User talk:Lalitpatil

Welcome!

Hello, Lalitpatil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Hindu. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Thank you. Buddhipriya 08:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hindu. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Abecedare 09:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Shivaji. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Abecedare 09:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Hindu, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Abecedare 05:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your message

With regards to the message you left on my talk page [1], please note that as per wikipedia's verifibiality policy, "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Material that is challenged or likely to be challenged needs a reliable source, which should be cited in the article." Also read wikipedia's policies on neutral point of view before you add the same POV material again. Abecedare 05:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Hindu, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Abecedare 09:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Do not edit userpages as you did Abecedare in response to the warning you were giving. It is a form of vandalism. If you wish to dialog with someone please do it on their talk page. Buddhipriya 01:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Lalitpatil! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Prakash Dahake - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:38, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prakash Dahake

The article Prakash Dahake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication Dahake has received significant coverage in reliable independent sources--the two references cited include only passing mentions. Article tagged for notability since March 2008.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --DGaw (talk) 02:37, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Hinduism

WikiProject Hinduism

Hello, Lalitpatil. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. We would like to introduce a newsletter to Wikiproject Hinduism. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!

Subscribe

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Hinduism. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]