to a blonde baby if both parents are dark haired. Jayy008 (talk) 12:58, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TVD, season 2.

I think it's a very good idea to move Luka and Elijah to recurring. I don't we should should move Mason as he's dead and will never "pop up again" which is the term for recurring. He had a small guest story. As for Rose, if she dies in the next episode... She'll be a guest star too, so I suggest waiting for her, but if you move her I won't object :) Jayy008 (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the general term is what the source says. When a character is going to recur - The source usually says so. If it doesn't, a recurring characters is a character who has been in a number of episodes in one season and is likely to keep popping up again throughout the course of the show. A Guest-Star can range between one-three-four episodes, basically if they've just come in to have a set story-arc, then leave, never to return. A Special Guest Star, is the same as a guest-star, but on the opening credits to the show it'll same "Special Guest Star" instead. Anything else you need explaining, just ask! Jayy008 (talk) 14:53, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I only know because of somebody I know personally. Either way, it would need to be sourced. No need to apologize, I'm always here to help if there's something you don't understand! Jayy008 (talk) 15:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Colletti

Sorry about my late reply. When it was announced it said he was upgraded for the back-nine, so I thought I would wait, just incase the source was bad. Jayy008 (talk) 15:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand that. He wasn't a regular, he was still credited as guest star but The CW website lists him as a regular from episode 11. It's always best to go with what the episode says, though. Jayy008 (talk) 18:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

I saw your editing on Damon Salvatore's article and I think it will be good if you create the articles of other main characters separately. Thank you. Keivan.f^Talk 13:57, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me, which moderator deleted that page? Keivan.f^Talk 11:10, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message for him and now I'm waiting for his answer. I will talk to you again very soon. Keivan.f^Talk 15:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]