User talk:Lmbstl

Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a new message.

WUSTL seal

Hi Lmbstl thanks for all of the edits you've made to the Washington University page. I think you have done a great job and put a lot of work into the page. I have made some reverts to your edits but I don't mean them out of spite. And if you have any disagreements with me you can just come to my talk page. Also I want to inform you a recent chill has come over the editors over the Washington University page, because a university administrator has been editing the page, so just be a little cautious when editing the page.Astuishin 04:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Under fair use doctrine of a image, the image can only be used on the page in which it specialty concerns and since templates are used on multiple pages it violates WP fair use policy. Also concerning the WU administrators their are several problems, first an administrators job is the promote the university which is exactly what she was doing, and As you know WP is suppose to be objective source of information, not another opportunity for institutions to promote themselves. Read the talk page section titled Washington University Seal for more information if you have any more questionsAstuishin 06:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Lmbstl I meant the the Removal of Seal not Washington University Seall.Astuishin 06:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WUSTL WikiProject invite

Thank you for your offer to join the WUSTL WikiProject. I'm going to respectfully decline, however, as I don't think I have much to contribute. I'm a St. Louis area native, so I grew up with a lot of admiration for Wash U. But, I did not attend Wash U (I went to Mizzou) and I don't have any special knowledge about it. I made the contribution about the campus location because I'm a geographer, so the unqualified statement of the campus being in the City of St. Louis stuck out like a sore thumb to me. But now I'm out of info to contribute. :) Thanks again for the invitation; I'm glad my contribution didn't go unnoticed. Good luck with your WikiProject.—Lazytiger 14:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lmbstl, thanks for your note on my Talk Page. You asked whether I'd want to manage the To-Do list for the List of Washington University alumni page. I might be interested, but I'm not sure what managing the page entails. (I've never participated in a wikipedia "Project" before.) Also, I'm not on wikipedia every day, and I wonder whether the job requires checking in each day at least. Anyway, would be interested to hear more. As it is now, the list is in pretty good shape, but there are a few tasks that I think could improve it. Ultimately, the weakest part of the WUSTL series, I think, might be the absence of a good, extensive history -- and for that, someone's going to have to delve into the two books written on WUSTL's history (I added these to WUSTL "Further reading" awhile back, although I haven't looked them over), because in this particular case I don't think a decent narrative can be stitched together from bits and pieces on the web. Best, Ropcat 19:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your latest note. I really appreciate your invitation, and your patient explanation of how this works! I went ahead and added some tasks that I thought needed doing, now listed in the "To-Do" box for the Alumni List article. I hope this will help move the article along over time. Good luck with the project. I'm in kind of a busy period right now but, after the next few months are over, I look forward to contributing more regularly on WUSTL-related topics. In the past, I've spent most of my WUSTL-related wikipedia time categorizing -- creating the current WUSTL categories and searching for pre-existing content to add to each cat and subcat -- rather than writing. But I will try to do more on the writing front during the spring. In the meantime, I'll serve as "manager" for the Alumni List article, as you invited me to do, by checking in every few days to see what's going on with it and posting any new suggestions that come to mind. (Fighting off persistent vandalism from multiple IP's on that page got pretty time-consuming for Astuishin and me, but I think we finally dealt with it for the time being.) I appreciate and admire your initiative in getting this project rolling. The whole series will be much better for it. Best, Ropcat 07:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WUSTL revert

Sorry, that was a mistake. Go ahead and change it back. RedRollerskate 15:37, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My edits to the template

Hello. I hope that my edit summary shows that I meant no malice regarding the template (also that I made an additional constructive edit). At any rate, I just wanted to let you know that I have replied to your post on my talk page. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 13:27, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WUSTL WikiProject invitation

Hi, thank you for your invitation I would love to participate, but I am new here, and I can't spend much time here, so maybe I can't do much. I will try to make my contribution, although it might be small. Best Wishes! minbaili

Good job!

I see that my efforts were helpful in the creation of your project :) If you have any questions about things I've done I'll try to help you. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 22:41, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your response at my talk page

Hello. Subst is a thing you can do on any template. It just substitutes the template tag with content of the template. If I write {{subst:UserWUSTL}} in a page it'll just replace the tag with the contents of the template. Then, i can remove the Category tags. I'll present an example (feel free to copy and paste it to any page):

WU	This user attends or attended Washington University.

Notice that i removed the category tag. However, this way, the subst has to be redone if you have updated the template. But it's just the same with images, so that's no problemo. --Ysangkok 07:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You could also have a category parameter that selects whether or not to include the category when the template is transcluded. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 09:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What? How? That would cascade any updates to transcluded templates, which is most certainly optimal! --Lmbstl 09:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You'd use m:Parserfunctions. There's a steep learning curve, though. I use a few in my project template. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 15:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olin School + other issues

You are probably correct concerning the logo Lmbstl, I actually was never convinced that the image was ever a official school logo however with all the other business schools having one I thought that the Olin school needed one as well. I failed to check the edit history of the page and assumed it was some type of vandalism when it was removed. Is the Washington U marketing logo allowed to be placed on other pages? I don't mean to be a strict interpreter of the copyright regulations on wp, however I wish to avoid any confrontations with the administration. I noticed it on the business school and Danforth campus pages. On the ongoing discussion concerning the Washington U. shield I have decided to stay clear of it for now; as I was the original perpetrator in the old seal fiasco I do not want to ruin the prospect of having a historical symbol of the University placed on wikipedia. - thank you Astuishin 14:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I believe that your assumption is quite correct, I examined the website, which of course is all I can do, and found no logo. - thank you Astuishin 08:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to your edits at {{Forms of government}}

Please refer to template talk page so we can discuss and arrive at an agreement to your recent edits. Kind regards, Lord Metroid 09:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your NWHI Template

I really like this new template, but I want to let you know I have tweaked it just a bit- see its talk page. SeanMD80^{talk | contribs} 04:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Field Chinese Translation

Hi, I finished a Chinese translation of Francis Field. Could you please leave me you email address so that I can send you the MS-WORD file of that? And there are still some details I need to discuss with you. Mine is minbaili"at"gmail(I suppose you can guess what it is ^_^). With Regards, MIN, Baili 04:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject St. Louis

Hello, I noticed you've made edits to St. Louis articles or that you are in some way connected to metropolitan area. I thought you might want to become a member of the St. Louis WikiProject. We've recently built the project page and started a drive to improve St. Louis related articles. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. Once an article's status has been agreed upon, feel free to stop by and lend a hand in getting it to featured article status. Hope you can participate!

Grey Wanderer | Talk 21:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WashU student union

Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I expressed my opinion on the issue in that talk section. I agree with you that removing 90% of an article and then placing notability tags on it seems disingenuous. I was going to restore the article as it was but there really was far too much unsourced info. I'm not sure that the Student Union deserves its own article, but if you think it's worth saving I'd recommend adding some more StudLife sourced info before they put it up for AfD (which is only a matter of time now that the merge is sufficiently contested). Oren0 (talk) 01:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't make the ccase that it deserves its own article. I just don't agree with the methodology of its removal. Thanks, Oren0! --Lmbstl (talk) 02:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The best course of action is to re-add info to the article, being careful to source everything. Don't turn it into an edit war, though. If they continue to be unreasonable we can consider an WP:RFC, though I still expect an WP:AFD to come first. Oren0 (talk) 06:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added my few cents. If you weren't aware, I'm trying to start a WikiProject for student unions. See the proposal here. GreenJoe 16:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WUSTL Student Union

I can see that things are spiraling out of control here, so I'll try to explain my actions a bit more thoroughly. I can see why it would look like I'm on a rampage from your point of view. So, this post is long, but I hope it helps smooth things over...

As far as the concern that I was canvassing, I came across User:Paddy_Simcox when I saw his AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Associated Students of Arizona State University and saw he was cleaning up the same type of articles I was working on, and asked if he would like to help. I don't think that qualifies as canvassing, which is usually "If you agree with me vote here on this AFD/RFC." I just asked for his help in merging this group of articles. Also, Paddy Simcox has AFDd a bunch of UK student unions, which I haven't touched (since I know US/UK student unions are different animals, and I know nothing about the British ones).

As far as the concern that User:Paddy_Simcox and I are suckpuppets, we are not. I can't really prove that unless you can find an admin to run IP checks, or whatever people do to check that out. Yeah, I see that he's only been around for a few weeks, and that prods are usually reserved for more skilled editors. That I cannot explain. Perhaps he lost his old password and made a new account. Maybe he's just a fast learner, I dunno.

As far as the list of AFDs, I am a very organized person, so I did keep track of the articles I was working on: User:RedShiftPA/Cleanup. I also keep a to do list (User:RedShiftPA/ToDo) and a list of thing I've already done (User:RedShiftPA#My wikipedia projects). That "cleanup" page doesn't mean I was issuing orders to anyone, just that I'm anal retentive.

I really don't have a vendetta or grudge against student government articles. Here's the (rather long and boring) story of why I started merging a bunch of these articles: As you can see from my contrib list, I almost exclusively edit articles in politics (especially PA politics). I was beefing up the College Republican article and adding a bunch of folks to the Category:College Republicans, when I stumbled across the article for something called "DUGBA" Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dugba, which was merged into the Associated Students of Michigan State University article [1]. It was an insanely well done article about their student government, but it was totally original research. I even tried to contact the VP to see if they wanted to save some of the history of the organization before it was merged (no luck with the email, by the way). So, then I worked with the original author User:Lovelac7 to merge it to the main MSU article Michigan State University#Associated Students of Michigan State University. You can see from his talk page that we worked very well on the merging process. From there I saw Category:Student governments in the United States and was surprised to see so many similar articles. And that is how I came to the WUSTL student union article.

But, in conclusion, I really think that student government/student unions are best served under the main article. Wikipedia can't be a hosting service for lists of former student government presidents and a server for constitutions. Anything that can pass WP:OR and WP:RS wouldn't be much more than a stub.

As far as my tactics go, I didn't foresee that merging these article would be very contentious. I now (very clearly) know that this is not the case. So, for assuming that, I apologize.Is there some common ground that we can find on merging these into the main article? I will post this on a few other talk pages of editor who are also in the discussion. --RedShiftPA (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RedShiftPA, thanks for the note, it is much appreciated. I am sure we can find a common ground, we just have to discuss it. As I have said, I am not necessarily against a merge or a deletion, but, as I see you understand, we can't let it happen the way it has been happening.

I am sure it would go a long way if you could post your desire to find common ground on on the WUSTL talk page where the main discussion is going on. I see it this way: either the WUSTL Student Union article should be improved, or it should be condensed and merged. If it fails notability, we can all determine that. I think we all agree that it is not good enough in its present form, so something must change. Let's focus on that! Best, --Lmbstl (talk) 15:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for understanding. I really think that the article should be merge, and I am glad that you and I agree in principle. But, I am concerned that it only takes 1 guy who disagrees with us to revert all of the work, and then we'd be forced to reach a new consensus again. So, I AFD'd the [student union]. I don't want you or anyone else to take it as a sign of disrespect or unilateral action. An AFD is probably the best way to get a solid consensus on the merger that can withstand random reverts. I notified people (including people who disagree with me) that I have done this--and I made sure to avoid canvassing. I have AFD'd other student government articles that are facing the same issues as the WUSU. I also added them to the WP:UNI delete notice board so that members of the project can voice their opinion. Again, I hope this helps us reach a good solid consensus. Cheers!--RedShiftPA (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not personal, but I am disappointed (and annoyed) at your implicit objective that the article should be deleted without an opportunity to be improved, particularly kicking off the deletion process in the name of consensus. (There were no "random reverts"-- I reverted the article until could sort out what was happening). I guess it is notable that you notified people about the AFD, but could you be in any more of a hurry? It is clear that you view discussions as an obstacle to getting the article deleted.

I will vote for a merge instead of a complete removal. You know very well why the original request to merge was contested-- it was more related to your methodology than anything else-- allowing no reasonable timeframe to scope the article for possible improvement relative to the items you tagged it with (for example, notability, sources, etc). As a result, there has been a collossal waste of time and effort.

I hope in the future you can better channel your determination (which I admire). Eventually, you will need more than User:Paddy_Simcox to make such changes. Best, --Lmbstl (talk) 03:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:Image:131553360 5b43872721 o.jpg

Hi, Is Image:131553360 5b43872721 o.jpg licensed under just the CC-Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 license or is it a CC-Attribution license? Because Wikipedia likes to have everything in it free to be modified by everybody, Wikipedia can't accept images that are "No Derivative" licensing. Guroadrunner (talk) 10:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:131551651 87de40abca b.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:131551651 87de40abca b.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:131551651 87de40abca b.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[2][3]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:131551651 87de40abca b.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Lmbstl. You have new messages at Ged UK's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Ged UK 14:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WUSTLuserImage2007-01-26 15-11-40.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:WUSTLuserImage2007-01-26 15-11-40.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Zoo Fari 00:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WUSTL Seal

Hey, I remember you from the WUSTL wikiproject, which looks like it's dead as of late. I've been looking at the article again, at old discussions and at Wiki policy & I think there's a good case for the actual emblem or seal on the page. In 2007 when a wiki bureaucrat removed the seal, he said WUSTL had requested it contain a copyright symbol on the page. I think that's stupid and if it came down to it it wouldn't legally be shown necessary, but since I don't think Wikipedia going to back us up here I think it might be worth adding the seal or emblem with a copyright symbol. What do you think? caz | speak 06:25, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WUSTLarticles

Template:WUSTLarticles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to Wikipedia Takes St. Louis!

Dust off your Polaroid camera and pack your best lenses. The first-ever Wikipedia Takes St. Louis photo hunt kicks off Sat, Sept. 15, at 12:30pm in downtown St. Louis. Tour the streets of the Rome of the West with other Wikipedians and even learn a little St. Louis history. This event is a fun and collaborative way to enhance St. Louis articles with visual content. Novice photographers welcome! Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 00:27, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Washington University in St. Louis

Template:WikiProject Washington University in St. Louis has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kumioko (talk) 02:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WUSTLprojectImage2007-01-26 15-10-34.png

The file File:WUSTLprojectImage2007-01-26 15-10-34.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProjectWUSTLinvite

Template:WikiProjectWUSTLinvite has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WUSTLinstitutes

Template:WUSTLinstitutes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:19, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Centers and institutes of Washington University in St. Louis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Centers and institutes of Washington University in St. Louis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centers and institutes of Washington University in St. Louis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SWinxy (talk) 00:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Campus life at Washington University in St. Louis

The article Campus life at Washington University in St. Louis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage outside of primary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wozal (talk) 16:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]