User talk:Mattbuck/Archive8
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Mattbuck. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 01 April 2015
- In the media: Wiki-PR duo bulldoze a piñata store; Wifione arbitration case; French parliamentary plagiarism
- Featured content: Stop Press. Marie Celeste Mystery Solved. Crew Found Hiding In Wardrobe.
- Traffic report: All over the place
- Special report: Pictures of the Year 2015
The Signpost: 08 April 2015
- Traffic report: Resurrection week
- Featured content: Partisan arrangements, dodgy dollars, a mysterious union of strings, and a hole that became a monument
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Arbitration report: New Functionary appointments
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 15 April 2015
- Traffic report: Furious domination
The Signpost: 22 April 2015
- In the media: UK political editing; hoaxes; net neutrality
- Featured content: Vanguard on guard
- Traffic report: A harvest of couch potatoes
- Gallery: The bitter end
The Signpost: 29 April 2015
- Featured content: Another day, another dollar
- Traffic report: Bruce, Nessie, and genocide
- Recent research: Military history, cricket, and Australia targeted in Wikipedia articles' popularity vs. quality; how copyright damages economy
- Technology report: VisualEditor and MediaWiki updates
GA Notice
GA Notice |
---|
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Shirehampton railway station that you recently nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Vincent60030 (talk) 05:38, 1 May 2015 (UTC) |
· · · |
Your GA nomination of Shirehampton railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shirehampton railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vincent60030 -- Vincent60030 (talk) 05:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Shirehampton railway station
The article Shirehampton railway station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shirehampton railway station for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vincent60030 -- Vincent60030 (talk) 11:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 6 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Template:Shirehampton railway station services page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 May 2015
- News and notes: "Inspire" grant-making campaign concludes, grantees announced
- Featured content: The amorous android and the horsebreeder; WikiCup round two concludes
- Special report: FDC candidates respond to key issues
- Traffic report: The grim ship reality
Your GA nomination of Shirehampton railway station
The article Shirehampton railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shirehampton railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vincent60030 -- Vincent60030 (talk) 03:21, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Sea Mills railway station services
Template:Sea Mills railway station services has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 10:14, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 May 2015
- Foundation elections: Board candidates share their views with the Signpost
- Traffic report: Round Two
- In the media: Grant Shapps story continues
- Featured content: Four first-time featured article writers lead the way
The Signpost: 20 May 2015
- From the editor: Your voice is needed: strategic voting in the WMF election
- Traffic report: Inner Core
- News and notes: A dark side of comedy: the Wikipedia volunteers cleaning up behind John Oliver's fowl jokes
- Featured content: Puppets, fungi, and waterfalls
- In the media: Jimmy Wales accepts Dan David Prize
- WikiProject report: Cell-ebrating Molecular Biology
- Arbitration report: Editor conduct the subject of multiple cases
Nomination for deletion of Template:Filton railway station services (second)
Template:Filton railway station services (second) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 12:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Future Rail Insert
Template:Future Rail Insert has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 12:46, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 June 2015
- News and notes: Three new community-elected trustees announced, incumbents out
- Discussion report: The deprecation of Persondata; RfA – A broken process; Complaints from users on Swedish Wikipedia
- Featured content: It's not over till the fat man sings
- Technology report: Things are getting SPDYier
- Special report: Towards "Health Information for All": Medical content on Wikipedia received 6.5 billion page views in 2013
- Traffic report: A rather ordinary week
First Great Western article name
FYI, based on additional information received that the First Great Western franchise will be rebranded as Great Western Railway, not the abbreviated GWR as previously suggested, I have amended the discussion at Talk:First Great Western to reflect. This may or may not influence your previously given preference on this matter. D47817 (talk) 02:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 June 2015
- News and notes: Chapter financial trends analyzed, news in brief
- Traffic report: Two households, both alike in dignity
- Featured content: Just the bear facts, ma'am
- Technology report: Wikimedia sites are going HTTPS only
The Signpost: 17 June 2015
- Arbitration report: An election has consequences
- News and notes: Labs outage kills tools, self; news in brief
- Featured content: Great Dane hits 150
- Discussion report: A quick way of becoming an admin
- WikiProject report: Western Australia speaks – we are back
The Signpost: 24 June 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost tagging initiative
- Featured content: One eye when begun, two when it's done
- Technology report: 2015 MediaWiki architecture focus and Multimedia roadmap announced
- News and notes: Board of Trustees propose bylaw amendments
- Arbitration report: Politics by other means: The American politics 2 arbitration
The Signpost: 01 July 2015
- News and notes: Training the Trainers; VP of Engineering leaves WMF
- In the media: EU freedom of panorama; Nehru outrage; BBC apology
- WikiProject report: Able to make a stand
- Featured content: Viva V.E.R.D.I.
- Traffic report: We're Baaaaack
- Technology report: Technical updates and improvements
Your GA nomination of Montpelier railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Montpelier railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rcsprinter123 -- Rcsprinter123 (talk) 16:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Montpelier railway station
The article Montpelier railway station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Montpelier railway station for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rcsprinter123 -- Rcsprinter123 (talk) 16:00, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Montpelier railway station
The article Montpelier railway station you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Montpelier railway station for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rcsprinter123 -- Rcsprinter123 (talk) 16:41, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 July 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation annual plan released, news in brief
- In the media: Wikimania warning; Wikipedia "mystery" easily solved
- Traffic report: The Empire lobs back
- Featured content: Pyrénées, Playmates, parliament and a prison...
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 15 July 2015
- Op-ed: On paid editing and advocacy: when the Bright Line fails to shine, and what we can do about it
- Traffic report: Belles of the ball
- WikiProject report: What happens when a country is no longer a country?
- News and notes: The Wikimedia Conference and Wikimania
- Featured content: When angels and daemons interrupt the vicious and intemperate
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 22 July 2015
- From the editor: Change the world
- News and notes: Wikimanía 2016; Lightbreather ArbCom case
- Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015 report, part 1, the plenaries
- Traffic report: The Nerds, They Are A-Changin'
- WikiProject report: Some more politics
- Featured content: The sleep of reason produces monsters
- Gallery: "One small step..."
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 29 July 2015
- News and notes: BARC de-adminship proposal; Wikimania recordings debate
- Recent research: Wikipedia and collective intelligence; how Wikipedia is tweeted
- In the media: Is Wikipedia a battleground in the culture wars?
- Featured content: Even mammoths get the Blues
- Traffic report: Namaste again, Reddit
Nomination of Formula One video games for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Formula One video games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formula One video games until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tvx1 17:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 August 2015
- Op-ed: Je ne suis pas Google
- News and notes: VisualEditor, endowment, science, and news in brief
- WikiProject report: Meet the boilerplate makers
- Traffic report: Mrityorma amritam gamaya...
- Featured content: Maya, Michigan, Medici, Médée, and Moul n'ga
The Signpost: 12 August 2015
- News and notes: Superprotect, one year later; a contentious RfA
- In the media: Paid editing; traffic drop; Nicki Minaj
- Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015, part 2, a community event
- Traffic report: Fighting from top to bottom
- Featured content: Fused lizards, giant mice, and Scottish demons
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Blog: The Hunt for Tirpitz
The Signpost: 19 August 2015
- Travelogue: Seeing is believing
- Traffic report: Straight Outta Connecticut
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Ultraviolet image of the Cygnus Loop Nebula crop.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 19:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
|
The Signpost: 26 August 2015
- In focus: An increase in active Wikipedia editors
- In the media: Russia temporarily blocks Wikipedia
- News and notes: Re-imagining grants
- Featured content: Out to stud, please call later
- Arbitration report: Reinforcing Arbitration
- Recent research: OpenSym 2015 report
Banksy pic on Bristol
I saw you reverted my edit on Bristol about the Banksy mural/graffiti. Could you join the debate on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bristol/archive1 where User:Nikkimaria is arguing that Freedom of Panorama doesn't apply because it is 2D (a view shared by some others I've consulted).— Rod talk 13:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 September 2015
- Special report: Massive paid editing network unearthed on the English Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flow placed on ice
- Discussion report: WMF's sudden reversal on Wiki Loves Monuments
- Featured content: Brawny
- In the media: Orangemoody sockpuppet case sparks widespread coverage
- Traffic report: You didn't miss much
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 09 September 2015
- Gallery: Being Welsh
- Featured content: Killed by flying debris
- News and notes: The Swedish Wikipedia's controversial two-millionth article
- Traffic report: Mass media production traffic
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 16 September 2015
- Editorial: No access is no answer to closed access
- News and notes: Byrd and notifications leave, but page views stay; was a terror suspect editing Wikipedia?
- In the media: Is there life on Mars?
- Featured content: Why did the emu cross the road?
- Traffic report: Another week
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Bristol P&R
Hi Matt, I'd obviously rather not get in to an edit war but to be completely honest I'm absolutely confused on why you undid the redirect ?,
All of the content here is all at Bristol park and ride so it doesn't make sense to have 2 articles that are pretty much a duplicate of each other?
Anyway thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Davey2010: I agree it doesn't make sense to have duplicate articles, however my reasoning is that they should not be duplicates. The Bristol P&R article, which covers all the city P&Rs, should be expanded with info on the rest of them. There are articles on the Portway P&R, and I think on the Long Ashton one. The Bath Road one should have its own article too. As for your comment that it's an article about a single service number, it's an article about the facility as well as the service. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:34, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- You're right they shouldn't but if we remove the content on the A4 article that's already on the Bristol P&R article you'll then only have a couple of lines left on the A4 article, Unless individual services are notable than most often that not service numbers are put in to one article, I guess some of it could be merged in to Bristol P&R but as it stands it isn't really notable for a standalone article. –Davey2010Talk 18:52, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- So it's a stub, the world will not end because of that. I'm sure the A4 one can be expanded if people desire. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well ofcourse you're more than welcome to revert but I just don't see the point of having 2 identical articles, Anyway Thanks for replying & Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 22:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- So it's a stub, the world will not end because of that. I'm sure the A4 one can be expanded if people desire. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- You're right they shouldn't but if we remove the content on the A4 article that's already on the Bristol P&R article you'll then only have a couple of lines left on the A4 article, Unless individual services are notable than most often that not service numbers are put in to one article, I guess some of it could be merged in to Bristol P&R but as it stands it isn't really notable for a standalone article. –Davey2010Talk 18:52, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 September 2015
- In the media: PETA makes "monkey selfie" a three-way copyright battle; Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Featured content: Inside Duke Humfrey's Library
- WikiProject report: Dancing to the beat of a... wikiproject?
- Traffic report: ¡Viva la Revolución! Kinda.
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Disambiguation link notification for September 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avonmouth (BPRP) railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Women's Army Auxiliary Corps. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
AFD
Hi Matt, Just a heads up I've nominated the A4 Bristol Park & Ride article (here), Seeing as the ping has a mind of its own I thought it was only fair I left a message so I then know you've definitely got a notification!, Anyway thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2015
- Recent research: Wiktionary special; newbies, conflict and tolerance; Is Wikipedia's search function inferior?
- Tech news: Tech news in brief
Your GA nomination of Avonmouth railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Avonmouth railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FallingGravity -- FallingGravity (talk) 08:00, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Referencing stuff
Thanks for the ping re Reference formats on the GA review of Avonmouth railway station - I've taken a look at the article and could only see one other (minor error) which had an extra pp after page=. I have removed it. I think the error generated by having a link in work= is new and I have been removing some where I see them (working on the wp Bristol cleanup listing). If you look at item "25 External link in |<param>=" on Help:CS1 errors it seems to be linked to meta data (I'm not sure how). I just removed the link and left the text in work=. Interestingly links to work=BBC and similar don't seem to generate this error. I have a .js tool which highlights CS1 errors in red (but I can't remember which tool it is).— Rod talk 14:31, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Well it's external links that cause the error, internal ones are still fine. It's all a bit annoying, as I was always of the school that references should link everything possible, given they are all read out of context. Thanks for doing the cleanup on a load of the articles I've written. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:47, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 October 2015
- Op-ed: Walled gardens of corruption
- Traffic report: Reality is for losers
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Arbitration report: Warning: Contains GMOs
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Talk blanked at QI
A section of Talk:QI containing a comment by you has been blanked by (GUtt01 (talk) 01:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC))[1]. I left it as is with an added notice along the lines of WP:CBLANK. This does not seem to be the way these things are done and definitely needs your permission per WP:TPO. If you think what GUtt01 did is ok we can leave it as is, otherwise feel free to revert the discussion back in. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 02:43, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- I understand Bryn's reasons for returning them, but the fact of the matter is that it pertains to articles that have since been deleted. The apology I put up after that section has run its course, but if you feel there is no point keeping in these sections, let me know.GUtt01 (talk) 10:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- I object to any form of talk page blanking. If someone wishes to archive the talk page, that's fine, but the discussion should not simply be blanked. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Patchway railway station
Hi, I was wondering if Patchway railway station was on your "to do" list of local stations? I've just come across it on the Bristol cleanup list as it is totally unreferenced - as you are much more expert on local stations i wondered if you could add any?— Rod talk 08:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Rodw: I expect I could work on Patchway in the next few weeks. I've just completed Pill, though next week's a busy week at work so not likely to have so much free time as this week! I was going to do the other Avonmouth stations next, but I'm waiting on a few new sources to arrive, so sure, Patchway it is! -mattbuck (Talk) 10:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Rodw: that's done now. Apart from a bit of proofreading, it's probably ready for GA. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks it has certainly got more refs then when I looked at it.— Rod talk 17:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Rodw: that's done now. Apart from a bit of proofreading, it's probably ready for GA. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 October 2015
- WikiConference report: US gathering sees speeches from Andrew Lih, AfroCrowd, and the Archivist of the United States
- News and notes: 2015–2016 Q1 fundraising update sparks mailing list debate
- Traffic report: Screens, Sport, Reddit, and Death
- Featured content: A fistful of dollars
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Avonmouth railway station has been nominated for Did You Know
Hello, Mattbuck. Avonmouth railway station, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 00:22, 22 October 2015 (UTC) |
Henbury railway station
Hi again, Do you have a copy of Oakley, Mike (2006). Bristol Railway Stations 1840-2005. Redcliffe. ISBN 978-1-904537-54-0. If so could you look up the page number(s) needed for Henbury railway station?— Rod talk 17:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Rodw: it's in my desk at work, I'll try to remember sometime this week. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Rodw: Henbury is pages 70 and 71. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 October 2015
- Editorial: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
- In the media: "Wikipedia's hostility to women"
- Special report: One year of GamerGate, or how I learned to stop worrying and love bare rule-level consensus
- Featured content: A more balanced week
- Arbitration report: Four ArbCom cases ongoing
- Traffic report: Hiding under the covers of the Internet
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Your GA nomination of Avonmouth railway station
The article Avonmouth railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Avonmouth railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FallingGravity -- FallingGravity (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost's reorganization plan—we need your help
- News and notes: English Wikipedia reaches five million articles
- In the media: The world's Wikipedia gaps; Google and Wikipedia accused of tying Ben Carson to NAMBLA
- Arbitration report: A second attempt at Arbitration enforcement
- Traffic report: Canada, the most popular nation on Earth
- Recent research: Student attitudes towards Wikipedia; Jesus, Napoleon and Obama top "Wikipedia social network"; featured article editing patterns in 12 languages
- Featured content: Birds, turtles, and other things
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Community letter: Five million articles
Disambiguation link notification for November 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clifton Bridge railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cumberland Basin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 November 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation finances; Superprotect is gone
- In the media: Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov: propaganda myth or history?
- Traffic report: Death, the Dead, and Spectres are abroad
- Featured content: Christianity, music, and cricket
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
DYK for Avonmouth railway station
On 8 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Avonmouth railway station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Avonmouth railway station (pictured) was developed from a halt for the construction workers of the Avonmouth Docks, built in 1868? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Avonmouth railway station. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Stapleton Road railway station & other local articles railway articles showing errors
Hi again, I'm looking again at the Bristol cleanup listing and wondered if you could help with some local stations:
- On Stapleton Road railway station ref 15 a & b, "Train Times from Stapleton Road (SRD)" (PDF). Kadfire Ltd. 31 December 2012 to 10 February 2013". Retrieved 9 October 2013. is showing two errors - date value and dead link. Is that ref vital for the article & is any other source available.
- On Bristol Temple Meads railway station an update banner has been added to passenger numbers
Any help you could offer would be appreciated.— Rod talk 17:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Rodw: Done -mattbuck (Talk) 22:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help.— Rod talk 16:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 November 2015
- Arbitration report: Elections, redirections, and a resignation from the Committee
- Discussion report: Compromise of two administrator accounts prompts security review
- Featured content: Texas, film, and cycling
- In the media: Sanger on Wikipedia; Silver on Vox; lawyers on monkeys
- Traffic report: Doodles of popularity
- Gallery: Paris
Reference errors on 19 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Ashton Gate railway station page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 November 2015
- Special report: ArbCom election—candidates’ opinions analysed
- In the media: Icelandic milestone; apolitical editing
- Discussion report: BASC disbanded; other developments in the discussion world
- Arbitration report: Ban Appeals Subcommittee goes up in smoke; 21 candidates running
- Featured content: Fantasia on a Theme by Jimbo Wales
- Traffic report: Darkness and light
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 November 2015
- News and notes: Fundraising update; FDC recommendations
- Featured content: Caves and stuff
- Traffic report: J'en ai ras le bol
- Arbitration report: Third Palestine-Israel case closes; Voting begins
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
MetroWest (Bristol), Proposed transport developments in Bristol, Transport in Bristol, Great Western Main Line etc
Can I ask for help from your specialised knowledge/sources again?
- On MetroWest (Bristol) is a citation needed tag for passengers being left on stations.
- There is an "outdated" banner on Proposed transport developments in Bristol and dead links & citation needed tags on Transport in Bristol.
- Great Western Main Line has citation nedded tags and one whole section with no references
- Avonmouth Light Railway has tags asking for fuller references
- Wessex Main Line says references needed as does South Wales Main Line
- St Philip's Marsh depot has an uncited section
If you were able to help with any of them that would be great.— Rod talk 17:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Metrowest - might be able to help, can't remember any obvious examples of it though
- Proposed transport developments sounds like a random umbrella article which probably has no business existing
- GWML... may be able to help, I'll take a look.
- I have no idea about this one - I know it existed because it was on a map, but never found any textual references to it
- Might be able to help with SWML, but Wessex may be outside my area of expertise. I'll see.
- I'll take a look.
- -mattbuck (Talk) 20:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 December 2015
- Op-ed: Whither Wikidata?
- Traffic report: Jonesing for episodes
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Aborted GA review for Finchley Central tube station
Matt,
Apologies for dropping off the face of the earth during the GA review of Finchley Central tube station. I've had a massive workload on in the real world that has consumed all of my free time. When things quieten down, I will come back to the article, review any outstanding comments and renominate it. Thanks for your input.--DavidCane (talk) 09:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
I have PR'ed the article. Thought I'd let you know here, as it's been a while since it was put up for review. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 17:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- White Arabian Filly, thanks very much, I look forward to reading your comments. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 December 2015
- News and notes: ArbCom election results announced
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 winners
- Traffic report: So do you laugh, or does it cry?
- Featured content: Sports, ships, arts... and some other things
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
station articles
- Don't take things personally, if someone reverts you it's probably because they simply thought the previous version was better. The way wikipedia works is WP:BRD - make a Bold edit, it gets Reverted, you go to the talk page and Discuss it. Your change to Avonmouth railway station wasn't an improvement to the article as it made the routebox harder to understand. It's exactly this sort of situtation templates like {{rail line one to three}} was designed for. That said, some people do prefer to use the vanilla template, but with the different options on different lines, eg:
Terminus
or
Somewhere
- Let me know if you need any help with editing station articles, I've been slowly working on improving Bristol area station articles and am always happy to help others apply the same logic. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I could do with some help with this:
Preceding station | National Rail | Following station | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Great Western Railway South Wales Main Line Saturday only |
The problem is when it says Great Western Railway it doesn't appear like it does when it says First Great Western:
Preceding station | National Rail | Following station | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
First Great Western South Wales Main Line Saturday only |
Do you know how to get round this problem? Your help would be much appreciated.-Merlinhst7 (talk) 22:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Merlinhst7: I'll be honest, I don't know my way around {{s-rail-national}}, I tend to stick to the many {{rail line}} templates as they're fully customisable. The issue will be somewhere in the coding of the template's switch calls on the s-rail template itself, but I'm unsure where exactly. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:02, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 December 2015
- In the media: Wales in China; #Edit2015
- Arbitration report: GMO case decided
- Featured content: An unusually slow week
- WikiProject report: Women in Red—using teamwork and partnerships to elevate online and offline collaborations
- Traffic report: A feast of Spam
MacDermot
Hi, re this edit - what's wrong with MacDermot? --Redrose64 (talk) 21:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: I'm sure it's a lovely book, but it's not one I own and so I can't get a pagenumber from it. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- I do own it. The gauge conversions are detailed in Appendix I, between pages 596 and 629. The conversions of 1873 (Midland Junction - North Somerset Junction, 36 chains, broad gauge to mixed on 4 August; South Wales Junction - New Passage Pier, 11 miles 37 chains, broad gauge to standard on 7-9 August) are listed on p. 599 and described on p. 66. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 December 2015
- News and notes: WMF Board dismisses community-elected trustee
- Arbitration report: Second Arbitration Enforcement case concludes as another case is suspended
- Featured content: The post-Christmas edition
- Traffic report: The Force we expected
- Year in review: The top ten Wikipedia stories of 2015
- In the media: Wikipedia plagued by a "Basket of Deception"
- Gallery: It's that time of year again
Patchway
Hi, any reason you're trying for FA when the GA review hasn't begun yet? --Redrose64 (talk) 11:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Frak, my bad. I've nominated the page for deletion - Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Patchway railway station/archive1 -mattbuck (Talk) 11:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- WP:G6 wasn't applicable, but WP:G7 was, so I deleted it as if you had added a
{{db-self}}
. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)- Wikipedia speedy numbers always confuse me. Commons is so much easier. "It's a copyvio!" Thanks very much. I'll reconsider my article choice, perhaps Avonmouth. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:37, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- WP:G6 wasn't applicable, but WP:G7 was, so I deleted it as if you had added a
The Signpost: 06 January 2016
- News and notes: The WMF's age of discontent
- In the media: Impenetrable science; Jimmy Wales back in the UAE
- Arbitration report: Catflap08 and Hijiri88 case been decided
- Featured content: Featured menagerie
- WikiProject report: Try-ing to become informed - WikiProject Rugby League
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 13 January 2016
- Community view: Battle for the soul of the WMF
- Editorial: We need a culture of verification
- In focus: The Crisis at New Montgomery Street
- Op-ed: Transparency
- Traffic report: Pattern recognition: Third annual Traffic Report
- Special report: Wikipedia community celebrates Public Domain Day 2016
- News and notes: Community objections to new Board trustee
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Arbitration report: Interview: outgoing and incumbent arbitrators 2016
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Heart of Wessex Line
Hi again, I don't know if the Heart of Wessex Line falls within your area of interest? If so... it has a banner saying that it needs inline citations and, as you know the sources much better than I do, whether you could add some?— Rod talk 20:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Rod. I'm afraid I've been really busy recently so haven't had much chance to do wikiwork. The Heart of Wessex Line I feel may be an invention of sorts, I'll ask at WT:UKRAIL. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:10, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 January 2016
- News and notes: Vote of no confidence; WMF trustee speaks out
- In the media: 15th anniversary news round-up
- Traffic report: Danse Macabre
- Featured content: This week's featured content
The Signpost: 27 January 2016
- News and notes: Geshuri steps down from the Board
- In the media: Media coverage of the Arnnon Geshuri no-confidence vote
- Recent research: Bursty edits; how politics beat religion but then lost to sports; notability as a glass ceiling
- Traffic report: Death and taxes
- Featured content: This week's featured content
The Signpost: 03 February 2016
- From the editors: Help wanted
- Special report: Board chair and new trustee speak with the Signpost
- Arbitration report: Catching up on arbitration
- Traffic report: Bowled
- Featured content: This week's featured content
The Signpost: 10 February 2016
- News and notes: Another WMF departure
- In the media: Jeb Bush swings at Wikipedia and connects
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: A river of revilement
The Signpost: 17 February 2016
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: Super Bowling
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 24 February 2016
- Special report: WMF in limbo as decision on Tretikov nears
- Op-ed: Backward the Foundation
- Traffic report: Of Dead Pools and Dead Judges
- Arbitration report: Arbitration motion regarding CheckUser & Oversight inactivity
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 02 March 2016
- News and notes: Tretikov resigns, WMF in transition
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: Brawling
Your GA nomination of Avonmouth (BPRP) railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Avonmouth (BPRP) railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 17:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 March 2016
- News and notes: Katherine Maher named interim head of WMF; Wales email re-sparks Heilman controversy; draft WMF strategy posted
- Technology report: Wikimedia wikis will temporarily go into read-only mode on several occasions in the coming weeks
- WikiCup report: First round of the WikiCup finishes
- Traffic report: All business like show business
Your GA nomination of Avonmouth (BPRP) railway station
The article Avonmouth (BPRP) railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Avonmouth (BPRP) railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 14:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 March 2016
- News and notes: Wikipedia Zero: Orange mobile partnership in Africa ends; the evolution of privacy loss in Wikipedia
- In the media: Wales at SXSW; lawsuit over Wikipedia PR editing
- Discussion report: Is an interim WMF executive director inherently notable?
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Technology report: Watchlists, watchlists, watchlists!
- Traffic report: Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States
- Wikipedia Weekly: Podcast #119: The Foundation and the departure of Lila Tretikov
Your GA nomination of Pill railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pill railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 23:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
British Rail and copyright
Do you know if works by British Rail are subject to Crown copyright? That is, should File:The Flying Scotsman (train) centenary poster.jpg be retagged as {{PD-UKGov}}? If not, then it is necessary to remove the image from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains per WP:NFCC#9. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, but you could ask at WT:UKRAIL. On the grounds that the image is currently fair use I have removed it. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 March 2016
- News and notes: Lila Tretikov a Young Global Leader; Wikipediocracy blog post sparks indefinite blocks
- In the media: Angolan file sharers cause trouble for Wikipedia Zero; the 3D printer edit war; a culture based on change and turmoil
- Traffic report: Be weary on the Ides of March
- Editorial: "God damn it, you've got to be kind."
- Featured content: Watch out! A slave trader, a live mascot and a crested serpent awaits!
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel article 3 case amended
- Wikipedia Weekly: Podcast #120: Status of Wikimania 2016
Your GA nomination of Patchway railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Patchway railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 06:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Clifton Bridge railway station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clifton Bridge railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 06:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pill railway station
The article Pill railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pill railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Bathampton railway station
Hi, I know it is a bit outside your normal area of station interest but do you have any sources about Bathampton railway station? It has recently been tagged as unsourced & you know a lot more about these topics than I do.— Rod talk 19:04, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oakley's Somerset Railway Stations ought to cover it, if I get a chance at work tomorrow I'll have a look. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Patchway railway station
The article Patchway railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Patchway railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 06:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 April 2016
- News and notes: Trump/Wales 2016
- WikiProject report: Why should the Devil have all the good music? An interview with WikiProject Christian music
- Traffic report: Donald v Daredevil
- Featured content: A slow, slow week
- Technology report: Browse Wikipedia in safety? Use Telnet!
- Recent research: "Employing Wikipedia for good not evil" in education; using eyetracking to find out how readers read articles
- Wikipedia Weekly: Podcast #121: How April Fools went down
Your GA nomination of Clifton Bridge railway station
The article Clifton Bridge railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Clifton Bridge railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 07:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 April 2016
- News and notes: Denny Vrandečić resigns from Wikimedia Foundation board
- In the media: Wikimedia Sweden loses copyright case; Tex Watson; AI assistants; David Jolly biography
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: A welcome return to pop culture and death
- Arbitration report: The first case of 2016—Wikicology
- Gallery: A history lesson
The Signpost: 24 April 2016
- Special report: Update on EranBot, our new copyright violation detection bot
- Traffic report: Two for the price of one
- Featured content: The double-sized edition
- Arbitration report: Amendments made to the Race and intelligence case
The Signpost: 2 May 2016
- In the media: Wikipedia Zero piracy in Bangladesh; bureaucracy; chilling effects; too few cooks; translation gaps
- Traffic report: Purple
- Featured content: The best ... from the past two weeks
The Signpost: 17 May 2016
- Op-ed: Swiss chapter in turmoil
- In the media: Wikimedia's Dario Taraborelli quoted on Google's Knowledge Graph in The Washington Post
- Featured content: Two weeks for the prize of one
- Traffic report: Oh behave, Beyhive / Underdogs
- Arbitration report: "Wikicology" ends in site ban; evidence and workshop phases concluded for "Gamaliel and others"
- Wikicup: That's it for WikiCup Round 2!
The Signpost: 28 May 2016
- News and notes: Upcoming Wikimedia conferences in the US and India; May Metrics and Activities Meeting
- Special report: Compensation paid to Sue Gardner increased by almost 50 percent after she stepped down as executive director
- Featured content: Eight articles, three lists and five pictures
- Op-ed: Journey of a Wikipedian
- Arbitration report: Gamaliel resigns from the arbitration committee
- Recent research: English as Wikipedia's Lingua Franca; deletion rationales; schizophrenia controversies
- Traffic report: Splitting (musical) airs / Slow Ride
The Signpost: 05 June 2016
- News and notes: WMF cuts budget for 2016-17 as scope tightens
- Featured content: Overwhelmed ... by pictures
- Traffic report: Pop goes the culture, again.
- Arbitration report: ArbCom case "Gamaliel and others" concludes
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Video Games
The Signpost: 15 June 2016
- News and notes: Clarifications on status and compensation of outgoing executive directors Sue Gardner and Lila Tretikov
- Special report: Wikiversity Journal—A new user group
- Featured content: From the crème de la crème
- In the media: Biography disputes; Craig Newmark donation; PR editing
- Traffic report: Another one with sports; Knockout, brief candle
The Signpost: 04 July 2016
- News and notes: Board unanimously appoints Katherine Maher as new WMF executive director; Wikimedia lawsuits in France and Germany
- Op-ed: Two policies in conflict?
- In the media: Terrorism database cites Wikipedia as a source
- Featured content: Triple fun of featured content
- Traffic report: Goalposts; Oy vexit