User talk:MadisonGrundtvig

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MadisonGrundtvig.

Hello, and welcome to my user talk page! Feel free to leave me a message here whenever you want.

Welcome!

Hello, MadisonGrundtvig, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as TASVideos, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kolbasz (talk) 16:00, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TASVideos

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TASVideos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kolbasz (talk) 16:00, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

1.) Someone has "reviewed my sandbox". What does this mean? Could someone tell me? Does it mean that someone viewed my sandbox, approved of it, or something else? 2.) Why are there not separate languages of Wikipedia for different dialects of languages, such as British English, American English, and Canadian English? I think there should be because Wikipedia mixes them and that can get quite confusing.

Hi, MadisonGrundtvig –

For this one, the only thing might be the automated page patroller software was somehow enabled for your sandbox. Whoever was the patroller at the time saw the page and let you know that it had been reviewed. No big deal. (added: Here is a page that has more detail... Wikipedia:Patrols)
Please consider the complications of having a separate Wikipedia for every different dialect of every different language in the world, even the many different English dialects (yes, there are more than just three). Wikipedia does have policies and guidelines for language considerations, and most disputes can be settled by discussion on any particular article's talk page. I recently participated in just such a discussion at Talk:Greenland#WP:ENGVAR, in case you'd like to see how such things go. Thank you for asking! Joys! – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 21:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See also... List of dialects of the English language – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX!

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angela (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Angela Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blachman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erik Brandt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Pulse may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*''[[The Pulse (album|The Pulse]]'', an album by [[Thomas Blachman]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Honeyhive galaxy

Hello MadisonGrundtvig, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Honeyhive galaxy, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: No reason given. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:45, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox Help

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Is there a way that you can search Wikipedia for userboxes so that I can search things to put on my profile page? [User:MadisonGrundtvig|MadisonGrundtvig]] (talk) 17:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Reply to {{help me}} request: The article Wikipedia:Userboxes has a large list of categories of User Boxes which you can peruse to locate what you're looking for. Hope that helps. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 18:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your question at the Reference desk

Please don't talk about "pedophile discrimination" here, it's a loaded term and offends people. I've removed that part of your question. Bishonen | talk 12:29, 31 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Good one

Hi, MadisonGrundtvig. Your "Don't click this userbox" userbox is pretty funny. I hadn't seen that one before. Bishonen | talk 20:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Oh, haha, thanks. I found that in the list of humorous userboxes somewhere. So assuming that you read my userpage, thanks for that too! MadisonGrundtvig (talk) 21:18, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tropical Fish (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Tropical Fish (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:37, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I rescued this page from speedy deletion so that it may be discussed at Wikipedia talk:Hatnote#Linking to episodes of a television series – improper use of a hatnote for trivial information? (by the way it is bad form for the nominator to blank the page, and then use the fact that the page is blank to justify speedy deletion). Wbm1058 (talk) 15:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hope you have some patience with the Wikipedia editor community and stick around. Everyone here has the experience of having their edits reverted or deleted, and the ones who stay learn to roll with the punches. You're obviously very intelligent for a girl your age. Thought I would try connecting you with User:Keilana, who from listening to her on WP:Wikipedia Weekly, started editing Wikipedia at a young age and may have some advice for you. Best, Wbm1058 (talk) 20:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Madison, nice to meet you! I'm happy to help you out with any questions you may have! Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 04:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hi MadisonGrundtvig, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:56, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal safety

Hi Madison. I'm Dave. I've been on Wikipedia for a few years and I've spent most of my time working with new users. More recently, I've been helping out behind the scenes on Wikipedia but I do like to pop my head above the parapet when I see someone struggling.

I see you've had a bit of information removed from your page, because you're a younger editor. I'm afraid this does sometime have to happen. Wikipedia is one of the biggest websites on the internet and as such any information that you post will be visible to millions of people. We recommend against having any sort of personal information, especially contact information, included anywhere on the site due to the possibility of things going wrong very quickly. I know you're probably annoyed by that, but it's really important. There's lots more information at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors, I really do recommend you spend a little time reading it. So, to answer your question from GorillaWarfare's page, your information will not be replaced.

I'd also like to reinforce Bishonen's comments from Friday, Wikipedia is not a forum and discussions of the sort will likely end up with you being blocked.

Now that unpleasantness is out of the way, could I spend a little time congratulating you for writing Don't Look At It! Don't Touch It! It's difficult to get into article writing and I hope you spend time writing more. In fact, I'd really like it if you could have a go at The Lighthouse Keeper's Cat by Rhonda and David Armitage - a book I loved when I was growing up! Just a suggestion, of course Worm^TT(talk) 12:45, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Madison, You might not have found it yet but Wikipedia offers a safe way for you to let other editors contact you privately: if you "enable email", they can send you an email message and you get to see their email address but they don't get to see yours. You can obviously then choose whether to reply to them off-wiki and let them have your email address, or to keep the correspondence at arm's length by emailing through Wikipedia. To do this, go to "Preferences" and look at the bottom of the first tab, "User Preferences". If you tick "Enable email from other users", then a link to "Email this user" appears in the left-hand bar on your user page and talk page (see Dave's or mine to see what it looks like). It's better than having your contact details splashed around the internet for all and sundry to see, but still means that editors can contact you personally. Welcome and Happy Editing! (Wikipedia talk:Hatnote is on my watchlist and I got involved in the discussions there, in case you wonder where I've come from.) PamD 14:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, I wouldn't be recommending younger editors enable their emails, there's nothing that needs to be said privately that can't be said on their talk page. Worm^TT(talk) 12:45, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Look At It! Don't Touch It! Article

Note: I have split this off of the previous topic since we have gone off-topic from the original purpose of the discussion. MadisonGrundtvig (talk) 22:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Worm That Turned:: Do you think Don't Look At It! Don't Touch It! might go for WP:DYK, with a "hook" like "Did you know that ... Don't Look At It! Don't Touch It! was written after the author read a book where a mother said those words to a child stung by a bee", or " ... was written because children at his school wanted more spooky books in his school library"? (Incidentally, Madison, that's not clear: was the author a school teacher, or a school student?) Just a thought, anyway. It seems to be long enough. PamD 14:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea to me :) Worm^TT(talk) 14:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Patschke is a school librarian as well as an author, but I was going to save that for his own article, but maybe it is a good idea after all to mention this in this article somewhere. MadisonGrundtvig (talk) 15:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There's no problem with duplication of facts :D Worm^TT(talk) 16:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I'll fix it up and work on fitting it in with the correct segment of the paragraph. MadisonGrundtvig (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I find Steve Patschke an interesting author with an awesome personality and background, from what I've researched so far, so I'm very excited to write articles for him. It really is too bad that his books never got more popular than they did, but you never know what is yet to come for him and his literature. It is also a big pity that, other than the articles and edits I have contributed, there is no reference whatsoever to Steve Patschke or any of his books on Wikipedia as a whole. MadisonGrundtvig (talk) 22:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's not uncommon with children's authors - they may publish dozens of books, which are loved by millions, but no one has really written the articles on them. Have a go, if you enjoy it, you could be our expert! Worm^TT(talk) 08:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I ask for patience, because I want to find out all information possible about this author, and that means buying his title The Spooky Book, the only other published book, as far as I know, which he has written. MadisonGrundtvig (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Could someone please go to my Sandbox and fix the coordinates problem? I don't know how to. Also, could you make it so that a dot appears on the city's location on the North Dakota map? (Hint: This is going to be a real page) MadisonGrundtvig (talk | contribs) 20:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. You don't use -98, you just use 98, because the latter parameter specifies W for west. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 21:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I appreciate that very much! MadisonGrundtvig (talk | contribs) 21:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help again

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

1. What is the notability criteria for articles about websites? Like my "TASVideos" page got deleted, and now I'm scared of writing pages for websites. Maybe if I knew the criteria, I'd be able to check those sites to see if they match such criteria.

2. Also, just another question. I saw somewhere on Wikipedia (don't remember where), but it said all things must be checked for notability except for educational institutions. Can you explain that to me further?

3. I also want to join WikiProject Disambiguation. How do I do this? I want to put a userbox on my page that says that I am part of it.

MadisonGrundtvig (talk | contribs) 23:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the general notability guidelines. Here are the specific guidelines for websites. Also, this essay might also help.
I'm not sure, but this general notability guideline would seem to contradict it.
I think you just add your name here, put up the userbox, and collaborate with other members' whenever you have the opportunity. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Winter Olympics (disambiguation)

Hallo Madison, in your edit to Winter Olympics (disambiguation) you not only removed a list which probably needed to be removed, but also removed the AfD template which must not be removed. I've reverted, and will now take the list out again. Please take care not to accidentally remove templates like this.

I'm sorry to see from your user page that you have made a decision not to use edit summaries in most cases. These are considered "good practice" (see Help:Edit summary) and are appreciated by other editors as they show what you were intending to do, or why you did what you did. Please reconsider. Thanks. PamD 15:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the AfD because that is not a page that is necessary to delete. The long list was not necessary and is probably listed in another article anyway. Lists like that are not what disambiguation pages are for, but everything else is fine and should stay. Also, I do not use edit summaries because you cannot edit them if you make a mistake on them, or if you said something you want to take back. MadisonGrundtvig (talk | contribs) 17:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfD templates are not like PROD or Speedy delete nominations: you must not delete the template until the discussion has been concluded - and it says so, within the template ("this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed"). If you don't think the article should be deleted, then you should go to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winter Olympics (disambiguation) (follow the link which says "this article's entry") and say so there. Just removing the AfD template is disruptive editing: please never do so again. Thanks. PamD 00:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal "test" article

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hey. I'm very interested in the history of a certain, amusing (to me) long since banned sock puppeteer on Wikipedia. I know I can't just put an article about him on Wikipedia since it's not notable anyway and I would get in trouble pretty quickly. I want to make an article about him by doing this. http://www.wiki.x.io/User:MadisonGrundtvig/theuserspagename

And put CITED information about the user. As a sandbox page. Am I allowed to do this? Or does that break the rules of writing about other users. Note: I will NOT use opinions, I will base my "article" fully on the sources of information I find. MadisonGrundtvig (talk | contribs) 17:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would think that it would fall foul of one or two things. One might well be WP:FAKEARTICLE. Another might be WP:OUTING if the person in question has not already been outed and has not self-outed. If methods are discussed, WP:BEANS might be involved. Peridon (talk) 17:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then what are the articles on the user page for? MadisonGrundtvig (talk | contribs) 17:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User page articles are like drafts or sandbox. Several editors create an article there before sending it to mainspace. Some other users also use subpages in their userspace as a storage space for information that may come in handy later on while editing. My sandbox is one of them.

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:34, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Sub pages are for drafts, info storage (but not free web space...), and so on. I can't really see the point of this, and wonder who would look at it - and if no-one does, why bother? Also, I wonder how you seem to know enough about the subject when your account is only about four months old... Peridon (talk) 17:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

You have a reply on my talk page. Deltasim (talk) 17:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bambifan101

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

The user Bambifan101 is a 2008-2012 infamous sock puppeteer on Wikipedia. He claimed to be 13 years old in 2008 according to an incident report. Despite all of his vandalism, for the most part he made some pretty decent edits. True, he did work very hard for 4 years to continue to make accounts, but the whole time, he was mostly making decent edits, and contributing to Wikipedia. It is now 2014, and if he was 13 in 2008, then gosh, now he must be 19 years old. He probably cares nothing about being a Wikipedia deviant anymore anyway, and gave up two years ago it seems. Unless of course it was just a claim and he was really an immature adult trying to impersonate a 13 year old this whole time (which I can actually imagine, many people do this to troll). Anyway, since he was trying his best on his edits and stuff on many of his account, and in face on many accounts I saw, he was being completely good, and was abiding by the rules, and then got an unexpected ban. Why did he get banned so many times? Why does banning sock puppets have to be such a commitment? Why didn't you guys leave him alone when he was trying to help us out? MadisonGrundtvig (talk | contribs) 22:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any evidence that Bambifan101 still wants to be a Wikipedia editor after all this time? Anyway, you may want to have a look at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bambifan101 for the problems that editor caused, and the comment that his absence may be due to a denial of service by Bell South. Is there a particular reason you're that interested in this user's fate? Huon (talk) 23:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well to be honest he kind of reminds me of myself when I was younger. I never actually vandalized Wikipedia but I have vandalized TASVideos and other speedrun sites in the past, but I'm more mature now and don't do that stuff anymore. As a former troll, I think his immaturity was quite humorous. I know you probably don't but I especially laughed at his deleting the page The Princess and the Frog and replacing it with complaints about the movie "Spider's Web: A Pig's Tale" which does not have an article because he was "bored". He also self admitted to being a sock several times. I liked the username User:Ohnobarney and User:Ohnothesimpsons. But I found him through his sock account User:Iluvteletubbies in his redirect "Tellytubby" (which is NOT vandalism since it is a common misspelling). So the point of my response is: anyway, I just am saying, why did he get banned so many times on specific accounts that were harmless? Why not just ban the ones that actually harmed Wikipedia instead of the all socks must be banned, full commitment thing? MadisonGrundtvig (talk | contribs) 23:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a year or two to become familiar with Wikipedia's purpose (developing an encyclopedia) and standard procedures before raising commentary about banned users. All websites attract problematic users who do little to help the website, but who seek attention for themselves. New users should not amplify those attempts—this is not a forum where we discuss each other. Johnuniq (talk) 00:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MadisonGrundtvig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please. I am not Bambifan101. I am was only asking questions about him. You can see that my IP is not where any of his were anyway. I have no interest in the Disney movies he has mentioned. The only common interest we have is Teletubbies. I beg you, please don't mistake me for him. Please listen to me. I know he's said this with his accounts several times, but I am not him and I have not done anything wrong. I have not done any harm and you are mistaken, because the discussion for him has been closed and his service was likely denied. You can see clearly that I am not him because of my actions on Wikipedia. Try comparing my edits and actions with his, because we are completely different people. Please listen to me, for I love Wikipedia. This really is a false ban, I promise.

Decline reason:

This is implausible. There is no reason for non-sock new editors to edit content related to banned sockmasters. Sandstein 17:09, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yoshi's Unexpected Appearance listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yoshi's Unexpected Appearance. Since you had some involvement with the Yoshi's Unexpected Appearance redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:43, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Underwater Cosmic Mario Race listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Underwater Cosmic Mario Race. Since you had some involvement with the Underwater Cosmic Mario Race redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:44, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Sinking Lava Spire listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Sinking Lava Spire. Since you had some involvement with the The Sinking Lava Spire redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:48, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Faster Than a Speeding Penguin listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Faster Than a Speeding Penguin. Since you had some involvement with the Faster Than a Speeding Penguin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:46, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Don't Look At It! Don't Touch It!'s front cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Don't Look At It! Don't Touch It!'s front cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. – Fayenatic London 08:29, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]