User talk:Moniker42
Freenode Image
[edit]There is no server in Moscow. lem.freenode.net is off service since May 28, 2007. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
P.S. Please, upload images to Wikimedia Commons and use the word freenode in the name of this image. «Continents» is really a very bad choise. Incnis Mrsi (talk)
- Your image is very outdated... there are currently servers in the following locations, if you feel like updating it:
- Taoyuan, TW, Asia;
- Fremont, CA, US;
- Irvine, CA, US;
- Los Angeles, CA, US;
- San Diego, CA, US;
- Washington, DC, US;
- Missoula, MT, US;
- Newark, NJ, US;
- Corvallis, OR, US
- Madison, WI, US;
- Frankfurt, DE, EU;
- Helsinki, FI, EU;
- Evry, FR, EU;
- Milan, IT, EU;
- Vilnius, LT, EU;
- Umeå, SE, EU;
- Manchester, England, UK, EU. If you view the source, these are all in a nice list format. Have a nice day! :) Guesty-Persony-Thingy :(talk) 05:19, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks both, I've updated the image and uploaded it as Image:Freenodeservers.png to the Commons Moniker42 (talk) 07:59, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Sweet_sixteen_cap.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sweet_sixteen_cap.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 21:53, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Shiny
[edit]The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
In true (and I mean this) recognition of your hard work over the past years. Keep it up! :) Martinp23 02:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion of Image:Freenodenew titlepurple.png
[edit]A tag has been placed on Image:Freenodenew titlepurple.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Freenodenew titlepurple.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
The article Andrina Stiles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication this historian meets WP:ACADEMIC or WP:AUTHOR: Low citations, no indications of scholarly honors, etc. Appears to be a run-of-the-mill historian; I can find no information about her life.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 07:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Moniker42. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Moniker42. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)