User talk:MLD

Welcome!

Hello, MLD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Wimbledon F.C.

Your latest edit is reasonably fair and neutral, but one item opens another can of worms. You say that the club was "forced" to move out (nobody put a gun to their heads. You'll need to rephrase that slightly). The relevant bit of the detailed section says at the end of the 1990–91 season Wimbledon decided that its cramped Plough Lane ground was beyond redevelopment. Without getting into opinions like "everybody knows that it was worth more as a site for a supermarket" and "Merton Council put impossible conditions in their way", can you find out what really caused the first relocation? --Concrete Cowboy 16:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Wimbledon

I don't understand why you edited the AFC article to say that the club was originally Old Centrals. There is no legal connection between AFC and Old Centrals. --Concrete Cowboy 17:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I didn't! Someone else entered that (possibly one of 195.93.21.136; 80.41.8.5; 86.130.22.94; or 86.130.22.94, although I'm not sure which without checking it, see Talk:AFC_Wimbledon#Vandalism.) and I just didn't address it when removing other edits from the page which were posted at a similar time and were actually vandalism.

Secondly, there is no legal connection between Old Centrals and any other clubs bearing the "Wimbledon" name. I believe that the original contributor's inference is that AFC Wimbledon is a continuation of the spirit which formed Old Centrals, which subsequently and independently sustained Wimbledon FC and which now (again independently) sponsors AFC Wimbledon.

Clear as mud?! --Matt derry 15:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I didn't think of reversion being the reason for your name being on the first appearance I found. --Concrete Cowboy 16:35, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I have misinterpreted the tone of your comment but it sounds like a sarcastic remark inferring that a) I did make the edit in question and b) I lied when I clarified that I didn't. If so I don't appreciate it!

Since you have taken issue with it, I think you will find, upon closer examination of the article's history, that the first occurrance of that text is in Revision of 22:57, 25 August 2006 , which was not by me but by 195.93.21.136.

--Matt derry 17:53, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, I was explaining how it was that I came to think that you had done it and that it hadn't occured to me to go back further. It should have. My mistake. No slight intended! (and yes, I think that is how to link to earlier articles).

Note theWikipedia:Assume good faith policy - we should always assume that the other guy is trying to be positive unless he confirms that he definitely intended to bad mouth you. Accusing someone of implying that you are lying is nearly as bad as accusing them of lying themselves. But in this case, I accept that my reply was ambiguous so you were within your rights to challenge (though I'd have stopped at [a]!)

(by the way, it is customary to reply on the other person's talk page - it means that Wiki prompts them that there is a new message.) --Concrete Cowboy 19:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True (about maybe not being welcome to edit AFC Wimbledon - yes, you are right about Good Faith getting caught regularly in the offside trap when it comes to football club articles!) --Concrete Cowboy 20:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Surrey County Football Association.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Surrey County Football Association.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Plough Lane

I've done a major tidy up on the Plough Lane article that you might want to review. As you will see from the history, I did it in two "bites". The first edit just deleted a nest of link spam, dead links, links to personal pages etc, to restore it to a basic Wiki article. That revealed duplicated material and no real structure. So the second bite was to knock it into some kind of shape. Have a look and see what you think. --Concrete Cowboy 23:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

all good edits. Most of what you revised existed in the original article before my clean-up - it was what made me think of asking you to look at it. --Concrete Cowboy 12:41, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Football in the United Kingdom

Hi. I really think combining {{Football in the United Kingdom}} with {{Football in Scotland}} {and with the other three) rather defeats the whole purpose of having separate templates. You may also want to consider that it would be better to use the template (the UK one) selectively, i.e. on articles that actually benefit from it’s inclusion, as opposed to simply welding it on to another template. I would appreciate your opinion. I will revert the template until we (and any others) can reach some sort of agreement. Also you may wish to take a look the pages where the template has not been added correctly, for example: United_Kingdom_national_football_team#External_links. Thanks, Kanaye 14:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here -- MLD 11:03, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I take your points, how about we use this ever so slightly modified template on the following pages:

Football in the United Kingdom
United Kingdom team
Football in England
Football in Northern Ireland
Football in Scotland
Football in Wales
Home Championship
Rous Cup
Coronation Cup
Texaco Cup
Anglo-Scottish Cup

Sound like a deal? Kanaye 19:16, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here --MLD 11:03, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How about we include it on the national team pages, as you suggest, but keep the template as it is? It just seems slightly misleading to suggest a total equivalence between the UK team and the other four, when in reality they are quite different and separate. I’m happy to add the template if you’re agreeable? Kanaye 13:24, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here-- MLD · T · C · @: 13:53, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not suggesting that the UK team shouldn’t be included, just that is should be a little bit more discrete. To be fair, I have conceded quite a lot already. I think this template is a pretty good compromise. Kanaye 14:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here -- MLD · T · C · @: 14:48, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because the UK team is insignificant compared to the other teams. It’s like saying an under-19 team should be given priority over a full team. Has the UK team ever competed at the World Cup? What about at the European Championship? Is it even a member of UEFA? It certainly isn’t included in this template: {{Template:UEFA_teams}}

You say that the UK link should be separate yet somehow not different? How is this possible within a coherent and uncomplicated template? I’m really struggling to understand your viewpoint on this. As for the other point, Football in the United Kingdom is the title so another link isn’t really required. I beginning to wonder whether this entire template is really required! Kanaye 16:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wimbledon history

Hello. Sorry to trouble you with this message from out of the blue, but after having a look at the AFC Wimbledon page history, you seemed to be someone who knows a lot about the club and its predecessor, and I was wondering if you could help point me in the right direction.

I have recently become interested in family history, and have been doing some research into my great-grandfather, one Gordon Campbell Emslie. He played as a left-half for Wimbledon at some point during his career as an amateur footballer — I've no idea how long for, although the only concrete references I have been able to track down are a handful of The Times match reports from the 1922–23 season, in which he is singled out a couple of times, once for scoring a particularly good goal (against Dorking in the FA Amateur Cup on October 14 1922) and once for clearing a shot off the line (against Northampton Nomads in the same competition a couple of months later).

Anyway, I was wondering if you could possibly point me in the direction of any good sources of Dons history in which I might be able to find out a bit more about my great-grandfather's career there in the 1920s — I've tried the historicaldons website, but there's no mention there in their 1920s section. Are there any good books, for example, which cover the club in this era which I should try and track down?

Thanks for taking the time to read this rambling message, anyway, and apologies for the intrusion. Angmering 17:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here. -- MLD · T · C · @: 11:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Goodness! Many, many thanks for your very thorough reply to my enquiry — it was very, very kind of you and I am very grateful for all the information and leads you have been able to provide. Thank you also to your fellow fans who helped provide info. I will definitely try and check out the Morden Library newspaper archives the next time I am in London (stuck living in Norwich at the moment!) and see if I can track any mentions of him down.

All this information will certainly also be of interest to my great uncle, GCE's son, who seems very proud of his father's footballing career but has never really known a great deal of the details of it. I'm glad I've been able to dig up some more info for him.

By way of thanks, are you interested in me e-mailing you some copies of the Wimbledon match reports from The Times that I downloaded from their ditigal archive site? I have the reports of Wimbledon 3-5 Clapton (Isthmian League, Aug 26 1922, report from Aug 28), Wimbledon 6-2 The Casuals (FA Amateur Cup, Nov 25 1922, report Nov 27), Wimbledon 0-2 Northampton Nomads (FA Amateur Cup, Dec 9 1922, report from Dec 11) and London Caledonians 1-0 Wimbledon (London Charity Cup, Jan 13 1923, report Jan 15). They're quite nice little reports — drop me a line at pa.hayes at ntlworld.com (e-mail address written that way to avoid automated spam).

Thanks once again for all your help! Angmering 17:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

When creating disambiguation pages, you should move the old target to a new target and then edit the old page, which by that time has become a redirect page. Punkmorten 09:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here. -- MLD · T · C · @: 13:12, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The post was in reference to Steve Butler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and John Boswell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Punkmorten 16:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Wimbledon rename

Just to say thanks for starting the survey. PeterGrecian 15:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Club names and representation

I do not consider my observations at talk:A.F.C. Wimbledon to be nonsense.

I excluded national teams (you have no grounds to assume that I am English, incidentally) from my observations on the grounds that they are selected by an authority (your omission of that criteria in your attempt to ridicule my posting leads me to suspect that you realised that that was my intention).

You assert, with no attempt to present a reasoned argument, that a team represents an area simply by adoption of a name: if my friends decided to name their 5-a-side team Great Britain, would they thereby represent the nation? By your assertion, they would.

I do not consider it a shame that I am not a supporter of Colchester United: although I moved to this town a few years ago, I have remained a supporter of the team that I have been a fan of for more than 25 years, and make a 150 mile round trip on matchdays to use my season ticket: I did not, you may be interested to know, make the journey of a similar distance to watch our recent fixtures at Milton Keynes as a matter of principle. You have, without any grounds for doing so, levelled what you consider an insult at me.

Even if you cannot bring yourself to apologise, I would request that you edit your comments on the talk page to remove the insulting tone, and consider presenting reasons for your belief that a commercial organisation, no matter how much they might be of local interest, can claim to represent a locality. Kevin McE 00:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Daniel Webb (Yeovil).JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Daniel Webb (Yeovil).JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Kevin Cooper (striker)

AfD nomination of Kevin Cooper (striker)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kevin Cooper (striker), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Cooper (striker). Thank you. PeeJay 10:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Army Football Association logo.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Army Football Association logo.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IPA

Hi,

If you need help with the IPA, feel free to ask me or on the talk page at WP:IPA etc. kwami (talk) 09:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello MLD! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 186 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Joe Sheerin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Lewis Cook - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Army Football Association logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Army Football Association logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dave Anderson (footballer)

The article Dave Anderson (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in or managed a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:20, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Afc2

Template:Afc2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.. QED237 (talk) 23:14, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Surrey County Football Association.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Surrey County Football Association.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Afc2

Template:Afc2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 18:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Rooney (footballer, born 1978) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Rooney (footballer, born 1978) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Rooney (footballer, born 1978) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 10:39, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom King (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe McDonnell. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]