This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
SCAM WARNING!
If someone contacts you asking for money to get a draft published, improve a draft, or restore a deleted article—do not trust them! These offers are scams. Report them to paid-en-wpwikipedia.org. See WP:SCAM for more information.
This user talk page often deals with similar or reoccurring topics. Generic titles of messages may be refactored for clarity, such as renaming the section title to a link of the topic page.
This user is a regular and doesn't mind if you template him. Though he will appreciate if you expand on your reasoning should your concern not be immediately apparent.
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.
I do not remove personal attacks directed at me from this page. If you spot any, please do not remove them, even if vile, as they speak more against the attacker than against me.
@FIELDCONSULT: Hi Art, thanks for the information. I've made the changes to the bibliography section per the information at openlibrary.org. I see you also added some more OL numbers in the article but they may have been reverted. Apologies if the Wiki markup and <ref> tags can be difficult to approach at times. I will take a look at those edits as well and see if I can restore them properly when I get back from the holidays.
Once I went looking for it, I could see the changes. I'm not sure I would say it's "fixed", @XD Living—I've left a comment with some guidance. I won't decline it a second time, but I would suggest that the neccessary changes be made. It also a little sparse on details. Make sure your showing in-depth (WP:SIGCOV) coverage of the topic itself such that the topic meets our WP:Notability requirements. Otherwise, this might be better added to an existing topic.