User talk:LostOldPassword

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:LostOldPassword.

Disgraceful

Instead of dealing with the issue I presented, I have been bullied and bad faith has been assumed, and you and the others who have done that should feel ashamed. If people do not assume good faith, hear others concerns, and give them a fair hearing, Wikipedia does not work. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:07, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just closed the reassessment per the instructions. I suggest you fix the problem yourself and I really can't understand why you haven't already. That's how Wikipedia works. LostOldPassword (talk) 11:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Podiatry

I've deleted several of your prods on podiatry-related articles, as they all seem to be about notable topics. Yes, all of the articles need work, but they appear to be about notable topics, and deletion is no substitute for editing. I think their being worked on by a suspected sock puppet is not relevant here. I don't see any valid deletion reasons in any of the articles that I've un-prodded. Klausness (talk) 12:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Artichoke2020 & Yellowspacehopper

Your moniker implies you may have lost a p/w for an old account. Your editing style and grammar usage remind me of these two users who until recently edited UNC articles. I am curious as to if you are a reincarnation of either of these accounts? SuMadre (talk) 21:48, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Is this thing on?? SuMadre (talk) 17:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill seal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]