User talk:Motorhead69
Speedy deletion of "David slepski"
[edit]
A page you created, David slepski, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. Mifter (talk) 04:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Can't Stop!
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Can't Stop! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Truthanado (talk) 04:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Tom vitucci"
[edit]A page you created, Tom vitucci, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a test page. Use the sandbox for testing.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. — Jake Wartenberg 18:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
January 2009
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Vandalism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 17:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Viacom, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Viacom was changed by Motorhead69 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-01-22T18:09:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia. Rich Farmbrough, 18:22 22 January 2009 (UTC). 18:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Motorhead69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I stopped vandalizing after my last warning, what did i vandilize this time, if I did vandalize i'm sorry for my rude actionsm i will stop
Decline reason:
No, you didn't stop. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 17:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Motorhead69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'll never vandalize again from now on, give me one last chance
Decline reason:
We'll offer a second chance, but you will need to demonstrate you are able and willing to constructively contribute to the project. Follow the directions at {{2nd chance}} carefully, remembering that we are looking for very substantial improvements to an article, not just spelling checks or minor changes. Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You don't remove a previous unblock request when you make a new one. I added your last one back in so all admins will have full access without going through the history. Templarion (talk) 01:59, 24 January 2009 (UTC)