User talk:Lotusyeeter

Welcome!

Hello, Lotusyeeter! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 19:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Vlassis Rassias

I reverted your addition to Vlassis Rassias per WP:FAILEDVERIFICATION. The first source was not a WP:RS, and the info was misrepresented; attending an open lecture is not the same thing as being accepted in an organisation. The last two sources were good, but the quote is attributed to YSEE USA, not Rassias. I turned one of them into a further reading link rather than removing it entirely. There is good info about Rassias in there, but please make sure that everything is supported by the sources and free from your own synthesis. Ffranc (talk) 13:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Saitama Prefecture Dog Lover Serial Murders

Hello, Lotusyeeter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saitama Prefecture Dog Lover Serial Murders, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saitama Prefecture Dog Lover Serial Murders

Hello, Lotusyeeter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saitama Prefecture Dog Lover Serial Murders".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:19, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vlassis Rassias and YSEE again

I reverted your new additions of controversy sections to the articles Vlassis Rassias and Supreme Council of Ethnic Hellenes, for similar reasons as in 2020 (see above). There may very well be info of the type you added that is warrented to mention in the articles, but it needs to comply with Wikipedia policies such as WP:RS and WP:OR. You can for example not take a text by Rassias and make your own interpretation of it, adding labels that aren't present in it. If you add criticism, it must be criticism that has been published in a source Wikipedia considers reliable, or even better, an uninvolved scholar's summary of conflicts and criticism that others have engaged in. If you want good examples of how to write about nationalism and paganism, I suggest you take a look at the articles Else Christensen and Doreen Valiente. They don't cover anything up, but everything is cited to good sources and there are no sections devoted entirely to criticism; the info is mentioned where it is relevant, and not in the form of attacks on the person. Ffranc (talk) 09:54, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused as I cited two to three academic papers where he was listed as nationalistic, white supremacist etc. I also do not understand why controversy sections are an issue when many Wikipedia pages on public persons have controversy sections (such as the late Jerry Lee Lewis). Lotusyeeter (talk) 22:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If Aleister Crowley's page is a relevant example as well, we could have a "views on monotheism and ethnicity" section, but the content itself shouldn't require that much change. Lotusyeeter (talk) 22:06, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I could also change the header to "criticism", though the YouTuber thing was sufficiently big enough of an issue within the community for it to be considered controversial, in my opinion (and experience). I don't think it's fair to the subject to relegate all criticisms to "further reading" at the bottom of the pages. Lotusyeeter (talk) 22:09, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just double checked and I see the Jerry Lee Lewis relationships is more of a subsection! My bad. Lotusyeeter (talk) 22:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Youtube videos will never comply with WP:RS, they can't be used as sources. If there ever is some scholarly article or similar source that summarizes these conflicts we can use that. But if it's just another online fight it will likely never be notable. The other sources you used are at best in a grey area, as they are from CESNUR which is listed as unreliable at WP:RSP. Maybe that will change at some point, but as of now they need to be avoided, and there are probably users who would delete them from the further reading section as well. Nevertheless, I didn't spot anything in those sources where Rassias or the YSEE are referred to as nationalistic or white supremacist. If it doesn't explicitly say so, it can't be in the articles, and even if it is explicit, it will need attribution, so readers have a clear picture of who the label comes from. Ffranc (talk) 11:36, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I see. I think only one author wrote for CESNUR though -- do the other papers have reliability issues as well? Lotusyeeter (talk) 22:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean "Mary, Athena, and Kuan-yin", it should be fine as a source. But make sure that everything you write actually is in the source. For example, the paper quotes an anti-Semitic comment from YSEE USA, but not from the Greek organization nor from Rassias. It says there are "romantic" elements in the YSEE's journal, but nothing about nationalism or supremacism, quite the opposite actually. Ffranc (talk) 12:10, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hi Lotusyeeter! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sandtalon (talk) 07:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What should I do if a claim lacks citations and were made from a biased editor? Lotusyeeter (talk) 07:35, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, if it is contentious (and if you're arguing over it and using words like "biased," then it clearly is), then that's not the right place for a minor edit. You are free to change that material, but just don't check the minor box! Claims without citations...may be more of a grey area, depending on what they are, but in general, it is best to be very judicious and limited with what edits you mark minor. Typos, obvious vandalism, corrections to obvious factual errors that someone is unlikely to dispute—these are the places for minor edits. The page linked above goes into it in more detail and the rationale. Sandtalon (talk) 20:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand! Sorry for the confusion. Lotusyeeter (talk) 20:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kami of Kumano (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please refrain from linking to categories or disambiguation pages in the body of the article, if they can be avoided. It is also not yet established how this subject is notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kami of Kumano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Is it that I need English sources? Or simply more? Lotusyeeter (talk) 21:06, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lotusyeeter! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kami of Kumano

Hello, Lotusyeeter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kami of Kumano, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]