User talk:LSKIYAPSD

Welcome

Hello, LSKIYAPSD, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 11:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/hello (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:LSKIYAPSD/sandbox/hello and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:LSKIYAPSD/sandbox/hello, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LSKIYAPSD! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Defseca.com is not a reliable source

Hello, I'm Worldbruce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of equipment of the Bangladesh Army, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of equipment of the Bangladesh Army, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Facebook is not a reliable source. Pindad.com is a reliable source, but neither Facebook nor Pindad.com says the Bangladesh Army has purchased any weapons from Pindad, only that Pindad has offered to sell them, a Bangladeshi military delegation has visited Pindad, and has test fired their SPR-2 sniper rifle there. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, Can't you see that from Facebook and defseca.com, it's some evidence that the Bangladesh army bought defense equipment from Indonesia including SS2 rifles. And my question is: how can you prove that defseca.com isn't a reliable source? Thank you. LSKIYAPSD (talk) 00:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If an editor isn't watching a talk page (I'm not watching yours), they won't know you've posted there unless you use some kind of notification template, see Help:Talk pages.

Almost all websites, except for those published by traditional publishers (such as news media organizations), are self-published and therefore largely not acceptable. They have no impartial editorial review to evaluate the accuracy of information, and are published by businesses or organizations that want you to believe their point of view. The burden is on the editor citing a source to prove that it is a reliable source for the content in question. Defseca.com has been discussed at the reliable sources noticeboard and was found unreliable here and here (under its previous name of bdmilitary.com).

There are only a handful of reliable secondary sources about the equipment of the Bangladesh Army as a whole. The Military Balance (published by the International Institute for Strategic Studies), the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Jane's Weapons, and World Air Forces. Stick to them as much as possible. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:34, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You are Vandalising the Assault rifle list. Do not add things that were unrelated to assault rifles example:You added a semi automatic rifle to the assault rifle list. You falsely removed the links that were assault rifles. 2406:3003:2002:EFB:441C:912A:1D0A:2F9 (talk) 08:14, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i dont care LSKIYAPSD (talk) 01:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of assault rifles, you may be blocked from editing. 2406:3003:2002:2183:9D73:8E1C:5AAF:C72F (talk)

This is your final warning. Stop using your disruptive editing. I will call your administrations if you do so again as you did at List of assault rifles, you will be blocked.

Concern regarding User:LSKIYAPSD/sandbox/hello

Hello, LSKIYAPSD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:LSKIYAPSD/sandbox/hello, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Always cite reliable sources

You recently added content to an article, List of equipment of the Bangladesh Army, but you didn't provide a reliable source. See the WP:RSN archives to understand why military-today.com is not a reliable source. Editors there commented: "precisely the type of source we shouldn't be using", "no real justification for using self published internet sites as sources", "it is not possible for a reasonable editor to mistake this source as reliable", and so forth. Facebook is considered generally unreliable because it is a self-published source with no editorial oversight, see WP:RS/PS. Consequently, your addition has been removed. If you can cite a reliable source as explained on your talk page earlier this year, you're welcome to re-add the content. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:55, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of equipment of the Pakistan Army, you may be blocked from editing. Technopat (talk) 06:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

shut up LSKIYAPSD (talk) 01:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm Nagol0929. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of equipment of the Royal Cambodian Army without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:52, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you have no need to know why i removing some contents from that page. In fact, those contents are not necessary at all LSKIYAPSD (talk) 01:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Special Forces Command (Cambodia), you may be blocked from editing. You have been repeatedly warned about this, so should know that you need to add references to reliable sources when you add material like this to articles. Nick-D (talk) 01:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can u please leave me alone? Just let me finish my editing step by step. LSKIYAPSD (talk) 11:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please add references when you add material. Nick-D (talk) 07:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick-D (talk) 07:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sources you added to the Special Forces Command (Cambodia) were all either low quality or did not support the claims. As you have been warned repeatedly for this, I'm blocking your account. Please take the time to read WP:RS and WP:V. Nick-D (talk) 07:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

u are dumb LSKIYAPSD (talk) 23:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As your response to this block has been as rude and unconstructive as your response to the various warnings above, I've extended the block duration to indefinite as I have no confidence that you will actually follow Wikipedia's policies on referencing. If you would like a review of this decision now, or when you think you are ready to follow these policies in the future please use the process noted in the template above to ask for an admin's review. Nick-D (talk) 07:30, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LSKIYAPSD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will follow the Wikipedia's policies on referencing LSKIYAPSD (talk) 00:11, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We will need more than a mere statement that you will do so; why didn't you in the first place? That is also no longer the only issue here, please discuss your uncivil and poor response to those trying to explain things to you; this should include an understanding of WP:NPA. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LSKIYAPSD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Support Team, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to kindly request the reopening of my Wikipedia account, which has been indefine blocked. I understand that there may have been a violation of the platform's policies, and I sincerely apologize for any oversight on my part. I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and ensuring that my contributions align with the community's standards. If there are specific issues that led to the account block, I would appreciate any guidance or clarification provided. I value the collaborative nature of Wikipedia and the opportunity to contribute to the wealth of knowledge shared on the platform. I assure you that I will take any necessary steps to rectify the situation and prevent similar occurrences in the future. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your prompt assistance in resolving this matter. Sincerely, LSKIYAPSD (talk) 13:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Requests like this demonstrate WP:CIR applies. It's completely inappropriate of you to make a request like this. Yamla (talk) 17:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.