User talk:LtJohnny117

March 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Yorba Linda, California, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 19:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Yorba Linda, California, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 2003 LN 6 20:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Yorba Linda, California, you may be blocked from editing. Squeakachu (talk) 20:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Yorba Linda, California. Qcne (talk) 21:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LtJohnny117 I have reported you to the Administrators for persistent promotional edits/vandalism. Qcne (talk) 21:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Omar Agamy (March 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Qcne (talk) 21:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LtJohnny117! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 21:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 21:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how are my edits disruptive. I contributed to the city that I live in. LtJohnny117 (talk) 21:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You contributed AI-generated completely unsourced promotional trash. Qcne (talk) 21:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote all the edits I made. LtJohnny117 (talk) 21:34, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I contributed to the city that I live in, the city I was born in, and the city on my California driver's license. I wrote a nice paragraph about how the city and its "notable people" influenced the area. And, renamed "notable people" so that leaders and other celebrities are separated because of the impact to the area. LtJohnny117 (talk) 21:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition of unsourced text is against our policies, and you added yourself as a "notable" person when you absolutely are not. Your draft autobiographic article was AI generated trash. Qcne (talk) 21:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a "notable" person in the area, and I changed "notable person" section to two sections so that it include the area's influences and the impact the area has. My unpublished draft is not autobiographical work. I sourced my text my placing wikipedia links on pro-nouns and on names of people / businesses. LtJohnny117 (talk) 22:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You do not meet our special definition of a notable person. You are not notable by Wikipedia standards. Your draft (which you submitted for review in order to publish it) was a waste of voluntneer time. Wikilinks are not sources. Qcne (talk) 22:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I volunteer too. I writing articles and making movies, tv shows, and music all for free with no ads. for people, I am someone "worthy of notice" because Google, Inc. sent me a 1099 contract when I was a kid. I also earned over 1 millions views before I had a high school diploma. I have educational awards and test scores that only a small number of people can actually achieve. I am "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" because I am the first person and the only person who owns the URL domains that I own. No one else can buy these URL domains. I was quick enough and smart enough to have the funds to purchase online property and turn it into an oligopoly similar to Coca-Cola, Pepsico owning Frito-Lays, Proctor & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, Microsoft, The Walt Disney Co., etc... LtJohnny117 (talk) 22:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are not notable. Qcne (talk) 22:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. will be getting a legal notices if myself and the Wikipedia community cannot publish to wikipedia.org LtJohnny117 (talk) 22:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:LEGALTHREAT. Either redact your legal threat immediately or your talk page access will be revoked. Qcne (talk) 22:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you are been notified that legal actions will take place against Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. LtJohnny117 (talk) 22:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LtJohnny117 (talk) 21:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Izno (talk) 22:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]