User talk:Marty2Hotty

Anne Hathaway

There was a proposal brought up and discussed in 2010 to basically do exactly what you just did and it was rejected. Personally, I don't care one way or another, however if you feel strongly about the page move, I would suggest proposing it again rather than making the changes yourself. You'll only upset people otherwise. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 12:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Oh I didn't realize that. I think it should be changed to redirect to the actress because that would naturally be the most searched subject in current times. Marty2Hotty (talk) 22:36, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- I'm just checking my talk page and realized that Anne Hathaway now goes to the actress as I wanted. Basically, it used to go to the disambiguation page. I was like, who else would someone searching "Anne Hathaway" look for. Interesting :) Marty2Hotty (talk) 11:31, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marty2Hotty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm Marty2Hotty and am using a computer to inquire as to why I'm blocked. A user called MuZemike banned me for reasons unknown to me. The reason is I am apparently linked to a Bigsean0300. There are no entry links and I have no idea who it is which leads me to think it is an IP link. I have edited articles from my public library, which leads me to think this may be an association. The moderator blocked my email, and cannot even edit my own talk page. I've had this account for years and see no reason why I should be linked to this bigsean0300. Please reverse this ban. I haven't created any new accounts and submitted an appeal through the form. The form stated that it would be better to add this tag on, which is why I'm doing so. Thanks in advance.

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed sock. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:17, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that, after looking at some information that I have received privately, I have reason to believe that this is not a sock puppet of a banned user and has unblocked as a result. This looks like the result of a likely false positive combined with some joe jobbing going on. My apologies for the inconvenience and my error, and I assure that it was not deliberate. --MuZemike 07:39, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks MuZemike. When I researched the reason as to why I was blocked, I looked up the "confirmed sockpuppets" section of Bigsean0300:

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Bigsean0300

If you scroll down to the "M" section:

M User:Marty2Hotty User:Marty2snotty User:Marty2snottybigsean0300 User:Max Payne1

You will see that there was an account called "Marty2snottybigsean0300", which led to the admin to action Marty2snotty, and it seems as though my account "Marty2Hotty" was taken down for only having only a similar username, without any other links. I have had this account for 3 1/2 years. I hope that in the future, the evidence can be cited. At the very least, allow a member to edit their own talk page. I had difficulty trying to make contact with admins! Marty2Hotty (talk) 23:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom unblock appeal

This user has appealed their block to the Arbitration Committee. After running a check on the account the Committee have declined the unblock request. There is sufficient evidence to link the account to Bigsean0300.

For the Arbitration Committee. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 09:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- The initial block was blocked in error. I sent a "ticket" before emailing the administrator who blocked me. After being unblocked, I heard back from the arbitration committee and was blocked again. This is the only account I have ever had. Marty2Hotty (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We are continuing to look into the matter, sorry for any inconvenience. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 10:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks for looking into it. I am happy I have a chance to edit my talk page. I wasn't allowed to the first time I was blocked. It was pretty crazy, as I had no idea how I was linked. I then had to investigate myself and it really does seem that it was similar username. I understand the policies needed to prevent spam/abuse on Wikipedia, but by doing so, you're going to take down some innocent accounts at the same time. Again, I've had this account for 3 1/2 years and haven't had any other. It would be nice to have this account active again, because I enjoy editing wikipedia pages from time to time to help out. Thanks again - 20:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

After consultation with the original blocking (and unblocking) admin, the Arbitration Committee have agreed to unblock this account. The banned user Bigsean0300 and Marty2Hotty had technical similarities and it appears Bigsean0300 took advantage of that to create two new sock accounts making it appear as though Marty2Hotty was involved. Further technical and behavioural evidence have cleared this account. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 20:56, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Loose Change (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill O'Reilly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This has now been fixed with a direct link to the actual public figure in question. Marty2Hotty (talk) 12:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Loose Change

I have reverted all your moves, redirections and copy & pasting in the Loose Change, Loose Change (disambiguation) and Loose Change (old disambiguation). You should never copy the text from one article and paste it into a different article. The process for moving articles is at WP:RM. GB fan 15:35, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to God Is Dead? may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

directed by [[Peter Joseph]], director of the ''Zeitgeist'' film series.<ref name="godisdeadvideo">{{cite news | url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhhOU5FUPBE| title=Black Sabbath - God Is Dead? |
OhhOU5FUPBE| title=Black Sabbath - God Is Dead? | accessdate=June 11, 2013| author=[{Black Sabbath]]| date=June 10, 2013| publisher=[[VEVO]]}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irvine Welsh's Ecstasy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the links. Thanks. Marty2Hotty (talk) 11:27, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ecstasyost.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ecstasyost.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ecstasysoundtrack3.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ecstasysoundtrack3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:19, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beautiful World Ecstasy Remixes cover art.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beautiful World Ecstasy Remixes cover art.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:19, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bateman

Hi. I reverted your edition. I explain: Wikipedia uses the common name, a policy about names. The name of the article like that is the common name, not the current name. For example, American Rapper Snoop Dogg changed his name to Snoop Lion, but the article name stills Dogg because he spent years under that name. Mr. Hutter, the same. He appeared in WWE as Bateman for two years, so now, Bateman is the common name. He uses EC3 for one, two months. We can't say "EC3 is the name that he will use forward" because we can't be sure. If tomorrow Hutter died, changed his name or is fired, the common name will be Bateman. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bateman is not his "common" name. Just because he used it in WWE, doesn't mean it should be his permanent ring name. It's not like Hulk Hogan vs Hollywood Hogan (where Hulk would win). Thanks for your explanation but I disagree, because Bateman was on NXT and a few shows in WWE, but that doesn't make it permanent. Marty2Hotty (talk) 20:51, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm reviewing my own talk page. I'm glad that his article is now Ethan Carter III as I wanted it to be. But at the time of the edit (December 2013), his character was new. Marty2Hotty (talk) 05:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly notice

Hi! I notice you're quite new here? Welcome! I am too..sort of..but have been doing loads of editing so have lots of experience :) Just wanted to tell you that I reverted your change on Kristin kreuk's page. If you can provide a source/link to a website that proves that they have been living together or been with eachother since 2004, then you can change it back to 2004 and I'll leave it be. It's just that the personal life section says "partner since 2011" and so having 2004 in the infobox would contradict that.

Cheers

Miss.Indecisive (talk) 07:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've been editing articles here and there for like 4 years. Welcome to Wikipedia I guess. But there was an article where she said that she was with him for eight years. The article has been changed so much since a couple of years ago that for me to find it, I'd have to go back a few years, but I'm too lazy to do that and couldn't really care less. Accurately, they met on 2004 mini-series "Earthsea" (where they were cast together) and have been together since. I actually met her a few years ago too :) - Marty2Hotty (talk) 10:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, my bad! Thought you were new haha :D Lucky you!! So i guess we'll just leave it at 2011 for now, and if you do find it, source it and change it to "2004-present". Then again, although they met at that time, we do have to consider whether they started living together in 2004 as well..which is the apparent "criteria" for the partner section. :)

Miss.Indecisive (talk) 06:46, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Candy Crush Saga

They release new levels every 2 weeks so you don't really need to keep updating it every time. Just update it monthly.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 17:08, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.. I think it's okay anyway to update. It only takes a second. Marty2Hotty (talk) 06:32, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

you really don't have to keep updating the page like this every two weeks.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:45, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

People update ratings all the time. I don't think it's a big deal to. Marty2Hotty (talk) 08:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ed Asner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Controlled demolition. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- fixed. Marty2Hotty (talk) 04:34, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Cherry Bomb (wrestler) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chrono album

Thank you very much for adding the new album to the "music of Chrono Trigger/Chrono Cross" pages, especially the tracklist- it's a big help to actually get a section put in for both pages, doubly so for so soon after the album was released. --Pres N 03:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- Thank you so much. Usually when someone posts something on my talk page, it's usually to complain about something I did wrong, so I appreciate it, lol. The information was taken from vgmdb.net. I was also responsible for adding the 2009 3 CD album before as well Marty2Hotty (talk) 22:43, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Stubblebine

Please don't blank material because you don't like it. It's sourced, including to an interview with him. If you think the sources fail WP:RS, take it up on the article's talk page. I note that you left most of the stuff about him walking through walls in the article, which made your edit pretty pointless so far as I can see. Doug Weller (talk) 19:09, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page of Albert Stubblebine is merely an attempt to ruin his good name due to the fact he questioned the 9/11 attacks. Too bad it does not work for visitors like myself. He does not talk about walking through walls in any of his interviews. It was a Daily Mail article used to defame him. There needs to be credible sources. I am not going to fight the people that want to defame him. Marty2Hotty (talk) 21:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Man of Constant Sorrow

Just a note to say that some of the minor versions you added have been deleted. This is mainly because of the restriction placed by WP:COVERSONG, therefore if you wish to add a song, do give a source that indicate its notability, e.g. it has been discussed in a book or other reliable sources in a non-trivial way, and links to YouTube and Twitter could not establish such notability. Hzh (talk) 14:55, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I didn't even add those versions. Someone else did and there was a note asking for a source. So, I just found links to YouTube and linked them. They do appear to be good sources because they were performed by artists that have a Wikipedia article. Marty2Hotty (talk) 08:02, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Loose Change move

I have reverted your move of Loose Change to Loose Change (films). First, the primary name should never be a redirect, so either we need to do a couple of moves or leave things alone. Next, the name you moved the disambiguation page was not appropriate. There are items on Loose Change that are not films. If you think a page move needs to happen you will need to start a discussion, see WP:RM for more information. -- GB fan 21:00, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request a move that "Loose Change" be the name of the actual article and a link to disambiguation be noted above. Most people searching this will be searching the film series. Marty2Hotty (talk) 21:29, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Marty2Hotty. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Marty2Hotty. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Angela Hill

Hi. Your edit to Angela Hill, as we has been reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. I know you don't edit here that often, but since you've accumulated over 4,000 edits since you began editing here in 2008, you should know by now that Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you have sources for the material you wish to add to the article, please cite them, and do not add that material without them. Thanks. 16:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Prankstar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prankstar, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prankstar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kamaru Usman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thiago Alves. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sean O'Malley

Hi. In spite of it clearly being in line with the given source, you changed O'Malley's nickname from right to wrong. We always go by Sherdog for nicknames.

https://www.sherdog.com/fighter/Sean-OMalley-135099

Sometimes (on rare occasions) we use ESPN when there is a dispute.

https://www.espn.co.uk/mma/fighter/_/id/4205093/sean-omalley

While it's not independent and therefore less than ideal, people sometimes (although not for infobox nicknames) refer to the UFC site.

https://www.ufc.com/athlete/sean-omalley

Again, while this wouldn't pass as a reason to include in the infobox, you could review a green IRS to corroborate. Like this.

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/ufc/omalley-sterling-ufc-292-results-b2396194.html

I'm sure you have noticed a pattern.

Thanks. NEDOCHAN (talk) 10:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sean's nickname on UFC and ESPN is now back to "Suga" and not "Sugar". What do you think now? Marty2Hotty (talk) 04:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 in Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clearwater.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Strickland

I was wondering if you could change Sean Strickland’s title from American Mix martial artist to American professional mix martial artist since the majority of other fighters have that thanks. NorixNGU (talk) 19:45, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Marty2Hotty (talk) 05:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does Diego lopes have Mexican citizenship? NorixNGU (talk) 18:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no idea, but if there is a source, you can discuss it on his talk page, not mine. Marty2Hotty (talk) 21:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it thanks NorixNGU (talk) 22:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - MMA Barnstar for you

		The MMA Barnstar
		I, Cassiopeia, hereby award Marty2Hotty the The MMA Barnstar for their valued contributions to WikiProject MMA. Awarded MMA Barnstar

Cassiopeia talk 00:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Conor McGregor, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 04:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i was going to add the source. It was announced a minute ago. Why did you write that I "continue" to add. Marty2Hotty (talk) 04:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://twitter.com/SandhuMMA/status/1784432795021979900 This is the announcement that was made. The source was going to be added. Marty2Hotty (talk) 04:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One shouldn't add material before one has the source. Also, there is no point in doing announcements: we're not a celeb gossip website; we do facts. Finally, please cite proper secondary sources, not Twitter. Drmies (talk) 04:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the source is forthcoming within minutes. The announcement was made by the BKFC owner on BKFC channel. The source will be posted literally in minutes, so I am going to revert your edit and add the source. Is that okay? Marty2Hotty (talk) 04:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a reliable secondary source? Or is it someone's tweet? Drmies (talk) 04:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source. It will be on mmajunkie, mmafighting, etc. Fine? Marty2Hotty (talk) 04:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.mmafighting.com/2024/4/28/24143313/conor-mcgregor-mcgregor-sports-and-entertainment-becomes-part-owner-of-bkfc boom Marty2Hotty (talk) 04:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I wouldn't call that independent media, and you put it in the edit summary, not the article. Drmies (talk) 04:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

artcle now.. and it IS independent media. MMA Fighting is the biggest media outlet for MMA. MMA Junkie is second. Are you not familiar with them? The other sites are reporting it now too. I put it in the summary to show the source so that I could put it in the article. Marty2Hotty (talk) 04:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

added two major sources to the news. Sorry for posting the news minutes before the news was reported by MMAJunkie (USAToday) and MMAFighting. The other sites are going to report it within the next ten minutes too. Marty2Hotty (talk) 04:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and the last major one: https://cagesidepress.com/2024/04/28/conor-mcgregor-announces-ownership-stake-in-bkfc/ Marty2Hotty (talk) 04:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://mmajunkie.usatoday.com/2024/04/conor-mcgregor-bkfc-owner-announcement-video-knucklemania Here is MMA Junkie's Marty2Hotty (talk) 04:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

C Messages

=== UFC on ESPN: Cannonier vs. Imavov - Fight card in vertical format ===

Hi Marty2 Hotty, good day. Pls note that the fight card is always in vertical format and not horizontal as per your edit - see here - [1]. Thank you and enjoy UFC on ESPN 57 tomorrow. Cassiopeia talk 00:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. That was not my edit. The only edit I made on that page was the catchweight bout change. Please message the one who originally made the veritical format as you said. Marty2Hotty (talk) 11:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it looks like when I edited the table (adding Catchweight) with the visual editor, it changed the formatting. I will use source if I have to change it. Thanks. Marty2Hotty (talk) 11:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have never had the problem using Visual editor to add source; however, we would not know as may be there is a rare technical issue or there was another editor editor the formatting at the same time you add the source and when both editors save their edits, the system lumped that in one edit as it happened to me before. Anyway, I hope you enjoy the fights today. Good night. Cassiopeia talk 05:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only added "Catchweight 116.5lb" to one bout and it changed the entire for the whole table, so I need to be careful. I had to load the table and it affected everything for some reason. I think for those tables, it is necessary to only use source editing. Marty2Hotty (talk) 07:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use source edit for table is the save bet. Thank you anyway. Cassiopeia talk 07:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

adding and moving fighter in list of current ufc fighters

@HeinzMaster: Hi Marty2 Hotty and loop in HeinzMaster, each week, editor Heinz will move the fighters in certain divisions if they about to fight in diff division as per when they had debuted (date) prior the fight date and also move the fighter from "signing" section to "debuted fighters" division section accordingly. Leave it to Heinz to do the editing pls as I believe he have a database of when the fighters UFC debuted dates to slot in the right place of the division listed in the article (I used to have the fighters' UFC debuted dates store on excel in my computer. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 06:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

okay but did I make a mistake for those moves? I moved Jesse Butler and Punahele Soriano. I searched for debut dates of them and those in the division to put in the correct slot. Marty2Hotty (talk) 07:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HeinzMaster: Hi Marty2 Hotty, I dont know if the moves were correct or not as I no longer update the debuted dates since Heinz took over the tasks I havent updated on my UFC debuted dates spread sheets. Just let Heinz help on the task, for he know the in and out on this one. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 07:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will let him know. The moves were correct, by the way. Marty2Hotty (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 08:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fighters' page fight event to new names

Hi Marty2Hotty, I saw you edited some of the fighters' page for the new event name. Just wonder have you done all the fighters pages and List of current UFC fighters from UFC on ESPN 58 onwards? If not let me know which one have not been done so I will do them. Just want to be sure all are updated. Since I am here, just to let you know that the norm is that if a certain editors do certain edits in regular basic, we usually let him to the work and not take over the edits, if so then only 1 or 2 editors would be needed and not a collaboration work and sooner or later, the experienced editors just left Wikipedia as their interest only in mma specific. I understand you enjoy to contribute but do consider my point. If an editor no longer have time or not longer interest on the edits which they usually do, then we take over the work. There is only a handful of us that is really active and experienced and many mma editors come and go, so just do make sure the handful always around since they have the knowledge and experience and able to welcome, educate, support and do constructive talk page disagreement settlement. That is the reason why I ask you to let Heizn to do the moving fighters and update the fighter in original country and division and same here I will always remain work on the update bouts and results on the page. If I am away for certain reasons and unable to update, Heinz will step in without I need to let him know as we work for awhile to understand the pattern of our edits. I hope you could understand and thank you for your contribution. Let me if if there is a "sector" of edit you want to do in List of current UFC fighters such as update the rankings of each week. I will welcome that if so. Let me know and thank you. (This is the same reasons, there is certain editors moved the announced bouts to fight card and update the results after fights which we all let the do the work. Cassiopeia talk 06:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I updated all the ones that had the event name changed to my knowledge from the fighters' pages. I do not know when Fight Night event names change. It depends on when a new UFC event is added. When that happens, I guess the same can apply. Moving fighters to the appropriate section after debut is not a big problem, but I will let Heinz know. It looks like the country and number of fighters need to be updated. The "List of Current Fighters" page was good but I cleaned it up a little. The editors who move the announced bouts to the fight card do a good job too.

I do enjoy editing. It is Wikipedia. I think people are free to edit. If it is your task to update a certain part, you can do so, but I guess if I am available, I can do it too if I am available. If I do it and make a mistake, you can always double check as you do, and I can double check others'. Marty2Hotty (talk) 13:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you find out about the names of "ESPN" or "Vegas". I do not know where they are officially listed. Marty2Hotty (talk) 13:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for your updates on the fighters' and list of current UFC fighters articles of the event name changed. I understand you enjoying editing Wikipedia and you are free to edits whatever pages you like. I mentioned to you to let other editors to edits just so that we dont drive the experienced editors away since they have nothing to edit in MMA related pages since you have updated them all, and eventually they will leave Wikipedia for I have seen it many times. It is always good to have experienced editor around so we can educate and welcome new editors. I used to create all the fighters' pages, updated all the announced bouts, fight results, bonuses, championship, rankings and all other related article with only one or 2 other editors involved and it was a lot of work. I educated a few editors later and they joined to help the editing and Heinz came along and he started to create fighters' articles and other came to update the fight card and announced bout and that was the time you came. Since then some experienced editor left because they have nothing to update since the new editors have done all the work. So what I am saying is that, let some of the work be updated by other editors so they also can contribute. If they dont do the work anymore for whatever reasons, then we pick up the work up. So if possible, leave some editing on certain sector for other editors to update and not do all the updating yourself alone even you are available/free to do it so we can keep experienced editors around.

I am glad you clean up the pages, pls do them as you see fit.

The UFC event naming started long time ago. Since there is no name announced by UFC for they just announced "UFC Fight Night on xx month yy date". So the media, started by MMA Junkie, name the Fight Night by number on they article so they can keep track of the events and Sherdog database used it as the fight event name. Then in recent years, not sure which media started to name event in APEX (during Covid) Vegas XX event name and that is how is was started and one editor add that in the article. Here in Wikipedia, the name was used as UFC Fight Night XXX and then also use the TV channel that broadcast the event. It is a long standing how the names are created here in Wikipedia. Once we know which event is broadcasted ESPN or ESPN+ or ABC then we will change the names according and redirect the previous to the articles with the new name. It is a process of moving the articles so the history log remain in the article with the new names. Cassiopeia talk 04:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your explanation on the names.i guess they are not official names by the ufc but once you find out the channel, the name is changed? Do you wait for a source to announce what network it will air on.

Why was last week's one only ufc on espn and not "ufc fight night xxx". Which source do you use to name the page.

When can they be both? We follow mmajunkie? Marty2Hotty (talk) 06:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you for explaining. I don't really update the announced bouts to main card. I think to create all the pages, move, do all the bouts, it's a lot of work. I can do them when I watch the events and I usually watch them. I think heinz still works on other stuff too.

I don't think I want it to be a job that I'm not paid for but I want to update when I'm free and it's enjoyable. I don't know exactly what heinz does but I'm sure he does a great job. I think he updates other company ones.

I usually keep track of the UFC records but recently the current fighters.

I am not sure how long I'll do this for though. I don't want them to leave but they can always check for errors like everyone else does. Marty2Hotty (talk) 06:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty crazy that you created all the pages and did everything before Marty2Hotty (talk) 06:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is good now that there are about a dozen of us who are regular editors to help up on editing and updates. Back some 6-7 years ago, there was only a few of us and so many notable fighters were left without a page and list of current UFC was hardly edits and I expanded the fighters double the info today. Heinze used to update UFC announced, cancelled bouts and updated UFC fighters pages and other things. Since some of you started to be regular editors and understand the norms and some editing guidelines, nowsaday he just updates the UFC current fighter list, moving the fighters to different divisions, updated the debuted fighter countries of origin, released fighters and suspended fighters. He also updated former UFC fighters who fights in different promotions as I didnt have the time to do that. As for the fight event name - we also create the events name with UFC Fight Night XXX except for PPV events. We will change the name when the fight event name change in UFC.com event page when the main event is set. We then will change the event name again when Sherdog updated if the UFC Fight Night is aired in ABC or ESPN or ESPN+. If the event is aired in ESPN+ then that is considered UFC Fight Night XXX event. If the event is aired on ESPN or ABC channel then we will change the event name to UFC on ESPN XX or UFC on ABC XX (Note for all fight night event in regardless on ESPN, ESPN

Disappoiting

You said you were still confused so I explained and I included other editors so they may know the info. I have provided many info, support and educate you with links since you started editing and you stated that I harassed you. Disappointing. Cassiopeia talk 03:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me space. I do not want to edit anymore. Marty2Hotty (talk) 03:03, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikihounding Please review the policy when dealing with other editors. Thank you. I'm out. Marty2Hotty (talk) 03:03, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Hounding on Wikipedia (or "wikihounding") is the singling out of one or more editors, joining discussions on multiple pages or topics they may edit or multiple debates where they contribute, to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work. This is with an apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance, or distress to the other editor. Hounding usually involves following the target from place to place on Wikipedia.

Many users track other users' edits, although usually for collegial or administrative purposes. This should always be done with care, and with good cause, to avoid raising the suspicion that an editor's contributions are being followed to cause them distress, or out of revenge for a perceived slight."

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikihounding Marty2Hotty (talk) 03:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

L Marty2 Hotty, pls read the Keys/Note on List of current UFC fighters section: We use Sherdog info as UFC is considered not independent nor reliable source (UFC is a promoter and a private company - info they provide has not third party to vent accuracy or fact, just like any other companies, not like a major newspapers. Moreover, it is not about which country or countries they fighter(s) want to represent, (pls note a person might have dual citizenship), but it is about the info is source by independent, reliable source especially when his birth country is known like Belal which is United States and not about their ethnicity, heritage, bloodline, which country they want to represent and etc. Cassiopeia talk 23:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

So, for Belal, we use the USA flag? Also, on UFC 304's page, they wrote "Mick Parkin" for the bonuses as that is the name he goes by when fighting and in most media, but Sherdog put Michael Parkin. So for the "list of current fighters" page, we should use what? It should be consistent with other pages, or can it be Michael Parkin on "current fighters" and "Mick Parkin" on the bonus/fight card section. Marty2Hotty (talk) 01:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, USA flag. We use Michael Parkin as per Sherdog; however, if a page is created for Parkin in Wikipedia and sources indicate Mick instead of Michael (WP: COMMON Name guidelines), then we will change to Mick. Remain Michael until such time. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 01:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]; UFC 304's page lists him as Mick. Marty2Hotty (talk) 02:56, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UFC is not a reliable nor independent source. we only use extremely limited info if we can find the info directly about the fighter in other independent, reliable source. Cassiopeia talk 04:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UFC 304 on Wikipedia. The editors put him as Mick. Marty2Hotty (talk) 04:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=List_of_UFC_records&oldid=prev&diff=1237634514 a user reverted my edit of Belal and says to use Palestine. Marty2Hotty (talk) 19:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:I think I forgot to change the country's total. I only minused the number from the division. Marty2Hotty (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HeinzMaster: Hope you enjoy your holiday in Croatia. Hi Marty2 Hotty, The editor above that you mentioned above - see HERE-hist diff you mentioned), Here-2 Admistrator's Notice Board/edit warring and Here-3 Editor user page, reported by @User: User:Nswi, and the editor is being block for 2 weeks for WP:ASPERSIONS. We add/removed fighters country of origin on country and total when a fighter moved from one division to other division, add debuted fighter, and removed released/retired fighter from the table. I used to recount the info once every 6 month and later User:HeinzMaster do the same two years ago till now to make sure we count it right and didnt forget to make an entry. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 22:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to recount this week. I did my best yesterday but some didn't add up.

I think that editor did his best and had good intentions. I see his point about Belal being Palestinian. I guess he doesn't have a citizenship but he represents them. Marty2Hotty (talk) 02:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for offering to do the recount : Note to @User:HeinzMaster. As for blocked editor mentioned above: As this is Wikipedia, we do not take what the subject (Belal) wants or intention of which country/countries he wants to represent but we adhere to the WP:ETHNICITY guidelines which apply across all subject in Wikipedia. Thank you and have a good day. Cassiopeia talk 02:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recount is done as of now. Took a number of hours over two nights, but it's done! Marty2Hotty (talk) 15:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:ProdigyUpdates looks like he takes part in Wikiproject Pakistan and claims to have been on Wikipedia for 10 years, perhaps with another account not associated with this one. I do think Belal can be considered a "Palestinian-American" (on his intro) based on his parents being Palestinan and him having so much coverage relating to Palestine. Marty2Hotty (talk) 15:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been calculating the fighters' "scores" on List of UFC fighters. User:HeinzMaster. Marty2Hotty (talk) 17:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HeinzMaster: good day. Not the "scores on the fighters' divisions". What I meant was the recount on "Debuted fighters' countries of origin" as we sometimes forget to update when a fighter was retired, released or change weight classes". :::::Btw Marty2Hotty, The intro (the lead) section, can not stated the ethnicity, bloodline, heritage as per WP:ETHNICITY in regardless which country he wants to associate with that goes with all other subject in the entire Wikipedia. We can state his heritage (supported by independent, reliable source) on the Background or personal life section. It is very important for us to adhere to Wikipedia guidelines and not what we see fit or what our opinions. There are some guidelines in Wikipedia I dont agree such as I think every editor should have an account (you dont even have to provide your email address to sign up) and to have strict rules on vandalism (In German Wikipedia, they will only give you 1 or at most 2 times for offenses and they will block you and it works very well in that site. This can only apply to English Wikipedia if the vandalism is extremely serious), but since I edit English Wikipedia, I adhere to the guidelines here and not what I think. Btw, editing 9 years in Wikipedia does not correlated to knowing the Wikipedia guidelines. User ProdigyUpdates has only total edits of 217 and only 171 edits on mainspace - see - here. Thank you for doing the recount. I know it takes a lot of time. Appreciate it. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 22:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my Kennedy post

Mma junkie received confirmation from someone who had knowledge which is why they reported it on their website. If it's not confirmation along with lima's post, they wouldn't report it. The text says:

"With the addition, the UFC 308 lineup now includes:

Ciryl Gane vs. Alexander Volkov

Rinat Fakhretdinov vs. Nursulton Ruziboev

Dan Ige vs. Lerone Murphy

Kennedy Nzechukwu vs. Marcos Rogerio"

Which means the bout has been added to the lineup in mmajunkie's eyes Marty2Hotty (talk) 00:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If a fighter posts they are fighting, and MMAJunkie reaches out to someone who wanted to remain anonymous who confirmed Kennedy was moving to heavyweight, and then subsequently reports it on their website, that is as good as a confirmed report as per journalism. Someone with knowledge told MMAJunkie about Kennedy's move to heavyweight, not specifically about the bout, which was sufficient enough for MMAJunkie to report it on their website. Marty2Hotty (talk) 00:13, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We dont take fighter report as that is not independent nor reliable source as as we dont take info from UFC or any company unless we state that is a quote with supporting source. Secondly, media can always take the info from whoever which they have to confirm the source is reliable. In this case, MMA junkie didnt as it says a person who know the info did. If MMA junkie sure of the source, it will usually state the fight is booked or set and not stating XXX says there are fighting YYY in the article title. You can find another source to add the info in. We do add info just because it is out there so we can add it as quickly as we can, but we wait until reliable, independent source is available. Cassiopeia talk 00:20, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In journalism, they do not announce who provided them with the information, but when they receive enough sources, they publish it, as was the case here. I'm sure you know how journalism works. Marty2Hotty (talk) 00:23, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The bout was added to the lineup of the card as per MMAJunkie's page. It was strong enough reporting to add the bout to the lineup. Marty2Hotty (talk) 00:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes in journalism they dont provide their source. We trust reliable source, because there is a reputable source which always provide accuracy info. I have to disagree with you on this even there is a line up info as per the content of the source. We wait. Wikipedia is not a breaking news and not a news media but an enclyopedia. There will be source available in next few days if the bout is confirmed as other news media will announced it. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UFC Fight Night 249 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to UFC Fight Night 249. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cassiopeia talk 22:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:UFC Fight Night 249 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:UFC Fight Night 249. Thanks! Cassiopeia talk 22:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UFC Fight Night 249 (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GrabUp was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

X, or Twitter, is not a reliable source. Please listen to what the previous reviewer said.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UFC Fight Night 249 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 16:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marty2Hotty! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GrabUp - Talk 16:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UFC Fight Night 249 (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cassiopeia was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UFC Fight Night 249 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cassiopeia talk 05:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UFC Fight Night 249 (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cassiopeia was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UFC Fight Night 249 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cassiopeia talk 05:57, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UFC Fight Night 249 (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UFC Fight Night 249 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UFC Fight Night 249 has been accepted

UFC Fight Night 249, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cassiopeia talk 02:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 in UFC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Whittaker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of current UFC fighters

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of current UFC fighters, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2024 in UFC

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 in UFC, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karate Combat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craig Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

This week I’m out for vacation and only got my phone, so if you want to do all the usual stuff, go right ahead. All the best! HeinzMaster (talk) 08:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I guess Alice Ardelean will debut and needs to be moved to the list alongside with the country flags. Enjoy your vacation. May I ask where you're going Marty2Hotty (talk) 13:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m in Croatia, beautiful weather and beaches here HeinzMaster (talk) 13:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sounds nice. Anyways, I moved Alice Ardelean to WSW and added a number to Romania/WSW/Total, I think correctly. Also, "Moved Jake Hadley from Flyweight to Bantamweight between "Kleydson Rodrigues" and Daniel Argueta based on debut date. Edited number of fighters in England -1 for Flyweight and +1 for Bantamweight and -1 FLW total UFC fighters/+1 BW total UFC fighters because of the move at UFC 304"

Enjoy your vacation. This is actually very time-consuming, haha Marty2Hotty (talk) 20:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, for Belal Muhammad, should he represent USA or Palestine. On UFC broadcasts, the Palestine flag is next to his name. I am wondering what flag we should use for him for Wikipedia. Marty2Hotty (talk) 11:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your '''only warning'''; if you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia again, as you did at [[:2024 in Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. Chauncey Green (talk) 09:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What? I'm the primary editor of the page. How did I vandalize it? I am updating the card. Marty2Hotty (talk) 09:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain - https://www.bkfc.com/events/bkfc-66-blas-vs-reber:98124ce9-0001-4314-bd34-798a0bcc9e6f I updated the bout order as per this page and have been updating the bout order for BKFC all year long. How is this vandalism? Look at the history of the page to see how I am the primary editor of the results and bout order. Please remove my warning or provide an explanation. Marty2Hotty (talk) 09:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this account is issuing fake warnings for many accounts and has themselves received a warning for leaving many templates on many talk pages. I hope action is taken against this account. Marty2Hotty (talk) 09:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marty, I've blocked Chauncey Green for their little spree, and commented out their warning to you. Sorry you got caught up in this. Ϣere SpielChequers 11:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for taking action! Marty2Hotty (talk) 12:48, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your significant contributions to Wikipedia. Over 300k. It's rare to find an account actually older than mine. Mine is from 2008 and yours is from 2007! Marty2Hotty (talk) 12:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And if anyone had told me in early 2007 that I would wind up replacing my daily Sudoku with a hobby of editing an online encyclopaedia my jaw would have dropped. Ϣere SpielChequers 13:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2024 in UFC

added a link pointing to Natália Silva

List of UFC bonus award recipients

added a link pointing to Natália Silva

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ilia Topuria

hello, I comment here to tell you to please not revert the edit I made, Ilia Topuria is only Spanish currently because of Georgia's law, and I have sources to back up that he only has Spanish citizenship at the moment. https://www.elespanol.com/deportes/otros-deportes/20240305/gobierno-concede-nacionalidad-espanola-ilia-topuria/837666430_0.html https://www.sport.es/es/noticias/ufc/ilia-topuria-paso-recuperar-nacionalidad-99693367 https://www.sport.es/es/noticias/ufc/oficial-ilia-topuria-espanol-99042250 https://as.com/masdeporte/polideportivo/ilia-topuria-ya-es-espanol-n/ https://www.marca.com/combates-ufc/2024/03/05/65e70986ca4741022b8b459d.html https://www.20minutos.es/deportes/noticia/5228679/0/ilia-topruia-nacionalidad-georgia-espanola/

So, if you could undo you undoing, I'd really appreciate it, thanks. Alberto González Seguí (talk) 07:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe an exception was made for Ilia. Marty2Hotty (talk) 12:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask user Cassiopeia. He seems to be an authority on this type of stuff. Go on his talk page and ask him about Ilia Topiria's nationality. If he approves, it should be fine.

There is a lot of debate on what to use for him but the general consensus is for him to be listed as Georgian, primarily. Marty2Hotty (talk) 12:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Anthony Hernandez

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Anthony Hernandez, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into UFC Fight Night: Moreno vs. Albazi. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I've completed a history merge on the two articles. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Snake eyes" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Snake eyes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 1 § Snake eyes until a consensus is reached. 162 etc. (talk) 16:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of male mixed martial artists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Felipe Silva.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fixed Marty2Hotty (talk) 22:43, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of male mixed martial artists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KSW.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. fixed Marty2Hotty (talk) 22:43, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of current UFC fighters

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of current UFC fighters, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]