User talk:Nagihuin

Welcome!

Hello, Nagihuin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Vsmith (talk) 23:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss your edits to empire and be aware of WP:3rr. Vsmith (talk) 23:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That applies also to the American imperialism articles where you are also edit warring - stop and discuss your concerns on the article talk pages. Vsmith (talk) 23:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at American imperialism. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 00:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A new talk in American_Imperialism has started to gain Consensus, Thank you. I think the whole thing was using the words USA 'de facto' empire in a map showing military and economic alliances involving the USA. User SantiLak didn't agree it was an empire. The word "empire" might be used with extreme care then.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nagihuin (talk • contribs) 02:03, 26 April 2015

I've removed your map from Triadization as I don't see the relevance there. Also, a minor edit is an edit that is truly minor - such as adding a missing period or a simple spelling error fix and many editors ignore those edits. Please don't mark substantial edits as "minor". And please "sign" your talk page edits by adding four tildes (~~~~) at the end. Vsmith (talk) 13:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CANVASS

This is NOT going to help your case at all, please review Wikipedia:Canvassing, this could make any consensus you may receive, suspect and/or void. Mlpearc (open channel) 14:21, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The only ones Canvassing here are you both Vsmith and Mlpearc, championing the case of Santilak, an user surprisingly suprised of the use of the term "USA DE FACTO EMPIRE" in an American_Imperialism entry, and now filling my talk page with warnings, icons and violent speech. Oh god.Nagihuin (talk) 14:39, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't being canvassed to but also my biggest issue with the map wasn't the name, it's how incredibly misleading it is. - SantiLak (talk) 02:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Both of you need to review Wikipedia:Canvassing, because that looks like the definition of the action. Mlpearc (open channel) 02:42, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm well aware of what canvassing is, I may have not made myself clear in my previous comment, I was trying to say that I'm not going to give into the canvass because I don't agree with the map. - SantiLak (talk) 02:57, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've read about this dispute and I really see no sense in it, I know Nagihuin and he's a fantastic map maker, could you please Santilak join the talk in American_Imperialism and give precise definitions and reasons about your disagreement? At this point I only see "I don't agree with the map" sentences but no objective reason besides those claims. This is pure ego.LadyBeth (talk) 08:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think insulting other editors is the best way to go about gaining consensus, also I find it interesting that you just started editing and you only have edited in relation to Nagihuin and their dispute. - SantiLak (talk) 09:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You started this childish edit warr, Santilak, and I'm not going to stop until you reconsider your position. I'm also going to follow closely your contributions, applying the same follow-and-disagree policy you're using now.LadyBeth (talk) 10:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First off, threats are not the way WP works so you need to learn that quick. It's hard to reconsider my position in any way when you are threatening me and saying you will follow all of my contributions and revert them. - SantiLak (talk) 18:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Santilak, she didn't say so, you're overrreacting and exaggerating. She only said she was going to follow closely your interventions and contributions, because you're probably biasing them -which is perfectly deductible from the personal harassment you are conducting all over my work-and that leads us to a worse Wikipedia.Nagihuin (talk) 18:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am subject to continuing abuse by Vsmith and Mlpearc

This is a simple note: My work is being destroyed by Vsmith and Mlpearc, so I am not free to publish my work.

Nagihuin (talk) 14:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sock notification

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nagihuin. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LadyBeth is a friend of mine, active reader of Wikipedia that decided on her own to register herself and defend my case, because of the personal harassment Im subject to by you, Mlpearc, amongst others.Nagihuin (talk) 19:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just because people won't agree with your position on something, does not mean that they are harassing you. - SantiLak (talk) 20:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's harassment:

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/harass ha·rass (hə-răs′, hăr′əs) tr.v. ha·rassed, ha·rass·ing, ha·rass·es 1. To subject (another) to hostile or prejudicial remarks or actions; pressure or intimidate.

The prejudicial actions consist of removing my work wherever it is. The pressure is conducted by Wikipedia Administrators championing your case.

Nagihuin (talk) 20:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP: Harassment - Wikihounding by Santilak over work of Nagihuin

Santilak is perpetrator of Wikihounding over the work of Nagihuin, the case should be elevated to Arbitrators and Administrators soon.

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikihounding

WIKIHOUNDING BY SANTILAK ON AMERICAN_IMPERIALISM

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=American_imperialism&action=history 1. Nagihuin posts a map. http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=American_imperialism&oldid=659173706 2. First Santilak action: UNDOING without giving a reason http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=American_imperialism&oldid=659211177 3. Nagihuin reposts it giving a reason: http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=American_imperialism&oldid=659211741 4. Santilak continues its actions 2 times more.

WIKIHOUNDING BY SANTILAK ON EMPIRE

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Empire&action=history 5. Nagihuin posts a map. 6. Santilak removes it 3 times more while Nagihuin gives reasons. Santilak does not start a talk.

WIKIHOUNDING BY SANTILAK ON PAX_AMERICANA.

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Pax_Americana&action=history 7. Nagihuin posts a map. 8. Santilak removes it 3 times while Nagihuin and me try to explain that the map is needed.

WIKIHOUNDING BY SANTILAK ON HEGEMONY.

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Hegemony&action=history 9. Nagihuin posts a map. 10. Santilak removes it with peregrine reasons.

WIKIHOUNDING BY SANTILAK ON LIST_OF_UNITED_STATES_MILITARY_BASES

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=List_of_United_States_military_bases&action=history 11. Nagihuin posts a map. 12. Santilak removes it 2 times.

WIKIHOUNDING BY SANTILAK ON SUPERPOWER

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=List_of_United_States_military_bases&action=history 13. Nagihuin posts a map. 14. Santilak removes it until other users stop him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LadyBeth (talk • contribs) 09:47, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nagihuin. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:18, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Empire

There's a discussion on the talk page about the map to use, please join that. Doug Weller talk 20:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]