User talk:MrCboY1997

MrCboY1997, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MrCboY1997! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bsoyka (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello MrCboY1997! Your additions to 57th Academy Awards have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:24, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Category:Fictional amputees, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop screwing around. Drmies (talk) 01:01, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Face Off (Breaking Bad). Binksternet (talk) 00:29, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to The Menu (2022 film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Menu (2022 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 14:54, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At least capitalize "A Movie Star" and "Sommelier". MrCboY1997 (talk) 14:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Abominable (2019 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. If you've found a source confirming that a specific person voiced this film, please cite it. IMDb suggests it's another person with the same name. Belbury (talk) 16:32, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Saul Goodman, you may be blocked from editing. Your assertion that Saul Goodman is a crime boss was not mentioned anywhere in the article and is not supported by any of the sources in the article. Accordingly, it is inappropriate to include the article in Category:Fictional crime bosses. See Wikipedia:Categorization and Wikipedia:Defining for more information. — SamX [talk · contribs] 03:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should just stop adding categories altogether. It's obvious from previous discussions and your continuing misuse of them that you don't understand how they work. If you continue being disruptive, you're more than likely going to get blocked. 12:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC) Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 12:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop with the categories. You're just being disruptive. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 16:53, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay, he is a capo though, I'm not trying to be distruptive. MrCboY1997 (talk) 17:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kim Wexler. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – ².O.^Boxing 13:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

im not trying to edit war. MrCboY1997 (talk) 19:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hypocorisms

Please read the guidance at WP:HYPOCORISM. It explains that "if a person has a common English-language hypocorism (diminutive or abbreviation) used in lieu of a given name, it is not presented between quotation marks or parentheses within or after their name." So these sorts of "short forms" aren't included in a fully expressed name. In this case [1], "Mike" is just a short form for "Michael". Thanks. _signed,Willondon (talk) 19:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the same goes for Fring. The first sentence of the article begins with, Gustavo "Gus" Fring. Maybe i'm just confused. MrCboY1997 (talk) 20:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They way I phrase stuff can be kinda confusing. I apologize that I made you confused here. MrCboY1997 (talk) 20:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize as it's not your fault. Soon after I learned to speak, I became confused about things, and it's pretty much been that way ever since. I fixed the Gustavo "Gus" Fring article, too. Being crowd-sourced, Wikipedia has a number of inconsistencies in how policies and guidelines are implemented. And you wouldn't have to dig too far to find inconsistencies or conflicts among the guidelines themselves. As you learn more, and become more confident in what the community position is on things, you can feel confident about fixing things like "Gus" yourself. Cheers. _signed,Willondon (talk) 20:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, half a good day! MrCboY1997 (talk) 22:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm Cakelot1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ballin' (Mustard and Roddy Ricch song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 07:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I just wanted to see if that paragraph would be okay with admin. It's not really that important to put on the page. I know it's not mis-info, but I probably should've put in some reliable sources. MrCboY1997 (talk) 12:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]