User talk:BangladeshiEditorInSylhet

Welcome, Macarius Ibne Mito!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Macarius Ibne Mito! I'm Mujinga, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! Mujinga (talk) 12:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hi Macarius Ibne Mito! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Attacks on schools during the Israeli invasion of Gaza that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk me) 09:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Speederzzz Sorry, I will change the edit summary next time if i edit. Macarius Ibne Mito (talk) 10:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 11:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only cite reliable sources

Thank you for your interest in contributing to the article Bangladesh genocide. However, please do not cite sources such as modern day newspaper editorials, opinion pieces, or commentary for matters of historical fact. Such a source is reliable only for documenting the opinion of the writer (such as a reviewer's feeling about a film).

Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (history) describes the best sort of sources to use in articles about history, generally scholarly works written by historians or academics in allied fields. Other sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on biased narratives and personal opinions.

If you require further assistance, please look at Wikipedia:Reliable sources, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 07:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clean

Could you please clean North South University, BAF Shaheen College Dhaka and Daffodil International University. 37.111.207.77 (talk) 18:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@37.111.207.77 I'll try BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 04:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you plz update the new principal name of BAFSD to the article according to their website. 37.111.194.85 (talk) 05:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@37.111.194.85 I'll try. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 06:38, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Stop editwarring on Battle of Bint Jbeil. The last 12 edits to the page have been you and מתיאל making the same trivial revert of each other. Take content issues to the talk page. Also, this edit summary is unacceptable. Longhornsg (talk) 19:53, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate edit summaries

Edit summaries like this and this are not constructive. Calling sources deprecated because you disagree with them and throwing around Zionist is not constructive. Also calling Zionists terrorists on your userpage is WP:POLEMIC, so I removed that. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May I add that the current statements on this editor's talkpage, calling to "remove Pro-Zionist statements on Wikipedia, The Pro-Zionist or Pro-Western editing lowers the credibility of Wikipedia and makes it less reliable", raise possible issues of WP:NOTHERE, WP:RGW and contribute to the growing battleground behavior we see in this topic area. 916crdshn (talk) 17:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi, I noticed you removed a helpful link without explanation in this edit on World War II.

Checking your edit history, I see that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. For me, it would have sped up the process of finding the edit where the change occurred, as well as understanding any reasoning behind it.

Even a short summary is better than no summary, and they're particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may want to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your editing preferences.

Thanks! — W.andrea (talk) 22:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks and edit summaries

I noticed that you have been making changes to wikilinks which were complying with WP:MOS before your changes. You have then used types of style that are not recommended with no description of your actions in the edit summary. Please have a look at the guidance on MOS:PIPESTYLE which explains how to treat plurals and other derived names. I see that other editors have already commented about you using no edit summaries (or inappropriate phrases) on your talk page and have given you feedback on actions that you should take. Drchriswilliams (talk) 12:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the DCWC!

Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, BangladeshiEditorInSylhet! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Romanized text

How to write romanized text in wikipedia? Can you help me about this. Lahsim Niasoh (talk) 15:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lahsim Niasoh Sure, Just go to Google Translate, Translate the English text to whatever language you selected to be translated to, underneath the translated text.

Then, There is the romanized text. If it does not work, or you don’t understand, reply. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 15:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, Thank you so much. Lahsim Niasoh (talk) 16:34, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1958 East Pakistan-India border clash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1958 East Pakistan-India border clash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1958 East Pakistan-India border clash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 10:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Short description capitalization

WP:SHORTDESC are not titles, and as such should use sentence case (e.g., only capitalize first letter and proper nouns). Please don't apply title case as you did here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie Alright. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 13:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, per WP:SDNONE, articles like this have self-explanatory titles and should not have short descriptions. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC August update

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for a month, and we've already seen some momentous improvement in the quality of many articles about underrepresented subjects! So far, our top-scoring participants are:

Magentic Manifestations (submissions) – 338 points, mainly from nine good articles. He's a contender for the "most submissions for a single country" specialty award, with nine submissions for India.
Arconning (submissions) – 305 points, including from six seasonally-appropriate Olympics-related good articles.
Generalissima (submissions) – 290 points, the bulk from her featured article about Greenlandic interpreter Qalaherriaq and two China-related good articles.
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) – 245 points, mostly from the achievement of bringing Genghis Khan to featured status.
Thebiguglyalien (submissions) – 144 points from three good articles, including two about Kiribati elections, and four reviews of good article nominees.

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier! The coordinators would like to extend a special thanks to Thebiguglyalien (submissions) for his commitment to keeping these review pages up to date.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Bangladesh Army, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. In particular, please familiarize yourself with the Manual of Style related to capitalization. In general, only proper nouns and beginning of sentences get capitalized. – macaddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 13:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury Ok, Sure. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 16:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ramu Cantonment English School and College

Hello, BangladeshiEditorInSylhet,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Pppery and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Ramu Cantonment English School and College, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Anything I should attempt to prevent deletion of the page? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 16:36, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2014 Bangladesh-Myanmar border skirmish for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Bangladesh-Myanmar border skirmish is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Bangladesh-Myanmar border skirmish until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 06:52, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful links, polluting meta data

Internal links are not all good. Within citations, the work may be linked "if relevant". It does not have to be linked, and is not always relevant. The purpose of citations is to allow readers to find the source that supports the information that cites it.

I can't imagine any situation in which linking Dhaka Tribune or bdnews24.com makes a source easier to find, the name alone is quite sufficient. If the source is obscure, has a name that has varied significantly over the years, or has a common name that might easily be confused with a different source, and has no other identifying information (such as a url) then a link might be relevant.

Although The Daily Star is not a unique name for a newspaper, it is generally obvious from context whether the Bangladeshi or Lebanese paper is meant. I would only link a citation to The Daily Star (Bangladesh) in an article where both newspapers are cited, or an article about a Lebanese topic, where a reader might otherwise assume The Daily Star (Lebanon) was meant.

Never, never, ever add "BD" to the end of the name of a work. The newspapers are named The Daily Star and Daily Sun, not The Daily Star BD or Daily Sun BD. Please clean up this pollution anywhere you've done it.

If you are at a loss for things to do, check out:

Worldbruce (talk) 17:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleaned up the "|work=<newspaper name> BD" mess for you.

You make some useful edits, which are sincerely appreciated. In your recent ones, however, for every one that fixes something, another creates a new problem. Editors are allowed to make mistakes, and maybe you're just having a bad day, but that is not a good ratio of beneficial to detrimental edits. Successful contributors to Wikipedia find something they're good at and stick to it. Some editors, for example, concentrate on images or categories because they aren't fluent in English. If you're great at spelling or punctuation, but weak on capitalization rules, focus on what you're good at and leave the rest to other editors who have different strengths. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce Alright, Please notify me if I make that mistake again. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 07:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Parbatta News for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parbatta News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parbatta News until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paharer Alo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paharer Alo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paharer Alo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radio Capital (Dhaka), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World News. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daily Jalalabad

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daily Jalalabad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Jalalabad. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 08:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@আফতাবুজ্জামান No, this is not my first page, Sure I'll contest the deletion. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 08:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammadpur A. Gafur Government Primary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammadpur A. Gafur Government Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammadpur A. Gafur Government Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 08:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Riverview Cantonment Board School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riverview Cantonment Board School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverview Cantonment Board School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 08:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jalalabad Cantonment English School And College for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jalalabad Cantonment English School And College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalalabad Cantonment English School And College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 06:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 08:49, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

I might make mistakes in edit summaries. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 14:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Manab Zamin

added a link pointing to Alexa

Md Shafeenul Islam

added a link pointing to The Telegraph

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC September update

The Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for two months, and we've seen tremendous improvement in the encyclopedic coverage of several underrepresented areas from a wide range of editors! The coordinators would like to highlght some of the newer faces who have been making notable contributions in the contest, including but by no means limited to:

Arconning (submissions) – 386 points, with several good articles primarily relating to the Olympics
Vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 141 points, who created multiple articles about abortion rights and laws in African countries
TheNuggeteer (submissions) – 126 points, who has contributed to several articles associated with the Phillippines
Jaguarnik (submissions) – 125 points, with several good article reviews and an appearance in the In the news section of the Main Page
Averageuntitleduser (submissions) – 119 points, and has written about several Haitian topics and historical figures.

Only one month remains until the end of the contest, so it's time to make your remaining nominations! Please consider answering some review requests, particularly the older entries, as a way of helping out your fellow participants and moving up the leaderboard. Good luck!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]