User talk:Mufcinfo21

June 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Orange Mike | Talk 20:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike, nice to e-meet you. {{unblock|reason=Your reason here [[User:Mufcinfo21|Mufcinfo21]] ([[User talk:Mufcinfo21#top|talk]]) 21:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)}}

im wondering/challenging why you have blocked me from editing when there are currently existing hundreds & hundreds of mufcinfo.com's unique pages currently linked to player pages on wiki.

I have today chosen a few pages where the profile isnt currently linked via wiki for that player to spread the info to all users & fill out the gaps. im a massive user of wiki & have been for years & also joined the contributors pages today to help others build up wiki for the millions of users. I cant see what ive done wrong only to keep going what is already underway by adding a player profile for every Newton Heath & or Manchester United player on wiki. i look forward to your reply & some advice as i feel i have not done anything wrong. Mufcinfo21 (talk) 21:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The relevant guideline is at WP:COI. Since you apparently have an affiliation with the website you're trying to add to these articles, it comes across as self-promotion. – Pee Jay 23:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You placed a blank unblock request template, but seem to be communicating with the blocking admin- unblock requests are to ask for a third party to review the block. If you want to negotiate with OrangeMike, you don't need to make an unblock request. If you want someone else to review your matter, please place a new unblock request below, and replace the words "your reason here" with your statement. 331dot (talk) 09:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike, hope your well. thanks for the info. id like to discuss with you

im continuing the work of hundreds of wiki users who have already linked mufcinfo filling the gaps where the player profiles are not currently on the player pages, the info is second to none from this site & is incredibly detailed & unique giving the user statistics not seen anywhere.

please can you help me to resolve this and give some advice so im able to increase the wiki users experience. Mufcinfo21 (talk) 18:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, neither of the people who have responded to your unblock request is Mike. Second, it's clear you have ties to the website you're trying to add to those articles. That's why you were blocked. The quality of the website is not in dispute. – Pee Jay 21:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]