User talk:MookieZ
Totally agree with you about the Todd Gold book; I will only use it for the non-controversial stuff, but if more original citations can be found, then great. Don't envy you tackling the line up issue - always gonna be difficult. I'll take a look though. Rikstar 23:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm learning ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by J0rdantay10r (talk • contribs) 03:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:03, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]My Thunderbird is currently off the road and in need of an engine rebuild (unsurprising at 180,000 miles) but it will run again ;) As solid as those cars are built, I suspect if someone hit one there'd be more damage to the other car ... Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 04:31, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Edit summaries
[edit]Sorry, I will try to add edit summaries in the future such as for "Wouldn't It Be Nice" etc... Cheers :) --Sahafan 04:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
re: Only with You
[edit]Hey Mookie..... I thought I had checked/moved all the links???? In fact I swear I did do it, unless I am completely hallucinating, if I forgot some or all or spaced out on this one, my apologies. Normally that's a big pet peeve of mine. Thanks for the heads-up. - eo (talk) 14:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Request for Rollback
[edit]Hi, I've granted your request for rollback. If you need any help at all please let me know. Pedro : Chat 14:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Happy Endings (song)
[edit]You said:
- Just wanted to say that I am going to get around to writing an article about The Beach Boys song at some point. It's been on my mental list of things to do for a while now. I will probably put it at Happy Endings (Beach Boys song), so if that is wrong place to put it, let me know. Thanks!
You can probably just put it at Happy Endings (song) if you want. The Lee Brice song of the same name is definitely not notable enough for its own page (although I think it's a good song). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Carnie Wilson
[edit]I am changing "1990s" to "1980s" because Wilson Phillips's biggest hit, Hold On, is a dance-pop song. Many artists in the 80's performed dance pop, Madonna for example. Notice that there were no hit songs of this style after the year 1990. There were a few that charted in 1991, but were all recorded in 1990. According to the traditional Gregorian calendar, the 1980s are 1981-1990. Read 20th century. Note that the 20th century is 1901-2000, not 1900-1999. Synthpop underwent a change in 1981 with the release of Don't You Want Me, for example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eileen's Dream (talk • contribs) 17:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Your 20th century arguement would be spot-on if you wanted to insert 'the 10th decade of the 20th century' or 'the 200th decade', but 1980s consist of the years 1980-1989. Read 1980s, the very first sentence. I will remove 1980's again, since it is inaccurate, but since you feel so strongly about it, I will not put 1990s back in. I don't think that either really needs to be there. MookieZ (talk) 21:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Waterloo Schools
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)