User talk:Nanobug

Hello there

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Thanks maveric, I will stay. I seem to be getting addicted to this thing. It appears that is a common problem among Wikipedians. Nanobug 17:27 11 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Hello. When creating an article, could you be sure to highlight the title word or title phrase where it first appears, like this? Thanks. 131.183.84.166 19:18 2 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Will do. After your change to The Practice Effect I went back and reread the style guide. Thanks for the tip.

One thing I am confused about though: Sould it be bold and italics or just bold? You had the former and most articles seem to use the latter. Or is it different depending on the type of article? Nanobug 17:27 11 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Depends on the article; if it's something that would ordinarily be italicized, like a book title, then you'd want bold and italics in the subject line. But always at least bold on first mention. - Hephaestos 17:30 11 Jun 2003 (UTC)

---

Are you sure you shouldn't have been adding yourself to Wikipedia:Wikipediholics in denial rather than Wikipedia:Confessed Wikipediholics? That didn't sound like much of a "confession" to me. ;) -- John Owens 20:41 13 Jun 2003 (UTC)

I noticed a few others seemed to be somewhat in denial too on Wikipedia:Confessed Wikipediholics, so it seemed I was in good company. Here I am at home now checking Wikipedia again after reading it off and on during the day in work hours (don't tell my boss!), so I guess I can't really deny it any longer.

On the other hand you, I see, are way past being a Wikipediholic - I am just a relative newbie and occasional user, but having fun here anyway.

I love your passing comment to Michael helping your ratings - I wonder when (if ever) he will get it and grow up or go away? Nanobug 02:46 14 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Hi, welcome. Nice work on the CSI article. -- Zoe

Why thank you Zoe. Coming from someone with as much experience on the Wikipedia as yourself the notice is appreciated. -- Nanobug

---

Hiya Nanobug, sorry about the delayed response, but time has been in short supply of late. Hope you're having fun in CT. Yay for the Australian presence! Neolux 23:26, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Ditto on my delayed response. I have been spending all my Wikipedia time in Wikiquote lately, so I hadn't noticed a message was waiting for me. I will be coming back to Australia one of these days. Couldn't stay away for ever from God's own country now could I? Nanobug 19:23, 12 Aug 2003 (UTC)

I saw your message that you would like a copy of the main page wiki-code to use for the WikiQuote page. I have put a copy of it at http://quote.wiki.x.io/wiki/Copy_of_Wikipedia_Main_Page Angela 23:14, 18 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Thank you very much Angela. I will copy it and modify and make an alternative Wikiquote Main Page so we can all compare the two diferrent versions and decide which we like best. Nanobug 02:55, 19 Aug 2003 (UTC)

---

Poof! You've got sysop rights. Use them well. As your first act, let me suggest that you update Wikipedia:Administrators, Wikipedia:Recently created admins and Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to reflect your new status. --Uncle Ed 18:45, 2 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Thank you very much, magic wand wielder. I will. Nanobug 02:20, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)

---

That's a good formating change you made on list of legal topics. I use that list often and adds legal topics when I find it; the TOC was getting unweildly; your compact TOC will save me a bit of time. Thanks. Alex756 06:32, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Thanks. I copied it from somewhere (can't remember where), and have applied it to 31 pages so far, with plenty more to go, all linked on or via List of reference tables, which has lots of lists with alphabetical sections. I have also used a variation of it for lists of years or decades in such pages as List of years in literature. The automatic table of contents introduced with the latest version of the software is a great idea, but for some of these pages you don't get to see the actual text of the page unless you scroll down (or add a compact toc). Nanobug 16:18, 6 Sep 2003 (UTC)

I've mentioned it to another list fanatic (like myself) and also added it to a few lists myself. Perhaps you should put it somewhere on a style page if not already explained. Also, I don't know if the #SECTION command is very well known. I have used it a few times linking to specific sections of pages, I saw it being using somewhere, but I am not sure if it is well documented either; it is sometimes very useful to direct someone directly to a specific article section in another article. Alex756 19:11, 6 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Good idea. I searched around and couldn't find anything, so I added some explanation to Wikipedia:Section, and a link to the details in Wikipedia:How to edit a page. If you see any other good places to add links to Section to, please do. Nanobug 23:29, 6 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Also, I joined the Wikitech mailing list recently and noticed they were taking about automating the horizontal tocs, so don't spend too much time fixing them by hand, as the problem may go away. Assuming of course that they get time to do it, which is not guaranteed considering all the other enhancement requests they have. Nanobug 00:37, 4 Oct 2003 (UTC)

---

You are now a sysop on Wikiquote. -- Tim Starling 08:24, Sep 17, 2003 (UTC)

Much appreciated. Nanobug 12:47, 19 Sep 2003 (UTC)

---

Not much activity on my part lately on Wikipedia or Wikiquote as I've been a bit busy lately installing MediaWiki on my machine (which is probably good considering all the performance problems Wikipedia has been having lately - kudos to Brion and helpers for all their hard work). Took a while but I eventually got MYSQL, Apache, PHP, and the MediaWiki (Wikipedia) software installed and up and running. Now I just have to get it installed on a proper server... Nanobug 11:44, 3 Oct 2003 (UTC)

---

Nick, what techniques have you been using to get buy-in from the Aperture Technologies employees?...

So far it is just being used by our development group for project management.

• This group has not been happy with our current method of distributing project outlines and documentation which is to E-Mail them around. The E-Mails get lost and outdate off our server after 35 days if you don't reset their expiration date.
• E-Mailed documentation can't hyperlink each other.
• If the author updates the document everyone sees it immediately on the wiki.
• The documentation is easy to find on the wiki.
• Each developer has to write a weekly status report. The wiki is a good way to do this.

So these factors create a ready made market for our wiki, which we named Aperture Lightbox.

Another factor is the head of the department is going gangbusters over it and has decreed everyone to use it as much as possible. Top down influence has a big effect in getting something adapted.

A good way to get something like this adapted is to target it for a very specific application. For example to get people to use the E-Mail system at the Westport, CT public schools, we got the superintendent of schools to use it as the only way to distribute meeting announcements. It seems to me that at Gartner, you may want to target this for creating and distributing certain kinds of reports. (Is Gartner still in Greenwich, CT?)

Once it is being used for a specific application it should naturally spill over to other uses.

NickP 04:03, Feb 26, 2004 (UTC)

Nick, yes Gartner is still in CT, in Stamford (next to Greenwich). We have actually had our research people adopt the wiki in a big way, collaboratively authoring research articles, and it is working out well. It is slowly being adopted by more and more people within the company. We have upgraded to Mediawiki 1.3, have it running on a decent server, and it looks set to become a permanent fixture. That is why I haven't been doing much Wikipedia editing lately, I'm too busy with Gartnerpedia. ~ Nanobug 13:50, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)

---

Hi, I was just curious as to why you seem to have vandalized Wikipedia:Tutorial (Wikipedia links) to say Gartnerpedia instead of Wikipedia. Any reason for this? Quandaryus 05:57, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)

My humblest apologies, it was not intentional. I was obviously too tired late last night. I was copying the tutorial text for our own Mediawiki project, Gartnerpedia, to help some of our newbie users with the basics, and accidentally copied it into Wikipedia instead after doing a search and replace in my text editor version. I won't let that happen again. ~ Nanobug 13:50, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

User Categorization

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Australia page as living in or being associated with the Australian Capital Territories. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in ACT for instructions. Rmky87 22:16, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Gartner

An editor has nominated the article Gartner for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gartner. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Gartner during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. NickelShoe (Talk) 04:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 21:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}

AfD nomination of List of research companies

List of research companies, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of research companies satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of research companies and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of research companies during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Oli Filth 02:24, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Recent Changes Camp Canberra Aug 11, 2010

I saw you're listed in the ACT Wikipedian page and thought, by chance, you might like to come to this:

RecentChangesCamp, Canberra is being held at the University of Canberra, Building 7, Room 7XC37 on 11 August 2010.
ABOUT | REGISTRATION | SCHEDULE

Hope we'll see you and friends there, but please register so we can prepare lunch. Leighblackall (talk) 07:29, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for inviting me, but am currently living in the USA, so wasn't able to attend :) (time to take myself off the ACT wikipedian list I guess)

MSU Interview

Dear Nanobug,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.206.39 (talk) 03:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting

	New England Wikimedia General Meeting
	The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future! Potential topics: What is a Wikimedia chapter and should we work towards one? Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?) Planning for upcoming coordinated events (Wikipedia Love Libraries, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiknic, etc.) Outreach to universities (WikiProject Academical Village) and cultural institutions (GLAM) Wikimania DC is this summer. Your ideas!
	Sunday, April 22 1:30 PM – 4:30 PM	Conference Room C06, Johnson Building, Boston Public Library—Central Library 700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

---

Message delivered by Dominic at 08:50, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!

Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ari Taub (director), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German, Italian and American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambig

Hello. At Ari Taub, I saw that without an indication in the edit summary you deleted the content to make way for a redirect to a disambig page. Perhaps there is a reason for that, but I'm not sure what it would be, and could not glean it from the edit summary, so I have reverted. Olympic athletes are generally considered sufficiently notable to warrant an article, which adds to my support that perhaps the deletion of the stand-alone was not intentional or perhaps I am not aware of an underlying reason. You can reply here if you wish to discuss. Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 14:56, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi Epeefleche. Sorry I missed one of the edit summaries, I was editing quite a few pages that day.

There are actually two Ari Taubs in Wikipedia:

• Ari Taub (director), an American movie director, producer, and editor
• Ari Taub, a Canadian Greco-Roman wrestler

I copied the content of the wrestler's page to Ari Taub (wrestler). I then created a disambiguation page for both of them, and then redirected the Ari Taub page to the disambiguation page. I then went to every other page I could find in Wikipedia that pointed to Ari Taub and pointed them to Ari Taub (wrestler) instead.

And full disclosure, yes, I created the movie director page a few months ago. I thought I would wait a while before disambiguating to make sure everyone was happy with the new page. Which they seem to be.

If all that seems reasonable to you, I will let you revert the Ari Taub page back.

Peace. ~ Nanobug (talk) 16:03, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

PS If you look at the next section in my talk page, just below, it mentions that your original link to Pan American Championships is actually a disambig page. I'm not sure which one you were referring to, so will let you tweak it accordingly. Cheers mate.

Hello Nanobug - I tripped over this Ari Taub issue today while attempting to fix ambiguous links. I found the two identical articles: Ari Taub and Ari Taub (wrestler). Clearly, one should redirect to the other, but after having read the preceding conversation, I'm not sure which should point to the other. Any opinions? PKT(alk) 13:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ari Taub (wrestler), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pan American Championships (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting

You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18

NE Meetup #4: January 18 at MIT Building 5

Dear Fellow Wikimedian, You have been invited to the New England Wikimedians 2014 kick-off party and Wikipedia Day Celebration at Building Five on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 05:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

You're invited: Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March

Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March - You are invited!

New England Wikimedians is excited to announce a series of Wikipedia edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of Wikiwomen's History Month from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click here). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of Boston, Northampton, South Hadley, and Cambridge. Further information on dates and locations can be found on our user group page. Questions? Contact Girona7 (talk)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Acalamari 10:00, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

You're invited!

NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square

Dear Fellow Wikimedian, New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter. We hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) and Maia Weinstock (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial edit-a-thons

Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England

As you may have already heard, the Wikipedia community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a worldwide series of tributes, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows: May 21st at Northeastern University's Snell Library, in the Digital Scholarship Commons on the second floor May 22nd at Brown University's Rockefeller Library, in the Digital Scholarship Lab June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA), where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Wikipedia for the first time. If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

New England Wikimedians summer events!

Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!

After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested: Cape Cod Wiknic and Photography Blitz on June 14th in Barnstable County, with complete travel reimbursements available for those who participate Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial Edit-a-thon on June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA), where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand 3rd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, which will feature at least one guest speaker, and possibly many more Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August: Wikimania 2014 in London If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

New England Wikimedians summer events!

Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!

After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested: Cape Cod Wiknic and Photography Blitz on June 14th in Barnstable County, with complete travel reimbursements available for those who participate Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial Edit-a-thon on June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA), where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand 3rd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, which will feature at least one guest speaker, and possibly many more Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August: Wikimania 2014 in London If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

Inactive on Wikiquote?

Hi, I noticed you have not edited at Wikiquote in quite a long time, and are listed as an inactive administrator. Do you think there is any chance you will be back? Cheers! — Cirt (talk) 19:37, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Hey Cirt, I will be doing the occasional edit here and there, but just don't have time to do much on Wikipedia anymore unfortunately. Life got too busy. I notice I was removed from the list of admins due to my inactivity, which is fine. Thanks for asking, and happy editing! :-) Nanobug (talk) 15:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA

You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:29, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA

Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic

You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck. Sunday July 16 New England Wiknic (also on Facebook) 1–5pm - come by any time! Look for us by the Wikipedia / Wikimedia banner! We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)